Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 22.8x · EV/EBITDA 20.2x · ROE 17.1%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.9B | $2.5B | $2.3B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $2.4B | $3.0B | $429M | $187M | $91M | $346M |
| Enterprise Value | $4.0B | $2.6B | $2.5B | $1.6B | $1.9B | $3.0B | $2.9B | $363M | $107M | $15M | $197M |
| P/E Ratio → | 22.84 | 17.08 | 99.50 | — | — | 35000.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.12 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 2.06 | 2.44 | 5.09 | 13.40 | 2.74 | 1.50 | 0.59 | 1.24 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.57 | 2.71 | 3.04 | 1.82 | 1.78 | 2.71 | 7.78 | 3.84 | 1.59 | 0.56 | 1.16 |
| P/FCF | 16.90 | 15.07 | 11.55 | 7.21 | 9.50 | 24.47 | — | 35.50 | — | — | 12.96 |
| P/OCF | 16.61 | 10.57 | 9.94 | 5.95 | 7.31 | 18.84 | — | 13.42 | — | 4.24 | 5.76 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.60 | 3.69 | 2.51 | 3.28 | 6.33 | 13.06 | 2.32 | 0.86 | 0.09 | 0.71 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.18 | 16.96 | 22.47 | 18.14 | 18.35 | 45.03 | — | 79.89 | — | — | 11.01 |
| EV / EBIT | 40.87 | 28.68 | 46.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.51 | 12.17 | 8.79 | 12.79 | 30.41 | — | 30.01 | — | — | 7.36 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 62.7% | 62.7% | 61.3% | 33.9% | 46.8% | 56.9% | 64.9% | 63.3% | 51.9% | 63.5% | 73.7% |
| Operating Margin | 13.7% | 13.7% | 7.6% | -25.0% | -19.5% | -17.3% | -24.5% | -17.6% | -51.0% | -100.9% | -8.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 20.3% | 20.3% | 3.4% | -25.7% | -22.6% | 0.0% | -24.1% | -16.3% | -49.6% | -99.5% | -6.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.1% | 17.1% | 3.1% | -21.3% | -15.6% | 0.0% | -21.7% | -22.2% | -43.7% | -66.7% | -6.3% |
| ROA | 4.8% | 4.8% | 0.8% | -5.9% | -4.8% | 0.0% | -8.0% | -6.7% | -16.6% | -34.3% | -3.4% |
| ROIC | 7.8% | 7.8% | 4.1% | -10.3% | -6.2% | -6.9% | -23.1% | -49.8% | -76.0% | -98.9% | -12.0% |
| ROCE | 7.3% | 7.3% | 3.9% | -10.8% | -6.9% | -7.7% | -19.9% | -22.4% | -44.6% | -67.1% | -8.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 1.03 | 0.92 | 0.11 | 0.20 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.14 | 4.14 | 5.56 | 7.07 | 7.88 | 12.30 | — | 4.96 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.40 | 0.62 | 0.66 | -0.20 | -0.59 | -0.68 | -0.47 | -0.50 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.48 | 0.48 | 1.15 | 3.27 | 4.72 | 8.79 | — | -14.61 | — | — | -8.36 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.44 | 0.62 | 1.58 | 3.29 | 5.94 | — | -5.49 | — | — | -5.59 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.73 | 4.73 | 1.98 | -3.87 | -3.63 | -3.79 | — | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.14 | 1.09 | 1.18 | 1.14 | 1.16 | 1.17 | 1.25 | 1.40 | 1.79 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.14 | 1.09 | 1.18 | 1.14 | 1.16 | 1.17 | 1.25 | 1.40 | 1.79 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.59 | 0.87 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.54 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 665.61 | 655.55 | 692.81 | 617.65 | 722.95 | 776.79 | 507.71 | 602.11 | 389.28 | 251.97 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.4% | 5.9% | 1.0% | — | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 5.9% | 6.6% | 8.7% | 13.9% | 10.5% | 4.1% | — | 2.8% | — | — | 7.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.2% | 1.9% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 1.8% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.2% | 1.9% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 1.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $154M | $147M | $137M | $133M | $136M | $97M | $53M | $50M | $49M | $47M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MGNI stock.
