Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -704.3x · EV/EBITDA 20.2x · ROE 26.4%. (2003–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $39.3B | $33.0B | $30.6B | $21.6B | $16.1B | $26.0B | $15.6B | $15.0B | $10.2B | $8.7B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $44.7B | $38.4B | $32.8B | $23.8B | $18.2B | $28.6B | $19.5B | $17.3B | $10.7B | $9.2B | $6.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | -704.29 | — | 47.26 | 69.85 | 108.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.56 | 1.31 | 1.32 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 4.15 | 8.38 | 1.30 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.69 |
| P/B Ratio | 21.55 | 18.16 | 15.73 | 14.60 | 21.15 | 71.52 | 112.46 | 7.85 | 6.11 | 5.25 | 3.17 |
| P/FCF | 117.91 | 99.03 | 29.15 | 24.35 | 10.90 | 16.04 | — | 144.43 | 15.34 | 23.32 | 12.84 |
| P/OCF | 28.19 | 23.68 | 17.74 | 15.86 | 8.81 | 14.60 | — | 31.96 | 10.85 | 14.00 | 9.00 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.52 | 1.42 | 1.05 | 1.09 | 4.56 | 10.49 | 1.50 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.79 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.20 | 17.35 | 23.85 | 14.87 | 15.56 | — | — | 22.57 | 16.17 | 19.84 | 12.00 |
| EV / EBIT | 30.10 | 28.50 | 30.77 | 18.86 | 23.72 | — | — | 50.64 | 39.18 | 93.49 | 39.80 |
| EV / FCF | — | 115.02 | 31.22 | 26.84 | 12.31 | 17.63 | — | 166.89 | 16.00 | 24.59 | 14.72 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 23.0% | 25.2% | 24.1% | 26.0% | 30.5% | 24.6% | 26.7% | 26.1% | 25.9% | 27.9% |
| Operating Margin | 5.9% | 5.9% | 3.6% | 4.8% | 4.3% | -6.7% | -88.8% | 2.8% | 2.5% | 0.9% | 2.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.0% | 2.0% | 3.9% | 2.5% | 1.6% | -10.4% | -92.7% | 0.6% | 0.6% | -0.1% | 0.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 26.4% | 26.4% | 52.3% | 49.6% | 47.3% | -259.2% | -168.1% | 3.9% | 3.6% | -0.4% | 0.2% |
| ROA | 2.3% | 2.3% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 1.7% | -5.2% | -16.0% | 0.7% | 0.8% | -0.1% | 0.0% |
| ROIC | 19.7% | 19.7% | 15.8% | 24.9% | 18.7% | -9.0% | -29.8% | 7.7% | 9.6% | 3.0% | 5.9% |
| ROCE | 13.4% | 13.4% | 8.5% | 12.6% | 9.2% | -5.8% | -24.2% | 5.6% | 6.3% | 2.2% | 4.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 6.84 | 6.84 | 4.25 | 5.70 | 10.08 | 20.53 | 46.59 | 2.51 | 1.68 | 1.38 | 1.36 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.63 | 5.63 | 6.02 | 5.27 | 6.57 | — | — | 6.25 | 4.27 | 4.96 | 4.50 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.93 | 1.12 | 1.49 | 2.74 | 7.09 | 28.29 | 1.22 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.46 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.41 | 2.41 | 1.58 | 1.38 | 1.78 | — | — | 3.04 | 0.67 | 1.02 | 1.53 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 15.99 | 2.07 | 2.49 | 1.41 | 1.59 | — | 22.46 | 0.67 | 1.27 | 1.88 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.26 | 4.26 | 3.27 | 3.61 | 2.76 | -1.16 | -7.19 | 2.18 | 1.93 | 0.91 | 1.45 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 1.02 | 1.03 | 0.88 | 1.09 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 0.88 | 1.08 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.51 | 0.62 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.10 | 1.18 | 1.19 | 1.01 | 0.44 | 0.18 | 1.05 | 1.27 | 1.29 | 1.16 |
| Inventory Turnover | 342.94 | 342.94 | 345.56 | 382.15 | 318.85 | 128.78 | 63.75 | 525.72 | 633.63 | 411.17 | 373.11 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 30.15 | 28.05 | 33.22 | 32.81 | 63.22 | 98.31 | 32.54 | 28.57 | 28.13 | 26.53 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 2.1% | 1.4% | 0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 0.8% | 1.0% | 3.4% | 4.1% | 9.2% | 6.2% | — | 0.7% | 6.5% | 4.3% | 7.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $232M | $236M | $231M | $232M | $217M | $212M | $210M | $207M | $205M | $202M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 23 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LYV stock.
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -704.3x. The historical average is 75.4x.
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 20.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.0x.
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 26.4%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -14.2%.
Based on historical data, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -704.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. has 23.0% gross margin and 5.9% operating margin.
