Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -137.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -1.5%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.6B | $2.2B | $2.0B | $3.7B | $3.3B | $9.3B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $659M | $1.2B | $1.1B | $2.8B | $2.2B | $8.1B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -137.92 | — | 72.05 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.59 | 3.51 | 3.88 | 5.50 | 4.45 | 17.97 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.51 | 2.88 | 1.81 | 2.99 | 2.26 | 5.91 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 10.07 | 13.65 | 35.27 | 439.74 | — | 171.41 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 9.95 | 13.50 | 33.80 | 176.13 | — | 163.16 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.98 | 2.08 | 4.07 | 2.89 | 15.59 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 37.63 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 7.68 | 18.95 | 325.69 | — | 148.69 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 11.2% | 11.2% | 69.4% | 48.7% | 42.8% | 44.8% | 40.6% | 42.2% |
| Operating Margin | -4.7% | -4.7% | -4.8% | -41.9% | -28.0% | -31.3% | -16.2% | -41.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -2.2% | -2.2% | 5.4% | -33.0% | -24.7% | -31.7% | -16.4% | -40.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -1.5% | -1.5% | 2.3% | -16.4% | -12.1% | -17.6% | -22.4% | -42.4% |
| ROA | -0.9% | -0.9% | 1.8% | -13.3% | -10.3% | -14.3% | -14.0% | -26.1% |
| ROIC | — | — | -8.1% | -73.1% | -49.0% | -56.9% | -38.7% | -45.6% |
| ROCE | -3.1% | -3.1% | -2.1% | -20.7% | -13.6% | -17.0% | -19.8% | -37.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.14 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -1.26 | -0.84 | -0.78 | -0.80 | -0.78 | -0.70 | -0.30 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -5.97 | -16.32 | -114.05 | — | -22.72 | -4.22 | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($982M) exceeds total debt ($22M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.65 | 1.65 | 3.37 | 4.13 | 6.17 | 7.56 | 3.05 | 3.07 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.65 | 1.65 | 3.36 | 4.11 | 6.16 | 7.54 | 3.05 | 3.07 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.44 | 1.44 | 2.97 | 3.71 | 5.74 | 7.19 | 2.62 | 2.42 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.28 | 0.63 | 0.64 |
| Inventory Turnover | 284.86 | 284.86 | 42.21 | 80.45 | 83.15 | 72.45 | 220.72 | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 73.55 | 85.38 | 58.94 | 39.45 | 39.66 | 52.09 | 67.42 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 1.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 9.9% | 7.3% | 2.8% | 0.2% | — | 0.6% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 24.2% | 17.8% | 7.9% | 5.1% | 2.3% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 24.2% | 17.8% | 7.9% | 5.1% | 2.3% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $116M | $130M | $133M | $136M | $135M | $134M | $134M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MQ stock.
Marqeta, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -137.9x. The historical average is 72.1x.
Marqeta, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -1.5%. The historical average is -15.7%.
Based on historical data, Marqeta, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -137.9x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Marqeta, Inc. has 11.2% gross margin and -4.7% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Client concentration and margin pressure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Gross Margin Volatility Masks Core Economics
Gross margin swung from 18.5% in 2026Q1 to 69.2% in 2026Q2, per SEC filings, reflecting revenue recognition timing and incentive payments, while operating margin turned positive at 2.1%, suggesting early operating leverage.
The extreme quarterly swings in gross margin—from 18.5% to 69.2%—are not indicative of underlying economics but rather the timing of network incentive payments and revenue recognition, as noted in prior income statement analysis. The positive operating margin of 2.1% in 2026Q2, a stark improvement from -27.6% in 2024Q4, suggests that cost discipline is beginning to offset the inherently low take rate. However, the 11.2% gross margin reported in the company intelligence block (likely on a net revenue basis) underscores that Marqeta retains only a thin slice of interchange, making sustained profitability dependent on scale and cost control.
ROIC Swing Signals Transition to Efficiency
ROIC jumped to 88.3% in 2026Q2 from -14.1% in 2024Q4, based on reported figures, driven by a sharp reduction in invested capital and improved operating income, suggesting a shift toward capital efficiency.
The dramatic swing in ROIC from -14.1% to 88.3% is less about operational improvement and more about the denominator: total assets fell from $1.5B to $1.4M (likely a data anomaly or significant divestiture), per balance sheet analysis. Excluding this distortion, the underlying trend is a gradual improvement in operating margins from -42.3% in 2024Q1 to 2.1% in 2026Q2, indicating that the company is moving toward positive returns on a more normalized capital base. Investors should monitor whether this ROIC is sustainable as the company scales, given the low gross margin and competitive pressures.
Working Capital Leverage Distorts Cash Conversion
DPO surged to 219 days in 2026Q2 from 162 days in 2026Q1, per financial statements, while DSO fell to 45 days, suggesting Marqeta is stretching payables and collecting faster, though CCC remains negative.
The negative cash conversion cycle, with DPO exceeding DSO by a wide margin, indicates that Marqeta is effectively using supplier and partner float to fund operations, a common trait in payments infrastructure. However, the volatility in DPO—from 382 days in 2025Q4 to 219 days in 2026Q2—suggests that working capital metrics are heavily influenced by the timing of network incentive payments and settlement cycles, not just operational efficiency. The asset turnover of 0.24x in 2026Q2, up from 0.07x in 2024Q1, reflects the shrinking asset base and may overstate efficiency gains.
Minimal Debt Masks Strategic Flexibility
Debt-to-equity stands at 0.01 with total debt of $6.7K, as reported in SEC filings, indicating a virtually unlevered balance sheet that provides ample capacity for strategic moves or weathering downturns.
With D/E at 0.01 and interest coverage not meaningful due to negligible debt, Marqeta's balance sheet is a fortress from a leverage perspective, consistent with prior balance sheet analysis. The company's $691.4K cash (though down from $981.8M in 2025Q4, likely a data scaling issue) and minimal debt suggest that refinancing risk is nonexistent. However, the lack of leverage also implies that the company is not using debt to amplify returns, which may be appropriate given its negative profitability history.
Liquidity Buffer Thins but Remains Adequate
Current ratio fell to 1.66 in 2026Q2 from 3.98 in 2024Q1, per reported data, while cash dropped to $691.4K, indicating a reduced but still sufficient buffer against short-term obligations.
The current ratio of 1.66, while down from 3.98, remains above 1.5, suggesting that Marqeta can cover short-term liabilities with current assets, though the buffer has thinned. The quick ratio equals the current ratio at 1.66, indicating that inventory is not a factor, consistent with a software/payments model. However, the sharp decline in cash from $981.8M to $691.4K (likely a data anomaly) and the acceleration of buybacks ($54.7M in 2026Q2) suggest that management is deploying cash, which could reduce liquidity under stress. Investors should monitor whether the cash position stabilizes.
Gross Margin Misapplied as Profitability Proxy
The most misapplied ratio for Marqeta is gross margin, which swings from 18.5% to 70.1% due to revenue recognition timing, per SEC filings, obscuring the true take rate and unit economics.
Analysts often compare Marqeta's gross margin to SaaS peers, but this is misleading because the company operates on a pass-through model where network fees and interchange are recorded as revenue, inflating the top line. The reported gross margin of 11.2% (on a net revenue basis) is a more accurate reflection of the company's economic footprint, as noted in company intelligence. Instead of gross margin, investors should focus on net revenue per transaction (take rate) and contribution margin after variable costs, which better capture pricing power and scalability. The volatility in gross margin also highlights the need to adjust for incentive payments and timing to assess underlying profitability.