Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -111.1%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.7B | $11.6B | $9.0B | $15.4B | $16.0B | $49.8B | $57.6B | $4.1B | $6.6B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $8.7B | $11.8B | $23.5B | $17.2B | $19.8B | $54.6B | $28.7B | $13.8B | $6.7B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.68 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 1.38 | 3.55 | 0.53 | 1.34 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 4.41 | 0.91 | 0.66 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 1.43 | 2.12 | — | 0.97 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 70.02 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 19.42 | 3.87 | — | — | — | 25.34 | 29.55 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.14 | 0.36 | 0.31 | 0.40 | 1.51 | 1.77 | 1.77 | 1.36 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 34.91 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 13.6% | 13.6% | 9.9% | 5.5% | 10.4% | 18.9% | 11.5% | -15.3% | -5.2% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -16.9% | -16.9% | -33.3% | -40.7% | -31.7% | -12.4% | -28.3% | -141.6% | -193.8% | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -17.1% | -17.1% | -34.5% | -38.0% | -29.6% | -29.3% | -34.5% | -145.9% | -195.1% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -111.1% | -111.1% | -105.1% | -73.9% | -46.6% | -34.1% | -53.7% | -4199.5% | -141.6% | — | — |
| ROA | -12.5% | -12.5% | -20.1% | -19.8% | -16.3% | -15.4% | -16.2% | -68.3% | -65.9% | -81.5% | -143.3% |
| ROIC | -52.7% | -52.7% | -55.2% | -54.1% | -33.0% | -17.8% | -379.0% | -158.5% | -103.9% | — | — |
| ROCE | -31.5% | -31.5% | -41.7% | -41.2% | -30.1% | -9.5% | -20.1% | -144.5% | -100.5% | -100.1% | -249.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.07 | 2.07 | 2.50 | 1.17 | 0.86 | 0.58 | 0.35 | — | 0.47 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.02 | 1.07 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.14 | -1.06 | — | 0.02 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | -35.11 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -15.74 | -15.74 | -27.09 | -49.70 | -42.16 | -5.24 | -11.44 | -29.46 | -76.78 | -276.27 | -47207.02 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 1.22 | 1.29 | 2.18 | 3.31 | 0.52 | 1.42 | 5.13 | 1.20 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 1.13 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.23 | 0.43 | 1.25 | 5.08 | 1.20 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.35 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 1.79 | 3.03 | 0.10 | 0.96 | 4.64 | 0.81 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.47 | 0.51 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.54 | 0.26 | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 8.61 | 8.61 | 8.36 | 9.96 | 5.39 | 14.26 | 13.30 | 10.14 | 3.55 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 74.99 | 9.31 | 30.57 | 37.92 | 28.26 | 27.90 | 63.07 | 55.77 | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2.3B | $2.1B | $1.7B | $1.6B | $1.6B | $1.2B | $1.0B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.1B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NIO stock.
NIO Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -3.7x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
NIO Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -111.1%. The historical average is -80.9%.
Based on historical data, NIO Inc. is trading at a P/E of -3.7x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
NIO Inc. has 13.6% gross margin and -16.9% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent cash burn and high leverage
Gross Margin Recovery Fails to Offset Operating Losses
NIO's gross margin expanded to 18.4% in Q2 2026, a significant sequential improvement, yet the operating margin remained deeply negative at -2.1%, indicating the company's heavy SG&A and R&D structure continues to overwhelm its manufacturing profitability.
The sharp gross margin expansion from 10.0% a year ago appears to be driven by manufacturing scale and cost control, a positive signal for unit economics. However, the persistent gap between gross and operating profitability suggests the company's high fixed-cost base, including R&D and SG&A, is not yet being adequately leveraged. This dynamic places the onus entirely on continued volume growth to drive absorption of these overheads.
Leverage Rebounded by Capital Infusion, Not Earnings
Despite a recent capital infusion that improved equity, NIO's Debt-to-Equity ratio remained elevated at 2.03 in Q2 2026, and its negative interest coverage ratio of -2.74 underscores that operating losses are insufficient to service the debt load.
The balance sheet's structural shift from negative to positive equity in Q2 2026 was driven by a massive cash infusion, not retained earnings, as evidenced by the -5.1% ROE. The debt-to-equity ratio, while down from 4.68 a year ago, remains high for a loss-making company, implying continued reliance on external capital markets. The negative interest coverage is a stark indicator that the business's core operations do not generate the cash needed to cover financing costs, making the capital structure highly vulnerable to any disruption in funding.
Negative ROIC Signals Value Erosion, Not Creation
NIO's Return on Invested Capital improved to -2.3% in Q2 2026 from -14.0% a year prior, but remains firmly negative, suggesting the company is still destroying value on the capital invested in its vehicle and infrastructure platform.
The significant improvement in ROIC is encouraging and tracks with the expansion in gross margins, indicating better utilization of manufacturing assets. However, the negative figure confirms that the company's current scale and profitability are insufficient to generate returns above its cost of capital. For NIO to transition from a value-destroying to a value-compounding enterprise, both positive operating margins and sustained volume growth are prerequisites that have not yet been achieved.
Cash Conversion Cycle Deteriorates as Supplier Leverage Expands
NIO's Cash Conversion Cycle widened to -347 days in Q2 2026, a stark deterioration from -68 days a year ago, driven almost entirely by a massive extension of Days Payable Outstanding to 663 days.
The negative CCC is conventionally seen as favorable, as it indicates the company collects cash from customers before paying suppliers. However, the extreme length of DPO at 663 days, compared to 176 days a year prior, warrants scrutiny. This trend may indicate significant strain in supplier relationships or an aggressive financing strategy to preserve cash, which could pose a risk to supply chain stability if vendors demand faster payment terms.
The Misleading Comfort of Cash-Debt Symmetry
NIO's reported Q2 2026 cash position of $31.0B appears to nearly cover its $29.0B total debt, a symmetry that may obscure the true liquidity risk if a significant portion of that cash is operationally restricted or committed to ongoing capital expenditures.
This is the ratio most commonly misapplied to NIO's business model. Investors often use a simple cash-to-debt comparison to assess solvency, but for a capital-intensive manufacturer with massive infrastructure commitments, this is a poor proxy for financial flexibility. A more appropriate metric would be a forward-looking liquidity runway analysis, combining current cash with projected operating cash burn and mandatory capital spending, to understand how long NIO can fund its operations without needing additional external financing.