Revenue growth has flattened to 0.7% year-over-year on $1.7B of quarterly sales while gross margin slid to 16.0% and diluted EPS declined 54.3% to $0.21, suggesting the pricing actions taken over recent quarters are no longer offsetting underlying volume softness in the QSR channel.
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) annual income statement — 13-year revenue, gross profit & net income history
| Metric | TTM | May'26 | May'25 | May'24 | May'23 | May'22 | May'21 | May'20 | May'19 | May'18 | May'17 | May'16 | May'15 | May'14 |
|---|
| Sales/Revenue | 6.62B | 6.61B | 6.45B | 6.47B | 5.35B | 4.1B | 3.67B | 3.79B | 3.76B | 3.42B | 3.17B | 2.99B | 2.92B | 2.82B |
| Revenue Growth % | 2.58% | 2.5% | -0.25% | 20.88% | 30.54% | 11.66% | -3.2% | 0.96% | 9.72% | 8.07% | 5.82% | 2.35% | 3.9% | - |
| Cost of Goods Sold | 5.34B | 5.25B | 5.05B | 4.7B | 3.92B | 3.27B | 2.84B | 2.9B | 2.75B | 2.54B | 2.39B | 2.33B | 2.34B | 2.23B |
| COGS % of Revenue | - | 79.44% | 78.32% | 72.68% | 73.23% | 79.7% | 77.34% | 76.39% | 73.29% | 74.31% | 75.42% | 77.89% | 79.92% | 79.13% |
| Gross Profit | 1.28B | 1.36B | 1.4B | 1.77B | 1.43B | 832M | 832M | 895.2M | 1B | 879.5M | 778.8M | 661.8M | 587.3M | 587.5M |
| Gross Margin % | 19.38% | 20.56% | 21.68% | 27.32% | 26.77% | 20.3% | 22.66% | 23.61% | 26.71% | 25.69% | 24.58% | 22.11% | 20.08% | 20.87% |
| Gross Profit Growth % | - | -2.78% | -20.84% | 23.36% | 72.13% | 0% | -7.06% | -10.79% | 14.1% | 12.93% | 17.68% | 12.69% | -0.03% | - |
| Operating Expenses | 767M | 768.6M | 733.5M | 701.4M | 550M | 387.6M | 357.2M | 338.3M | 335.1M | 299.4M | 260.5M | 288.5M | 205.9M | 220.8M |
| OpEx % of Revenue | - | 11.62% | 11.37% | 10.84% | 10.28% | 9.46% | 9.73% | 8.92% | 8.92% | 8.74% | 8.22% | 9.64% | 7.04% | 7.84% |
| Selling, General & Admin | 681.2M | 664.6M | 633.5M | 701.4M | 550M | 387.6M | 357.2M | 338.3M | 335.1M | 299.4M | 260.5M | 288.5M | 205.9M | 213.2M |
| SG&A % of Revenue | - | 10.05% | 9.82% | 10.84% | 10.28% | 9.46% | 9.73% | 8.92% | 8.92% | 8.74% | 8.22% | 9.64% | 7.04% | 7.57% |
| Research & Development | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.6M |
| R&D % of Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.27% |
| Other Operating Expenses | 4M | 104M | 100M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Operating Income | 516.8M | 591.1M | 665.1M | 1.07B | 882.1M | 444.4M | 474.8M | 556.9M | 668.4M | 580.1M | 518.3M | 373.3M | 381.4M | 366.7M |
| Operating Margin % | 7.8% | 8.94% | 10.31% | 16.47% | 16.49% | 10.84% | 12.93% | 14.68% | 17.79% | 16.94% | 16.36% | 12.47% | 13.04% | 13.03% |
| Operating Income Growth % | - | -11.13% | -37.57% | 20.77% | 98.49% | -6.4% | -14.74% | -16.68% | 15.22% | 11.92% | 38.84% | -2.12% | 4.01% | - |
| EBITDA | 919.1M | 987.8M | 1.04B | 1.37B | 1.1B | 636.5M | 662.6M | 739.2M | 830.8M | 723.4M | 627.4M | 469.2M | 477.8M | 445.9M |
| EBITDA Margin % | 13.88% | 14.94% | 16.12% | 21.21% | 20.65% | 15.53% | 18.05% | 19.49% | 22.12% | 21.13% | 19.8% | 15.67% | 16.34% | 15.84% |
