Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -21.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -28.3%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.3B | $4.0B | $2.4B | $918M | $207M | $173M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $3.8B | $3.5B | $1.7B | $577M | $-260870039 | $113M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -21.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 192.16 | 178.34 | 53.22 | 65.13 | 2.01 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 6.19 | 5.87 | 3.20 | 3.18 | 0.48 | 3.06 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | 19.79 | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | 19.38 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 156.57 | 36.29 | 40.98 | -2.54 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | -24.98 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 99.7% | 99.7% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -1002.9% | -1002.9% | -386.9% | -1298.6% | -3.5% | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -905.7% | -905.7% | -530.3% | -1255.8% | -22.0% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -28.3% | -28.3% | -46.2% | -49.3% | -9.3% | -45.4% | -5.5% |
| ROA | -24.9% | -24.9% | -39.9% | -42.9% | -8.3% | -40.2% | -5.0% |
| ROIC | -188.2% | -188.2% | — | — | — | -42.8% | — |
| ROCE | -31.3% | -31.3% | -33.4% | -49.5% | -1.4% | -35.6% | -4.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.72 | -1.02 | -1.18 | -1.09 | -1.06 | -0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | -44.77 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | -26.02 | -77.86 | -100.67 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($490M) exceeds total debt ($202000)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 7.88 | 7.88 | 8.08 | 6.95 | 13.26 | 5.96 | 7.90 |
| Quick Ratio | 7.88 | 7.88 | 8.08 | 6.95 | 13.26 | 5.96 | 7.90 |
| Cash Ratio | 7.42 | 7.42 | 7.80 | 6.82 | 12.97 | 5.37 | 5.77 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.21 | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 375.53 | 170.67 | 48.73 | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | 5.1% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $114M | $94M | $82M | $19M | $18M | $18M |
Binary clinical trial outcomes
According to current market data, NAMS trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 172.68, a figure that appears to price in significant future commercial success rather than current operational performance, as reported in recent financial filings which highlight the company's reliance on non-recurring milestone-based revenue streams.
The elevated P/S multiple suggests that investors are valuing the company based on the potential peak sales of obicetrapib rather than existing financial output. This valuation warrants further investigation, as it implies a high degree of confidence in the upcoming MACE trial results, which will ultimately dictate whether this premium is justified or if the stock faces significant multiple compression.
Based on reported figures, NAMS's ROIC has consistently trended in negative territory, reaching -21.8% in 2026Q1, which underscores the substantial capital intensity required to fund late-stage clinical development before the company achieves any meaningful, recurring commercial return on its invested capital base.
The persistent decay in return metrics is a standard characteristic of a pre-revenue biotech firm, yet it highlights the risk that current capital allocation may not yield positive returns if regulatory hurdles are not cleared. Investors should monitor whether the company can transition from this capital-consuming phase to a self-sustaining model, as the current negative ROIC is structurally tied to the heavy R&D burden.
As indicated by the most recent quarterly data, NAMS maintains a current ratio of 9.76, suggesting that the company possesses a robust liquidity buffer to support its ongoing Phase 3 cardiovascular outcomes trials through the near-term data release cycle without immediate need for dilutive financing.
This liquidity position appears adequate to navigate the binary risks associated with the PREVAIL, BROADWAY, and BROOKLYN trials. However, the high current ratio should not be mistaken for operational health, as it primarily reflects the cash-heavy balance sheet resulting from previous capital raises rather than efficient working capital management.
While reported gross margins often exceed 99%, this metric is frequently misapplied to NAMS, as it reflects the accounting treatment of milestone payments rather than the true cost of goods sold that would be expected in a commercial-stage pharmaceutical manufacturing environment.
Investors should ignore this headline margin when forecasting future profitability, as it fails to account for the eventual royalties and manufacturing costs that will emerge upon commercialization. A more accurate assessment of the company's future earning power requires adjusting for these anticipated costs, which will likely compress margins significantly from their current, artificially high levels.
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NAMS stock.
NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V.'s current P/E ratio is -21.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V.'s return on equity (ROE) is -28.3%. The historical average is -30.7%.
Based on historical data, NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. is trading at a P/E of -21.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. has 99.7% gross margin and -1002.9% operating margin.