Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -45.7x · EV/EBITDA 29.1x · ROE -0.4%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.6B | $2.0B | $1.3B | $2.8B | $3.3B | $2.9B | $4.9B | $3.8B | $3.0B | $4.0B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $3.2B | $2.6B | $2.1B | $3.6B | $4.0B | $2.8B | $4.9B | $3.7B | $2.9B | $3.9B | $2.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | -45.71 | — | — | — | — | 58.80 | 80.96 | 63.59 | 49.42 | 63.08 | 55.21 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.90 | 2.24 | 1.42 | 3.08 | 4.02 | 5.42 | 10.55 | 9.00 | 7.13 | 9.93 | 6.78 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.22 | 0.93 | 0.61 | 0.91 | 1.05 | 3.22 | 5.88 | 5.19 | 4.63 | 7.05 | 5.15 |
| P/FCF | 51.45 | 61.16 | — | — | — | 65.54 | 90.91 | 60.89 | 60.06 | 81.99 | 53.16 |
| P/OCF | 30.77 | 23.45 | 21.82 | 80.73 | 80.52 | 42.01 | 60.96 | 43.84 | 46.26 | 57.14 | 40.30 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.94 | 2.30 | 3.88 | 4.91 | 5.34 | 10.39 | 8.85 | 7.03 | 9.72 | 6.56 |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.07 | 27.02 | 15.21 | 18.03 | 31.55 | 34.00 | 51.14 | 43.06 | 33.97 | 44.32 | 29.53 |
| EV / EBIT | — | 52.66 | — | 58.37 | 119.04 | 46.73 | 64.69 | 51.16 | 39.91 | 52.64 | 35.27 |
| EV / FCF | — | 80.22 | — | — | — | 64.52 | 89.55 | 59.84 | 59.21 | 80.26 | 51.47 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 46.9% | 46.9% | 47.1% | 50.1% | 49.4% | 46.1% | 45.9% | 46.9% | 46.3% | 46.8% | 47.1% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | -2.5% | 1.1% | 8.4% | 4.6% | 11.1% | 15.8% | 16.1% | 16.4% | 17.6% | 18.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -0.9% | -0.9% | -122.1% | -1.0% | -2.8% | 9.2% | 13.0% | 14.2% | 14.5% | 15.9% | 12.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -0.4% | -0.4% | -41.9% | -0.3% | -1.1% | 5.6% | 7.8% | 8.7% | 10.0% | 12.2% | 10.0% |
| ROA | -0.2% | -0.2% | -27.3% | -0.2% | -0.8% | 5.1% | 7.1% | 8.0% | 9.2% | 11.0% | 8.9% |
| ROIC | -0.6% | -0.6% | 0.2% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 5.5% | 7.8% | 8.1% | 9.5% | 12.1% | 13.1% |
| ROCE | -0.7% | -0.7% | 0.2% | 1.8% | 1.4% | 6.6% | 9.2% | 9.6% | 11.0% | 13.1% | 14.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.29 | 0.29 | — | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 8.38 | 8.38 | 6.76 | 4.56 | 7.01 | — | 0.01 | 0.01 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.29 | 0.38 | 0.23 | 0.23 | -0.05 | -0.09 | -0.09 | -0.07 | -0.15 | -0.16 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.42 | 6.42 | 5.80 | 3.70 | 5.74 | -0.54 | -0.78 | -0.76 | -0.49 | -0.95 | -0.97 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 19.07 | — | — | — | -1.02 | -1.37 | -1.05 | -0.85 | -1.72 | -1.70 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.84 | 0.84 | -14.85 | 0.84 | 0.61 | 836.21 | 964.97 | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.82 | 3.82 | 3.32 | 3.82 | 4.03 | 8.05 | 11.03 | 11.08 | 11.75 | 9.71 | 8.14 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.91 | 2.91 | 2.22 | 2.59 | 3.11 | 6.48 | 9.16 | 9.12 | 9.50 | 7.75 | 6.11 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.17 | 1.17 | 0.74 | 1.11 | 1.69 | 4.90 | 7.11 | 7.09 | 6.99 | 5.45 | 3.99 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.68 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.20 | 3.20 | 2.48 | 2.44 | 3.11 | 2.32 | 2.52 | 2.33 | 2.58 | 2.78 | 2.59 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 61.56 | 62.58 | 68.32 | 68.01 | 69.01 | 71.54 | 73.91 | 72.78 | 72.54 | 69.86 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 1.7% | 1.2% | 1.6% | 2.0% | 1.6% | 1.8% |
| FCF Yield | 1.9% | 1.6% | — | — | — | 1.5% | 1.1% | 1.6% | 1.7% | 1.2% | 1.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $218M | $217M | $216M | $189M | $108M | $107M | $106M | $105M | $104M | $102M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NEOG stock.
