Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 9.3x · EV/EBITDA 6.9x · ROE 88.3%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $779.3B | $1.10T | $137.3B | $106.8B | $76.4B | $64.3B | $84.4B | $52.4B | $51.1B | $64.8B | $36.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $746.1B | $1.06T | $142.9B | $113.8B | $81.8B | $63.6B | $83.9B | $52.0B | $49.8B | $63.0B | $42.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 9.31 | 12.89 | 16.07 | 136.53 | — | 7.40 | 14.39 | 19.55 | 8.09 | 4.59 | 7.25 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.85 | 8.22 | 3.67 | 4.25 | 4.92 | 2.09 | 3.05 | 2.44 | 2.18 | 2.13 | 1.82 |
| P/B Ratio | 5.70 | 7.91 | 2.53 | 2.37 | 1.73 | 1.29 | 1.92 | 1.34 | 1.39 | 1.96 | 1.89 |
| P/FCF | 13.22 | 18.57 | 82.28 | 883.04 | — | 20.65 | 34.63 | 631.32 | 15.31 | 7.80 | 12.72 |
| P/OCF | 8.69 | 12.21 | 7.83 | 12.56 | 49.03 | 4.24 | 6.77 | 6.31 | 3.87 | 3.73 | 4.53 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 7.97 | 3.82 | 4.53 | 5.26 | 2.07 | 3.03 | 2.42 | 2.13 | 2.07 | 2.11 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.85 | 9.76 | 7.84 | 12.53 | 40.68 | 3.78 | 6.72 | 6.00 | 3.89 | 3.19 | 4.41 |
| EV / EBIT | 7.51 | 10.69 | 14.09 | 91.34 | — | 6.55 | 12.35 | 16.98 | 6.73 | 4.22 | 7.31 |
| EV / FCF | — | 18.01 | 85.66 | 940.61 | — | 20.41 | 34.43 | 625.92 | 14.92 | 7.57 | 14.81 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 80.7% | 80.7% | 39.8% | 22.4% | -9.1% | 45.2% | 37.6% | 30.6% | 45.7% | 58.9% | 41.5% |
| Operating Margin | 74.6% | 74.6% | 26.4% | 5.2% | -37.0% | 31.5% | 22.7% | 14.0% | 31.5% | 49.3% | 28.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 63.8% | 63.8% | 22.8% | 3.1% | -37.5% | 28.2% | 21.2% | 12.5% | 27.0% | 46.5% | 25.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 88.3% | 88.3% | 17.2% | 1.7% | -12.4% | 18.5% | 14.1% | 7.1% | 18.1% | 53.7% | 31.4% |
| ROA | 61.0% | 61.0% | 11.2% | 1.2% | -8.9% | 13.9% | 10.4% | 5.2% | 13.7% | 35.9% | 16.2% |
| ROIC | 90.3% | 90.3% | 13.2% | 1.9% | -8.7% | 15.7% | 11.5% | 6.1% | 16.6% | 39.6% | 19.9% |
| ROCE | 82.9% | 82.9% | 15.0% | 2.2% | -9.7% | 17.5% | 12.6% | 6.7% | 18.4% | 44.3% | 22.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.57 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.84 | 1.54 | 6.93 | 0.45 | 0.58 | 0.83 | 0.46 | 0.23 | 1.15 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.24 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.12 | -0.01 | -0.01 | -0.01 | -0.04 | -0.06 | 0.31 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.30 | -0.30 | 0.31 | 0.77 | 2.66 | -0.04 | -0.04 | -0.05 | -0.10 | -0.09 | 0.62 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.56 | 3.38 | 57.57 | — | -0.24 | -0.20 | -5.40 | -0.39 | -0.22 | 2.08 |
| Interest Coverage | 937.17 | 937.17 | 21.26 | 2.22 | -14.07 | 51.37 | 37.14 | 15.77 | 57.73 | 43.64 | 9.78 |
Net cash position: cash ($38.4B) exceeds total debt ($5.2B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.31 | 3.31 | 2.52 | 2.64 | 4.46 | 2.89 | 3.10 | 2.71 | 2.58 | 2.79 | 2.34 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.94 | 2.94 | 1.79 | 1.68 | 2.70 | 2.01 | 2.40 | 1.86 | 1.78 | 2.16 | 1.75 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.58 | 1.58 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 2.01 | 1.24 | 1.34 | 1.23 | 1.24 | 1.18 | 1.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.68 | 0.45 | 0.36 | 0.24 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.40 | 0.48 | 0.70 | 0.58 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.48 | 2.48 | 2.69 | 2.20 | 2.02 | 2.53 | 3.85 | 2.65 | 2.48 | 3.48 | 3.81 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 99.20 | 90.47 | 96.15 | 57.38 | 60.88 | 69.97 | 66.61 | 49.82 | 65.79 | 67.51 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 0.7% | 0.7% | 6.1% | 65.9% | — | 5.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 10.7% | 7.8% | 6.2% | 0.7% | — | 13.5% | 6.9% | 5.1% | 12.4% | 21.8% | 13.8% |