| EBITDA Growth % | -7.01% | -5.01% | -24.21% | 24.18% | 73.59% | -3.94% | -10.36% | -11.03% | 14.85% | 15.3% | 33.72% | -1.8% | 7.15% | - |
| D&A (Non-Cash Add-back) | 402.3M | 396.7M | 374.8M | 306.8M | 222.8M | 192.1M | 187.8M | 182.3M | 162.4M | 143.3M | 109.1M | 95.9M | 96.4M | 79.2M |
| EBIT | 516.8M | 591.1M | 665.1M | 1.07B | 882.1M | 444.4M | 474.8M | 556.9M | 668.4M | 580.1M | 518.3M | 373.3M | 381.4M | 364M |
| Net Interest Income | -179.2M | -180.5M | -180M | -135.8M | -109.2M | -161M | -118.3M | -108M | -107.1M | -108.8M | -61.2M | -5.9M | -6.1M | -5.3M |
| Interest Income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200K | 200K | 300K |
| Interest Expense | 179.2M | 180.5M | 180M | 135.8M | 109.2M | 161M | 118.3M | 108M | 107.1M | 108.8M | 61.2M | 6.1M | 6.3M | 5.6M |
| Other Income/Expense | -179.2M | -180.5M | -180M | -135.8M | -109.2M | -161M | -118.3M | -108M | -47.6M | -25.2M | -7.9M | 65.8M | 36.6M | 21.3M |
| Pretax Income | 337.6M | 410.6M | 485.1M | 929.5M | 772.9M | 283.4M | 356.5M | 448.9M | 620.8M | 554.9M | 510.4M | 439.1M | 418M | 388M |
| Pretax Margin % | 5.1% | 6.21% | 7.52% | 14.37% | 14.45% | 6.91% | 9.71% | 11.84% | 16.53% | 16.21% | 16.11% | 14.67% | 14.29% | 13.78% |
| Income Tax | 97.1M | 128.1M | 143.1M | 230M | 224.6M | 71.8M | 90.5M | 112.3M | 133.6M | 121.2M | 170.2M | 144.5M | 140.4M | 117.7M |
| Effective Tax Rate % | 28.76% | 31.2% | 29.5% | 24.74% | 29.06% | 25.34% | 25.39% | 25.02% | 21.52% | 21.84% | 33.35% | 32.91% | 33.59% | 30.34% |
| Net Income | 254.8M | 290M | 357.2M | 725.5M | 1.01B | 200.9M | 317.8M | 365.9M | 478.6M | 416.8M | 326.9M | 285.3M | 268.3M | 260.9M |
| Net Margin % | 3.85% | 4.39% | 5.54% | 11.22% | 18.86% | 4.9% | 8.66% | 9.65% | 12.74% | 12.17% | 10.32% | 9.53% | 9.17% | 9.27% |
| Net Income Growth % | -13.36% | -18.81% | -50.77% | -28.09% | 402.19% | -36.78% | -13.15% | -23.55% | 14.83% | 27.5% | 14.58% | 6.34% | 2.84% | - |
| Net Income (Continuing) | 240.5M | 282.5M | 342M | 699.5M | 548.3M | 211.6M | 266M | 336.6M | 487.2M | 433.7M | 340.2M | 294.6M | 277.6M | 270.3M |
| Discontinued Operations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minority Interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EPS (Diluted) | 1.85 | 2.08 | 2.50 | 4.98 | 6.95 | 1.38 | 2.16 | 2.49 | 3.18 | 2.82 | 2.22 | 1.92 | 1.82 | 1.78 |
| EPS Growth % | -12.44% | -16.8% | -49.8% | -28.35% | 403.62% | -36.11% | -13.25% | -21.7% | 12.77% | 27.03% | 15.63% | 5.49% | 2.25% | - |
| EPS (Basic) | - | 2.09 | 2.51 | 5.01 | 6.98 | 1.38 | 2.17 | 2.50 | 3.19 | 2.83 | 2.22 | 1.92 | 1.82 | 1.78 |
| Diluted Shares Outstanding | 138.1M | 139.1M | 142.7M | 145.6M | 145.2M | 145.9M | 147.1M | 147.1M | 147.3M | 147M | 146.6M | 146.4M | 146.4M | 146.4M |
| Basic Shares Outstanding | 137.6M | 138.9M | 142.2M | 144.9M | 144.5M | 145.5M | 146.4M | 146.2M | 146.5M | 146.3M | 146.1M | 146.3M | 146.3M | 146.3M |
| Dividend Payout Ratio | - | 71.55% | 57.92% | 23.98% | 14.48% | 68.89% | 42.57% | 33.15% | 23.67% | 26.44% | 260.29% | - | - | - |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LW stock.