Neogen Corporation's current P/E ratio is -45.7x. The historical average is 38.9x.
Neogen Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 29.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 23.4x.
Neogen Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -0.4%. The historical average is 8.0%.
Based on historical data, Neogen Corporation is trading at a P/E of -45.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Neogen Corporation has 46.9% gross margin and -2.5% operating margin.
Neogen Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 8.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Goodwill impairment and weak coverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Gross Margin Recovery Fails to Convert
Gross margin has recovered to 47.4% in 2027Q1, yet operating margin sits at -0.8% and net margin at -5.3%, according to Neogen's trailing ten-quarter ratio data, indicating that overhead absorption rather than unit economics remains the binding constraint on profitability.
The roughly 900 basis point recovery from the 38.8% trough in 2025Q2 suggests the merger-related inventory step-up charges have largely rolled off, and the 2027Q1 gross base sits essentially at the 47.9% level reported in 2024Q4, so pricing power on the diagnostic consumable franchise appears intact. However, SG&A has consumed an estimated 87% to 148% of gross profit across the trailing ten quarters, leaving operating income at breakeven or worse in six of the last eight reported periods; if integration costs were genuinely transitional, operating leverage should already be visible, and its continued absence would suggest the cost structure is more structural than the market's 38.58x forward earnings multiple appears to assume.
Returns Depressed Below Cost of Capital
ROIC has hovered between -0.4% and 0.3% for ten consecutive quarters while ROE swung to -25.9% in 2025Q4 before settling near -0.6%, per the company's reported ratio data, implying that the roughly $3.3 billion asset base is generating effectively no economic return.
Set against IDEXX's 42.5% ROIC and 72% ROE, Neogen's profile is not a cyclical dip but a multi-year failure to earn a return on the capital deployed into the Food Safety acquisition. Two adjustments warrant caution: if ROIC is computed on invested capital including the approximately $1.0 billion of remaining goodwill, the near-zero reading partly reflects acquisition accounting rather than operating performance, and a goodwill-excluded measure would be the more meaningful test of whether the underlying business earns its cost of capital. Equally, equity has contracted from $3.1 billion to about $2.1 billion through impairment charges, so ROE and ROIC could rebound mechanically once reported net income turns positive without any genuine improvement in return generation; investors should monitor the numerator's quality, not just the ratio's direction.
Cycle Tightens but Asset Base Stays Stretched
Neogen's cash conversion cycle shortened from 158 days in 2025Q1 to 111 days in 2027Q1, with inventory days falling from 137 to 114, according to the company's quarterly working capital data, indicating meaningful post-merger inventory normalization rather than evidence of stronger demand.
