Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 17.2x · EV/EBITDA 14.6x · ROE 4.2%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $253M | $367M | $221M | $273M | $280M | $261M | $186M | $328M | $236M | $259M | $142M |
| Enterprise Value | $312M | $426M | $259M | $233M | $197M | $205M | $155M | $243M | $162M | $215M | $197M |
| P/E Ratio → | 17.17 | 20.87 | 6.55 | — | 3.78 | 5.42 | 12.52 | 8.27 | 6.78 | 8.54 | 4.79 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.90 | 1.32 | 0.93 | 1.27 | 1.16 | 1.36 | 1.45 | 2.33 | 1.74 | 2.47 | 0.17 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.59 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.62 | 1.13 | 0.94 | 1.18 | 0.64 |
| P/FCF | — | 160.63 | — | 30.05 | 11.11 | 7.32 | — | 11.67 | 7.00 | 10.11 | 1.82 |
| P/OCF | 4.98 | 7.21 | 9.92 | 5.01 | 4.14 | 3.48 | — | 6.22 | 4.32 | 6.26 | 1.51 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.54 | 1.09 | 1.08 | 0.81 | 1.07 | 1.21 | 1.72 | 1.19 | 2.05 | 0.23 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.63 | — | 4.29 | — | 2.03 | 2.62 | 4.90 | 4.41 | 2.77 | 4.72 | 3.61 |
| EV / EBIT | — | 22.54 | 6.60 | — | 2.19 | 3.51 | 9.92 | 5.48 | — | 6.62 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 186.52 | — | 25.61 | 7.80 | 5.76 | — | 8.63 | 4.80 | 8.41 | 2.54 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 13.6% | 13.6% | 12.5% | 6.8% | 28.1% | 22.6% | 13.2% | 22.1% | 22.1% | 16.1% | 24.0% |
| Operating Margin | -14.5% | -14.5% | 15.0% | -32.7% | 29.0% | 28.9% | 10.5% | 27.5% | 32.2% | 31.3% | 4.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.3% | 6.3% | 14.2% | -18.4% | 30.7% | 25.1% | 11.5% | 28.1% | 25.7% | 29.0% | 3.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.2% | 4.2% | 8.6% | -9.8% | 19.0% | 14.7% | 5.0% | 14.7% | 14.8% | 13.8% | 14.1% |
| ROA | 2.7% | 2.7% | 5.8% | -7.1% | 13.8% | 9.8% | 3.2% | 9.6% | 9.1% | 5.7% | 4.5% |
| ROIC | -6.5% | -6.5% | 6.8% | -15.3% | 16.4% | 14.7% | 4.3% | 15.3% | 18.6% | 10.9% | 10.5% |
| ROCE | -6.9% | -6.9% | 6.9% | -14.1% | 14.2% | 12.5% | 3.3% | 10.8% | 13.0% | 8.4% | 9.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.26 | 0.62 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 1.83 | — | 0.28 | 0.39 | 1.83 | 0.68 | 0.19 | 1.28 | 2.49 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.14 | 0.09 | -0.11 | -0.20 | -0.16 | -0.10 | -0.30 | -0.30 | -0.20 | 0.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.62 | — | -0.86 | -0.71 | -0.98 | -1.55 | -1.27 | -0.95 | 1.02 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 25.89 | — | -4.45 | -3.31 | -1.56 | — | -3.04 | -2.20 | -1.70 | 0.72 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.28 | 3.28 | 7.04 | -25.08 | 44.13 | 34.07 | 11.53 | 50.77 | -11.43 | 9.46 | -0.55 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.09 | 3.09 | 4.08 | 3.31 | 5.88 | 4.41 | 3.60 | 3.24 | 3.89 | 3.28 | 1.72 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.17 | 2.17 | 2.62 | 2.21 | 4.27 | 3.24 | 2.69 | 2.59 | 3.15 | 2.72 | 1.01 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.12 | 1.22 | 2.50 | 1.87 | 1.69 | 1.98 | 2.02 | 1.88 | 0.36 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.42 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.38 | 0.27 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 1.28 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.76 | 3.76 | 2.20 | 2.60 | 2.43 | 2.74 | 2.34 | 2.71 | 3.38 | 2.93 | 4.13 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 65.61 | 85.22 | 76.96 | 91.00 | 88.14 | 117.30 | 56.58 | 77.69 | 120.29 | 8.86 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.9% | 2.0% | 3.0% | 2.4% | 2.1% | 2.2% | 2.9% | 1.6% | 1.9% | 2.6% | 5.1% |
| Payout Ratio | 41.7% | 41.7% | 19.6% | — | 8.1% | 11.7% | 36.3% | 12.9% | 13.2% | 22.0% | 24.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.8% | 4.8% | 15.3% | — | 26.5% | 18.4% | 8.0% | 12.1% | 14.7% | 11.7% | 20.9% |
| FCF Yield | — | 0.6% | — | 3.3% | 9.0% | 13.7% | — | 8.6% | 14.3% | 9.9% | 54.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.0% | 0.7% | 4.5% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 4.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.9% | 2.7% | 7.5% | 3.5% | 2.1% | 2.2% | 3.4% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.6% | 9.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $7M | $7M | $7M | $7M | $7M | $7M | $7M | $7M | $7M | $7M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NC stock.