| FCF Yield | 7.6% | 5.4% | 1.2% | 0.1% | — | 4.8% | 2.9% | 0.2% | 6.5% | 12.8% | 7.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.6% | 3.8% | 1.4% | 0.3% | 5.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.8% | 1.2% | 4.5% | 1.4% | 0.3% | 5.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.2B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
Bull/bear thesis, analyst target revisions, and earnings execution.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MU stock.
Micron Technology, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 9.3x. The historical average is 25.2x. This places it at the 32th percentile of its historical range.
Micron Technology, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 6.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.6x.
Micron Technology, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 88.3%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 8.8%.
Based on historical data, Micron Technology, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 9.3x. This is at the 32th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Micron Technology, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.08% with a payout ratio of 0.7%.
Micron Technology, Inc. has 80.7% gross margin and 74.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Micron Technology, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cyclical gross margin normalization in memory downcycle
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Gross Margin at Unprecedented Cyclical Peak
Micron's gross margin has surged from 26.9% in 2024Q3 to 86.8% in 2026Q4, with net margin reaching 69.5% and operating margin 80.7%, according to the company's reported quarterly results; this scale of pricing-driven expansion appears far too extreme to represent a durable structural margin profile.
The reported figures show operating margin climbing from 10.6% to 80.7% while SG&A grew roughly three-fold against an eight-fold revenue increase, which implies the current margin level is being produced by exceptional fixed-cost leverage at high fab utilization rather than by permanent cost advantages. Because reported gross margin in memory companies is mechanically flattered by reversals of prior lower-of-cost-or-market inventory write-downs, and because SBC has risen 73% to $379 million per quarter, the metric most reflective of true earning power is likely a mid-cycle normalized margin rather than the 2026Q4 peak. Investors should assume the reported 69.5% net margin is a cyclical extreme and test durability against bit-cost reduction rates rather than treat it as run-rate earning power.
Returns Compounding Far Beyond Cost of Capital
Based on Micron's reported ratios, ROIC has expanded from 1.1% in 2024Q3 to 35.1% in 2026Q4 and ROE from 0.8% to 31.5%, with ROA reaching 22.8%, indicating the return improvement has been driven roughly as much by a tripling of asset turnover to 0.33 as by the margin surge.
The fact that ROIC of 35.1% now exceeds ROE of 31.5% while debt-to-equity sits at 0.03 is analytically meaningful: it suggests the return expansion is almost entirely operating-driven rather than amplified by financial leverage, which makes the current return level look genuinely earned rather than engineered through balance sheet risk. However, net property, plant and equipment has risen 64% to $63.3 billion for the domestic fab buildout, and this depreciating asset base will dilute returns as depreciation catches up to depreciation schedules and as capacity comes online regardless of pricing conditions. The prudent read is that Micron is compounding returns at a genuine upcycle peak, but that the direction of travel for ROIC from this base is more likely downward as the capex pipeline earns its return.