DSO has held near 58 days throughout, while DPO lengthened from 45 to 61 days over the same window, suggesting Neogen is extracting more supplier financing than it was pre-merger, which supports cash flow but may signal negotiating pressure on smaller vendor counterparties. The more consequential efficiency metric is asset turnover, reported at 0.07x quarterly and roughly 0.27x annualized, versus an implied annualized turnover near 1.7x for IDEXX derived from its 72% ROE, 24.6% net margin and 0.67 debt-to-equity. Because goodwill and acquired intangibles inflate Neogen's asset base, a turnover measure calculated on net property, plant and equipment of about $349 million would present a materially different picture, so the depressed headline turnover should be interpreted as an artifact of the balance sheet structure as much as an operational shortfall.
Deleveraging Meets Weak Coverage Metrics
Total debt has declined roughly 15% to $774.2 million and the debt-to-equity ratio improved to 0.37 in 2027Q1, yet reported debt/EBITDA of 28.4x and negative interest coverage reflect an EBITDA base depressed by integration costs, based on the company's latest filings.
The direction of travel is favorable: debt-to-equity improved from 0.44 to 0.37 and absolute debt fell by approximately $138 million over the period, while the current ratio of 3.90 and quick ratio of 2.92 imply substantial refinancing flexibility relative to diagnostic peers such as QuidelOrtho at 1.48 debt-to-equity. However, interest coverage has been violently unstable, ranging from -35.85 to +3.66 across the last ten quarters with a -0.46 reading in 2026Q3 and -0.08 in 2027Q1, so the coverage ratio currently conveys more about the accounting distortion in EBITDA than about genuine debt service comfort. Cash of about $172 million represents only around 22% of outstanding debt, and the roughly 47-day gap between the current and quick ratios signals that liquidity is materially inventory-dependent, leaving suppliers' willingness to extend terms as a key variable; covenant headroom and refinancing maturities cannot be assessed from the data provided and warrant further investigation.
Turnaround Pricing Against Compounder Peers
At 38.58x forward earnings and 9.57x forward EV/EBITDA versus IDEXX at 38.7x P/E and 27.9x EV/EBITDA, Neogen appears priced for convergence toward peer profitability that has not yet been evidenced in reported operating margins, per the supplied peer comparison set.
The trailing P/E of -292x is analytically meaningless and confirms that current earnings cannot anchor valuation, so the meaningful anchors are the 2.92x price-to-sales and 1.21x price-to-book; for context, IDEXX's P/E and 24.6% net margin imply a price-to-sales multiple near 9.5x, suggesting Neogen trades at roughly a third of that revenue multiple but also without any demonstrated earnings stream. The forward multiple is built on a consensus EPS estimate that has risen from $0.05 to $0.08 despite no company guidance being reissued, which means the implied recovery from a -0.8% operating margin to sustainable profitability is steep and unverified. Price-to-free-cash-flow of 17.18x looks reasonable in isolation, but free cash flow margin has swung from -26.0% to +19.3% on working capital movements and cumulative free cash flow over the ten-quarter window is negative, so that multiple is likely an artifact of a favorable collection quarter rather than a durable cash generation profile.
Price-to-Book Obscures Goodwill Risk
The 1.21x price-to-book is the multiple most commonly misapplied to Neogen, because roughly 30% of the $3.3 billion asset base remains goodwill after approximately $1.1 billion of impairments, meaning book value already embeds a valuation management has twice revised downward.
For a diagnostics business, price-to-book is normally interpreted as a cheapness signal against IDEXX at 25.5x, but here the comparison breaks down: Neogen's equity base is inflated by acquisition accounting while IDEXX's is small relative to its earning power, so the low multiple reflects goodwill that may still be impaired rather than asset-backed downside protection. A further write-down of even $400 million would push book value toward roughly $1.7 billion and mechanically lift price-to-book to about 1.7x with zero change in operations, which is why the multiple's apparent discount should not be read as a floor. The more appropriate tools are EV/EBITDA computed on adjusted EBITDA stripping out amortization of acquired intangibles and inventory step-up, price-to-sales, and a return-on-invested-capital measure calculated on tangible capital, with continued goodwill impairment risk and unresolved SG&A absorption identified as the two factors most likely to invalidate a simple valuation-based thesis.