NACCO Industries, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 17.2x. The historical average is 3.7x. This places it at the 96th percentile of its historical range.
NACCO Industries, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 14.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 2.7x.
NACCO Industries, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 4.2%. The historical average is 8.1%.
Based on historical data, NACCO Industries, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 17.2x. This is at the 96th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
NACCO Industries, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.88% with a payout ratio of 41.7%.
NACCO Industries, Inc. has 13.6% gross margin and -14.5% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Capital intensity without operating returns
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Book Discount Masks Earnings Distortion
NACCO's 0.61 price-to-book and 0.84 forward EV/EBITDA look like classic deep-value coal signals, yet the 113.52 price-to-free-cash-flow multiple and 14.80 trailing P/E versus 1.20 forward P/E reveal a market that has effectively stopped underwriting reported earnings.
The 12x gap between trailing and forward P/E is not a growth story; it is an earnings-quality discount, since the trailing figure is inflated by non-operating items that prior income statement work identified (for example, $8.8 million of net income against -$5.6 million of operating income in 2026Q1). At 0.61x book, the market appears to be pricing NACCO's $436 million of equity at a substantial discount, which for a coal operator typically signals skepticism about the recoverability of long-lived PPE now sitting at 44% of assets rather than an overtaken-asset opportunity. The 12% dividend yield premium versus a 2.8% payout, read together with the P/FCF of 113, suggests the distribution is being funded from the balance sheet rather than current cash generation, an inference investors should weigh against the $45.5 million cash balance reported in 2026Q2.
Gross Margin Volatile, Operating Loss Persistent
Operating margin has been negative for six consecutive quarters through 2026Q2, ending at -3.1%, even as gross margin swung from 9.6% in 2025Q2 to 21.0% in 2026Q2, indicating that pricing recovery has failed to translate into operating leverage.
The gross margin range of 9.6%–22.5% over ten quarters is consistent with a price-taker exposed to seaborne and domestic thermal coal realizations, but the more telling signal is that SG&A has exceeded gross profit for six straight quarters, per the income statement analysis. That structural gap implies the current cost base was built for a revenue run-rate the business no longer supports, and that any further margin compression at the gross line flows directly to operating losses. Adjusting for non-recurring tax benefits and other below-the-line items, the sustainable earning power appears materially weaker than the positive net margins shown in 2025Q3 (17.3%) and 2026Q1 (14.1%), which were both realized against operating losses.
ROIC Decays as Asset Base Expands
ROIC has fallen from a peak of 3.7% in 2024Q3 to -0.3% in 2026Q2, while total assets grew 26% to $677.5 million, a combination that indicates NACCO is destroying rather than compounding returns on invested capital.
Even at its 3.7% peak, ROIC sat well below what coal peers like Alliance Resource (12.9% ROIC) generate, so the recent slide into negative territory widens a gap that appears structural rather than cyclical. The drivers are margin, not efficiency: asset turnover has held flat near 0.10–0.12 across all ten quarters, meaning the incremental $146 million of assets added since 2024Q1 (including the debt-funded PPE build) has not generated incremental revenue. With the replacement capex ratio running at 2.4x D&A per the cash flow analysis, the compounding math turns unfavorable—capital is being deployed at rates below its cost, and the negative ROA of -0.1% in 2026Q2 confirms the deterioration reaches the total asset base, not just the equity slice.
Modest Debt Ratio Hides Coverage Collapse
While NACCO's D/E of 0.29 in 2026Q2 appears conservative in absolute terms, interest coverage has swung from 14.80x in 2024Q3 to -1.45x in 2026Q2, reflecting a denominator problem that headline leverage ratios obscure.
The coverage breakdown is driven by EBITDA erosion rather than a debt spike alone; total debt roughly doubled from $57.8 million to $127.1 million, but the swing in coverage from double digits to negative territory is mostly the operating loss side of the ledger. For a cyclical commodity producer, a 0.29 D/E that already exceeds peer Alliance Resource's 0.26 while generating negative EBITDA implies less refinancing flexibility than the ratio suggests, particularly as NACCO's debt was raised to fund long-lived PPE rather than counter-cyclical acquisitions. Investors should monitor whether the reported D/EBITDA of 33.07 in 2026Q2 normalizes as coal prices recover, because if operating losses persist through another quarter, even this modest debt load begins to look like a constraint on the $2.8%-yielding distribution.
Trailing P/E Misreads a Cyclicality Trap
The trailing P/E of 14.80 is the ratio most likely to mislead here, because NACCO's reported net income has been repeatedly rescued by non-operating items that the operating line does not corroborate.
Standard P/E analysis assumes net income approximates recurring earning power, but as the income statement work shows, NACCO posted positive net margins of 14.1% and 17.3% in quarters where operating margins were -8.9% and -12.7% respectively. Applying a normal multiple to that denominator understates effective valuation and misses that the market's own 1.20 forward P/E appears to reflect the same skepticism. A more informative lens for this business model would be EV/EBITDA on a mid-cycle basis paired with reserve life and realized price decks, or alternatively price-to-replacement-cost of PPE, since book value for coal operators is anchored to historical-cost reserves and depleting assets that bear limited relationship to in-situ coal value. The 0.61 P/B should therefore be read as a signal about asset quality and depletion assumptions, not a standalone margin-of-safety metric.