For fiscal year 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) reported total revenue of $6.61B. This represents a 134.9% increase compared to $2.82B in 2014.
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) is profitable, generating $290.0M in net income for the fiscal year ending 2026 with a net profit margin of 4.4%.
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) reported an operating income of $591.1M, resulting in an operating profit margin of 8.9%. This margin reflects the operational efficiency of the business before interest and taxes.
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) generated $1.36B in gross profit for the year, representing a gross profit margin of 20.6%. This demonstrates the company's core pricing power and production efficiency.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Gross margin collapse amid cost inflation
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Gross Margin Compression Steepens Sharply
Gross margin has deteriorated from approximately 24.1% in late 2024 to just 16.0% in the most recent quarter (2027Q1), representing roughly 810 basis points of compression that appears to reflect persistent input cost pressure on potatoes, edible oils, and energy that the company has struggled to pass through.
The trajectory reveals a troubling pattern: after a brief margin spike to 27.8% in 2025Q3 — which likely reflects a non-recurring input cost tailwind rather than structural improvement — gross margin has compressed steadily, settling into a 20-21% range for several quarters before plunging to 16.0% in 2027Q1. This suggests that Lamb Weston's annual potato contract renegotiation cycle may be locking in elevated input costs while QSR customers resist mid-term price adjustments. The 2027Q1 gross profit of $266.5M on $1.7B revenue implies that COGS consumed approximately 84% of the top line, a level that historically precedes further operating leverage deterioration given the company's high fixed-cost processing infrastructure.
Revenue Growth Stalls Near Stagnation
Over the trailing ten quarters, revenue growth has oscillated between negative 7.6% and positive 5.6%, with the latest quarter (2027Q1) posting only 0.7% year-over-year growth on $1.7B in revenue, suggesting that pricing actions are no longer offsetting underlying volume softness in the QSR channel.
The growth profile reveals a business struggling to expand beyond its North American base. Quarterly revenue has remained range-bound at $1.5-1.8B for two full years without establishing a clear upward trajectory, which is notable given the full acquisition of the Lamb Weston Meijer European JV that should have added incremental revenue. The deceleration from 5.6% growth in 2026Q4 to 0.7% in 2027Q1 — a single-quarter sequential collapse — may indicate that QSR traffic softening is beginning to impact fry attachment rates, though this interpretation warrants confirmation from management commentary. For a company valued as a category consolidator, mid-to-high single-digit revenue growth is typically required to justify premium multiples against diversified packaged food peers.
