Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 73.6x · EV/EBITDA 9.3x · ROE 0.4%. (2013–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $81M | $27M | $16M | $23M | $69M | $338M | $94M | $13M | $39M | $60M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $44M | $-9835676 | $-94203650 | $-29280796 | $-10610468 | $328M | $95M | $17M | $37M | $49M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 73.61 | 29.17 | 0.90 | 1.29 | 2.27 | — | 34.52 | — | 5.37 | 10.10 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.43 | 8.02 | 4.47 | 0.53 | 1.32 | 2.20 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.33 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.37 | 4.23 | 1.75 | 0.36 | 0.95 | 1.91 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | 0.45 | — | 2.92 | 141.77 | 965.95 | — | — | 99.98 | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 0.44 | — | 2.89 | 125.98 | 281.49 | — | — | 37.80 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -0.03 | -0.24 | -0.13 | -0.07 | 7.78 | 4.50 | 0.66 | 1.27 | 1.79 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.32 | -2.07 | -4.48 | -1.54 | -0.27 | 28.02 | 17.22 | — | 7.76 | 5.75 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 11.92 | -1.77 | -3.88 | -1.30 | -0.26 | 32.74 | 80.77 | — | 8.68 | 6.08 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | -2.70 | — | -0.45 | 137.51 | 971.15 | — | — | 81.45 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 9.1% | 9.1% | 10.3% | 15.8% | 33.7% | 52.7% | 38.2% | 30.0% | 35.8% | 38.6% | 38.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 1.1% | 4.9% | 7.6% | 23.8% | 23.8% | 25.0% | -21.1% | 13.3% | 29.5% | 26.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.3% | 0.3% | 4.5% | 7.5% | 19.0% | -31.4% | 13.0% | -20.3% | 24.4% | 21.9% | 19.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.4% | 0.4% | 8.9% | 9.4% | 23.0% | -19.8% | 6.0% | -13.3% | 19.9% | 24.9% | 29.8% |
| ROA | 0.3% | 0.3% | 5.9% | 6.3% | 15.9% | -13.7% | 3.9% | -9.3% | 14.0% | 15.4% | 16.6% |
| ROIC | 1.3% | 1.3% | 6.9% | 6.7% | 19.9% | 10.0% | 8.0% | -9.6% | 7.9% | 24.3% | 29.1% |
| ROCE | 1.8% | 1.8% | 9.5% | 9.4% | 28.7% | 14.5% | 11.3% | -13.6% | 10.6% | 33.1% | 41.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.68 | 1.68 | 0.21 | 0.63 | 0.30 | 1.02 | 0.72 | — | 0.32 | 0.10 | 0.13 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.18 | -0.54 | -0.27 | -0.43 | -0.13 | 0.01 | 0.09 | -0.04 | -0.35 | -0.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -7.80 | -7.80 | -5.23 | -2.74 | -2.02 | -0.87 | 0.09 | — | -0.36 | -1.31 | -0.05 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | -3.15 | — | -3.37 | -4.27 | 5.20 | — | — | -18.54 | -0.38 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7.43 | -10.05 | 74.70 | 160.95 | 109.12 |
Net cash position: cash ($45M) exceeds total debt ($8M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.23 | 4.23 | 2.64 | 2.55 | 2.57 | 2.25 | 1.55 | 1.95 | 2.93 | 2.25 | 1.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.23 | 4.23 | 2.64 | 2.55 | 2.57 | 2.25 | 1.55 | 1.95 | 2.93 | 2.25 | 1.23 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.03 | 0.71 | 1.03 | 0.83 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.24 | 0.77 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.25 | 1.22 | 0.83 | 0.58 | 0.39 | 0.25 | 0.45 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.76 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.4% | 3.4% | 111.5% | 77.5% | 44.0% | — | 2.9% | — | 18.6% | 9.9% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 221.6% | — | 34.3% | 0.7% | 0.1% | — | — | 1.0% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $4M | $4M | $4M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $1M | $1M | $1M |
Rapid liquidity depletion
Based on current market data, NISN trades at a P/S ratio of 0.24, which, according to recent financial filings, suggests the market is pricing the firm as a distressed logistics intermediary rather than a high-growth fintech entity, given the lack of forward-looking earnings visibility.
The P/E ratio of 73.61 appears disconnected from the company's underlying profitability, likely reflecting the extreme volatility in net income rather than genuine growth expectations. Investors should monitor whether this valuation discount persists as the firm struggles to demonstrate a sustainable path to positive net margins.
As reported in historical financial statements, NISN's ROIC has collapsed from 13.1% in 2021Q4 to 1.7% in 2025Q2, indicating that the company is failing to generate meaningful returns on its invested capital as it pivots away from its legacy industrial manufacturing roots.
The sharp decline in ROIC suggests that the capital allocated to its current supply chain finance model is not yielding the expected efficiencies. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the firm's asset base is being deployed effectively or if it is simply being eroded by persistent operational losses.
According to recent quarterly data, the company's DSO has fluctuated significantly, reaching 50 days in 2025Q2, which suggests that NISN faces ongoing challenges in managing its receivables collection cycle within its regional agricultural and commodity trade ecosystem.
The variability in asset turnover, which dropped to 0.36 in 2025Q2, implies that the company is struggling to maintain the velocity of its trade facilitation services. This inefficiency appears to be a structural drag on the business, limiting its ability to scale without consuming excessive working capital.
Based on reported figures, the current ratio has remained relatively stable at 2.69 in 2025Q2, yet this metric masks the rapid depletion of cash reserves, which have fallen significantly, leaving the company with a diminished safety net against potential credit defaults in its SME portfolio.
While the current ratio might appear adequate on the surface, the lack of cash flow generation suggests that the company's liquidity is increasingly tied up in illiquid receivables. Investors should monitor the firm's ability to maintain operations without further dilutive financing or asset liquidation.
The most commonly misapplied metric for NISN is the P/E ratio, which, as indicated by the company's 0.27% net margin, obscures the fact that the firm operates more like a low-margin commodity broker than a scalable, high-margin technology platform.
Analysts should instead focus on EV/Sales or gross margin trends to better understand the company's true earning power. Relying on P/E multiples in this context is misleading, as it fails to account for the high variable costs and the transactional nature of the firm's revenue base.
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NISN stock.
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd's current P/E ratio is 73.6x. The historical average is 11.9x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd's current EV/EBITDA is 9.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.7x.
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd's return on equity (ROE) is 0.4%. The historical average is 12.6%.
Based on historical data, Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd is trading at a P/E of 73.6x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd has 9.1% gross margin and 1.1% operating margin.
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.7x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.