Working Capital Cycle Collapses to 38 Days
As disclosed in Micron's working capital data, the cash conversion cycle compressed from 183 days in 2024Q3 to 38 days in 2026Q3, with inventory days falling to 129 from 155 and days sales outstanding narrowing to 61 from 63, signaling far tighter supply-demand balance and faster sell-through.
The simultaneous decline in inventory days alongside the reported $15.4 billion working capital outflow in 2026Q3 suggests that absolute inventory is still accumulating to support the HBM3E and DDR5 transition even as relative sell-through improves — a combination that implies Micron is building ahead of demand in the expectation of sustained pricing rather than clearing existing stock. Days payable outstanding are unavailable in the most recent quarter, so no conclusion can be drawn about the latest-quarter supplier leverage or the true latest-cycle conversion length. Notably, the 2026Q3 DPO of 134 days sits far outside the 35–45 day historical range, which distorts that quarter's CCC of 38 days and means the reported improvement in cash conversion should be treated as directionally positive but not quantitatively reliable.
Debt Retired as Leverage Falls to 0.03
As disclosed in Micron's quarterly balance sheets, debt-to-equity has fallen from 0.31 in 2024Q3 to 0.03 in 2026Q4 and debt-to-EBITDA from 5.19x to 0.11x, with total debt reduced to $4.7 billion against $38.4 billion of cash and equivalents.
The leverage profile has moved from cyclical peak-risk territory to a level that would ordinarily signal negligible refinancing or covenant concern, suggesting that the upcycle has been used to de-lever rather than lever into the Idaho and New York fab expansion. Interest coverage data are unavailable for the most recent four quarters, so the current servicing comfort cannot be directly verified, though the cash-to-debt ratio of more than eight to one appears to make it a non-issue based on reported figures. The more analytically relevant concern is the mirror image: at 0.11x debt-to-EBITDA on peak-cycle earnings, the ratio provides a false sense of how much debt capacity the business would need in a downturn, and investors should evaluate leverage against trough-cycle EBITDA rather than the current inflated denominator.
Trailing Multiples Distorted by Cyclical Earnings
According to current market pricing, Micron trades at a trailing P/E of 140.33 and a P/FCF of 721.18 against a forward P/E of 14.45 and forward EV/EBITDA of 11.33, a roughly ten-fold gap that suggests investors are underwriting sustained rather than cyclical earnings levels.
The divergence between the trailing and forward multiples is the central valuation fact here: the trailing P/E of 140.33 and trailing EV/EBITDA of 66.32 reflect an earnings base that is itself at an apparent cyclical extreme, while the forward multiples of 14.45 and 11.33 embed an assumption that the current margin regime persists for another full year. A PEG of 5.35 indicates that even the forward earnings trajectory is being priced at a substantial premium relative to implied growth, and the absence of management guidance in the most recent quarter leaves that growth assumption without company validation. The P/S of 32.18 and P/B of 22.12 further suggest the market is pricing Micron more like a high-growth logic company than a deep-cycle memory manufacturer, which warrants caution given that reported figures show revenue growth decelerating to 3.8% year-over-year in the latest quarter.
Price-to-Earnings at the Memory Earnings Peak
The trailing P/E of 140.33, per current market pricing, is the ratio most routinely misapplied to memory makers: it looks maximally expensive at an earnings peak and maximally cheap at a trough, obscuring the fact that normalized mid-cycle returns on capital are the actual valuation anchor.
Applying a trailing P/E to a company whose reported gross margin has moved from 26.9% to 86.8% in ten quarters produces a number that reflects the cycle position rather than business value, which is precisely why the same company would screen as a value play at the bottom of a memory downcycle on identical fundamentals. The P/B of 22.12 compounds the distortion because reported equity has grown 213% to $138.4 billion partly on inventory reversal effects and depreciation assumptions that may not be repeatable, so the book-value denominator is itself cyclical. The more defensible approach is to use a mid-cycle normalized EPS or an EV/EBITDA averaged across a full pricing cycle, cross-referenced with normalized ROIC, since the forward P/E of 14.45 currently assumes that the 35.1% ROIC is sustainable — an assumption historical memory cycles have repeatedly invalidated.