Operating Leverage Working in Reverse
Operating income collapsed to $82.2M in 2027Q1 versus $212.5M in 2024Q4, a decline of approximately 61%, while SG&A expenses remained relatively stable at $170.2M, indicating that the company's fixed-cost infrastructure is amplifying rather than cushioning the impact of gross margin erosion.
The operating leverage dynamics are unfavorable: SG&A has stayed within a $144-185M band throughout the ten-quarter window, meaning overhead costs are not being reduced in proportion to the gross profit decline. Operating margin has compressed from 13.2% to 4.9% over the same period, and at current revenue levels, each incremental percentage point of gross margin deterioration translates roughly to a full percentage point of operating margin loss. This structural inflexibility becomes particularly dangerous at 2027Q1 levels, where operating income of $82.2M against approximately $170M in SG&A leaves almost no buffer before breakeven operations. The absence of material restructuring charges in the reported data suggests management has not yet initiated meaningful cost rationalization.
EPS Volatility Exceeds Operating Reality
EPS growth has been deeply negative in eight of the last ten quarters, with 2027Q1 diluted EPS of $0.21 declining 54.3% year-over-year despite revenue remaining roughly flat, confirming that the earnings deterioration is fundamentally driven by margin compression rather than share count dynamics.
The quarterly EPS pattern is instructive: the -116.9% EPS decline in 2025Q2 alongside a $36.1M net loss suggests exposure to non-operating items such as commodity derivative mark-to-market swings, which is consistent with the hedging activity referenced in company disclosures. In 2027Q1, net income of $29.1M represents a 1.7% net margin — the thinnest positive reading in the entire dataset — which implies that after operating income of $82.2M, approximately $53M was absorbed by interest expense, taxes, and other non-operating items. With a Debt/Equity ratio of 2.16x, interest costs represent a material fixed drag that becomes increasingly burdensome as operating margins compress, suggesting that further margin deterioration could push the company toward quarterly breakeven earnings.
2027Q1 Marks Potential Profitability Floor
The most recent quarter represents the sharpest sequential profitability decline in the ten-quarter history, with gross profit falling 37.3% quarter-over-quarter from $361.4M to $266.5M, an outcome that appears too severe to be explained by normal seasonality alone and may signal a structural rather than cyclical margin reset.
Comparing 2027Q1 to the prior-year first quarter (2026Q1), revenue was approximately flat at $1.7B while gross profit fell from $342.4M to $266.5M, a year-over-year decline of 22.2%. This divergence between stable revenue and collapsing gross profit points squarely at input cost escalation rather than demand destruction. The last time margins approached these levels was 2025Q2, when the company posted a net loss; if 2027Q1 represents a new equilibrium rather than a trough, the earnings recovery narrative embedded in the $0.86 consensus estimate base appears increasingly difficult to support. Investors should monitor whether subsequent quarters show sequential margin stabilization or continued deterioration, as this would determine whether the current level represents a floor or the beginning of further erosion.
Fixed-Cost Model Faces Margin Durability Question
The strongest challenge to the bull case is that Lamb Weston's 21.68% trailing gross margin is already below diversified packaged food peers like Nomad Foods (27.1%) and Simply Good Foods (35.1%), yet its revenue growth profile of approximately 2.5% does not command the growth premium necessary to justify the elevated 2.16x Debt/Equity leverage embedded in its capital structure.
The counter-argument to any margin recovery thesis rests on the observation that potato contract prices may be structurally increasing due to Columbia Basin land competition and water rights constraints, meaning the input cost environment that compressed margins to 16.0% in 2027Q1 may represent a higher-cost equilibrium rather than a temporary disruption. Furthermore, the ERP implementation issues cited in company disclosures may have obscured demand signals during the transition period, making it difficult to distinguish between genuine end-market weakness and self-inflicted operational disruption. If QSR traffic softening proves more persistent than the historical trade-down pattern suggests, and if the elevated leverage profile limits the company's ability to absorb further margin compression without covenant concerns, the equity story could deteriorate materially from current levels.