Magnite, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 22.8x. The historical average is 58.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Magnite, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 20.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 29.5x.
Magnite, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 17.1%. The historical average is -24.0%.
Based on historical data, Magnite, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 22.8x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Magnite, Inc. has 62.7% gross margin and 13.7% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Magnite, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Take rate compression from SPO
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiples Imply Sustained CTV Growth
Based on reported figures, Magnite trades at 28.83 trailing P/E and 26.38 EV/EBITDA, falling to 13.57 on forward EBITDA, a compression that implies the market is pricing in substantial near-term earnings expansion rather than current profitability.
The gap between trailing EV/EBITDA of 26.38 and forward EV/EBITDA of 13.57 suggests the market expects EBITDA to roughly double, a step-change that depends on continued CTV mix shift and operating leverage. Relative to The Trade Desk at 14.21 P/E and Criteo near 5.8, Magnite's multiple appears elevated, which may indicate investors are treating it as a growth asset rather than a cyclical ad proxy. Investors should monitor whether forward earnings revisions keep pace with this implied expansion.
Margin Recovery Outpaces Net Earnings Quality
As reported in financial statements, gross margin rose from 59.7% in 2025Q1 to 68.6% in 2026Q3 and operating margin reached 24.8%, while net margin of 16.7% and volatile quarterly net income suggest below-the-line items distort earnings power.
Operating margin expansion from negative 0.9% to 24.8% reflects genuine operating leverage on the CTV-weighted revenue base, yet net margin swings from 59.9% in 2025Q4 to 2.7% in 2026Q1 indicate non-operating or tax items dominate reported bottom-line results. Gross margin of 68.6% remains below The Trade Desk at roughly 78.6% and DoubleVerify near 82%, suggesting Magnite's take-rate structure is structurally less profitable per dollar of spend. Operating margin is therefore the more reliable indicator of earning power than net margin.
Returns Recovering From Near-Zero Base
According to recent SEC filings, ROIC climbed from negative 0.1% in 2025Q1 to 3.8% in 2026Q3, while ROE of 3.6% remains far below Trade Desk's 16.1%, indicating returns are recovering from a depressed base rather than compounding at a high level.
The ROIC trajectory suggests returns are improving, but a 3.8% level remains weak against a goodwill-heavy capital base of roughly $3.1B total assets, implying acquisition-driven capital has yet to generate strong economic returns. The spread between ROE of 3.6% and ROA of 1.1% reflects meaningful leverage amplification, which warrants caution given the debt structure. Sustained ROIC above the cost of capital would require continued margin expansion alongside stable capital deployment.
Deleveraging Improves Coverage But Watch Refinancing
Based on reported figures, debt-to-equity fell from 0.83 in 2025Q1 to 0.43 in 2026Q3 and interest coverage recovered to 7.68, though coverage swung sharply between quarters, from 1.53 to 12.58 within the past year.
The decline in D/E and rise in interest coverage suggest debt service has become more comfortable, consistent with reduced convertible obligations. However, D/EBITDA of 6.39 in the latest quarter remains elevated, and quarterly coverage volatility implies earnings timing rather than a steady cushion. Investors should monitor refinancing terms on remaining debt, as the source data does not fully disclose maturity or covenant structure.
Gross Margin May Overstate Durable Take Rate
Based on reported figures, the most misapplied metric here is gross margin, which may flatter a model where a substantial share of revenue passes to publishers as traffic acquisition cost, obscuring the true net take rate.
Gross margin of 68.6% is calculated on a revenue base that may include gross-up treatment, so it can overstate the economic retention an SSP actually keeps. Revenue ex-TAC provides a more faithful measure of net take, and applying gross margin comparisons against The Trade Desk, a buy-side platform with different accounting, can produce misleading conclusions. Investors should anchor on net take rate and ex-TAC contribution growth instead.