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and seasonal volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple on Cyclical Earnings
LYV trades at 21.8x EV/EBITDA and 128.8x P/FCF, per reported data, implying the market capitalizes peak-season earnings despite extreme quarterly volatility and high leverage.
The trailing P/E is meaningless at -769x due to a small positive net income in 2026Q2, but the forward EV/EBITDA of 11.9x suggests the market expects a sharp EBITDA recovery. This multiple appears rich relative to peers like MSGE (25.3x) and EPR (14.0x), but LYV's growth acceleration and dominant market position may justify a premium. Investors should monitor whether the forward multiple compresses if event demand softens.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Earning Power
Gross margin swung from 85.1% in 2025Q3 to 20.4% in 2025Q4, while operating margin averaged 6.8% in 2026Q2, per financial statements, indicating that quarterly profitability is heavily influenced by event mix and timing.
The extreme gross margin swings reflect the mix of owned versus promoted events, with 2025Q3 likely including high-margin festival revenue. Operating margin of 6.8% in 2026Q2 is below the 9.3% peak in 2025Q3, suggesting that cost leverage is not consistent. Net margin of 3.8% in 2026Q2 is positive but thin, and the prior quarter's -10.3% net margin highlights the impact of seasonal losses and tax items. The true earning power likely lies in the mid-single-digit net margin range, but investors should adjust for non-recurring items.
ROIC Recovery but Equity Returns Distorted
ROIC improved to 14.3% in 2025Q3 from -4.1% in 2024Q4, per reported data, but ROE swung from -23.9% to 26.9% in 2026Q2, reflecting a razor-thin equity base.
ROIC of 14.3% in 2025Q3 indicates that the core business generates solid returns on invested capital during peak seasons, but the negative ROIC in 2024Q4 and 2025Q4 shows the cyclicality. ROE is distorted by the small equity base ($82.3M in 2026Q2), making it an unreliable metric. The improvement in ROIC suggests that management is deploying capital efficiently, but the sustainability depends on maintaining high asset turnover, which was only 0.28x in 2026Q2.
Working Capital Swings Distort Efficiency Metrics
CCC was -10 days in 2025Q4 and -9 days in 2024Q4, per reported data, but DSO and DPO fluctuate wildly, indicating that cash conversion is driven by seasonal prepayments and deferred revenue.
The negative cash conversion cycle suggests that LYV collects cash from ticket sales well before paying event costs, a structural advantage. However, DSO swings from 27 to 52 days and DPO from 36 to 192 days, reflecting the timing of festival and tour settlements. The 2026Q1 FCF margin of 53.5% versus -6.4% in 2025Q4 underscores that efficiency metrics are not stable. Investors should focus on annualized working capital trends rather than quarterly figures.
Leverage Elevated Despite Debt Reduction
D/E stood at 6.68 in 2026Q2, down from 7.38 in 2026Q1, but D/EBITDA of 7.11 remains high, per reported data, indicating that debt service is still a significant burden.
Total debt fell to $5.0B in 2026Q2 from $12.4B in 2025Q4, but the equity base is only $82.3M, making D/E misleadingly high. Interest coverage of 5.37x in 2026Q2 is adequate, but it was negative in 2026Q1 and 2025Q4, reflecting seasonal earnings. The high D/EBITDA of 7.11x suggests that leverage is still a concern, and any sustained downturn in event demand could strain debt service. Investors should monitor refinancing risk given the volatile cash flows.
Liquidity Cushion Thin Despite Cash Hoard
Current ratio was 0.85 in 2026Q2, with cash of $9.1B, per reported data, but current liabilities exceed current assets, indicating potential short-term funding pressure.
The current ratio below 1.0 suggests that LYV relies on ongoing cash generation and access to credit markets to meet short-term obligations. However, a large portion of current liabilities is deferred revenue ($7.3B), which represents future obligations to deliver events, not debt. The quick ratio of 0.85 is similar, indicating that inventory is not a major factor. Under a severe stress scenario, the cash balance provides a buffer, but the negative working capital position could become problematic if event cancellations trigger refunds.
Misapplied Metric: EV/EBITDA
EV/EBITDA is commonly used for LYV, but its extreme quarterly swings—from 9.8x to 75.1x D/EBITDA—make it unreliable, per reported data, obscuring the true leverage and earnings power.
EV/EBITDA fails to capture the seasonality of LYV's business, as EBITDA is heavily concentrated in Q2 and Q3. A trailing multiple based on a single quarter can be misleading; for example, 2025Q4 D/EBITDA of 75.1x would suggest severe overvaluation, while 2025Q3 at 9.8x appears reasonable. Instead, investors should use a normalized EBITDA figure, such as a trailing twelve-month average or a forward estimate that smooths seasonality. Additionally, EV/EBITDA ignores the significant deferred revenue liability, which is a real obligation. A more appropriate metric might be EV/EBITDAR (adding back rent) or a multiple of free cash flow normalized over a full year.