Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.5x · EV/EBITDA 45.1x · ROE N/A. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.7B | $504M | $216M | $253M | $500M | $1.3B | $1.4B | $1.8B | $1.7B | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $3.3B | $2.1B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.9B | $2.7B | $2.7B | $2.6B | $2.2B | $2.0B | $1.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12.11 | 186.50 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.32 | 0.40 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.23 | 0.73 | 0.93 | 1.52 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.75 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | 0.44 | 0.80 | 1.67 | 1.99 | 2.32 | 5.30 | 6.98 | 7.94 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | 37.93 | — | — | — | 27.74 | 19.12 | 12.08 |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | 3.32 | 18.58 | 26.37 | — | 8.65 | 8.49 | 6.84 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.68 | 1.23 | 1.16 | 0.88 | 1.48 | 1.78 | 2.16 | 1.28 | 1.26 | 1.16 |
| EV / EBITDA | 45.10 | 29.10 | 14.30 | 9.76 | 29.80 | 10.73 | 17.76 | 12.28 | 6.96 | 7.43 | 8.20 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | 807.63 | — | 27.16 | 43.27 | 30.52 | 16.28 | 19.39 | 21.94 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | 142.32 | — | — | — | 36.73 | 25.79 | 18.57 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 13.0% | 13.4% | 15.3% | 15.8% | 19.4% | 19.0% | 22.8% | 25.2% | 24.0% | 19.3% |
| Operating Margin | -3.8% | -3.8% | -0.1% | 3.0% | -4.7% | 4.8% | -0.2% | 6.3% | 11.1% | 8.9% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | -18.0% | -18.0% | -13.9% | -9.5% | -8.4% | -0.2% | -1.7% | 41.8% | 8.0% | 0.5% | -5.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | -283.8% | -22.9% | -25.2% | -0.4% | -3.5% | 91.4% | 51.9% | 4.4% | -38.2% |
| ROA | -13.8% | -13.8% | -8.7% | -4.9% | -6.2% | -0.1% | -1.0% | 25.2% | 8.5% | 0.5% | -4.7% |
| ROIC | -3.4% | -3.4% | -0.1% | 1.6% | -3.6% | 3.1% | -0.1% | 4.7% | 18.0% | 14.6% | 5.1% |
| ROCE | -3.9% | -3.9% | -0.1% | 1.9% | -4.3% | 3.6% | -0.2% | 4.9% | 16.5% | 12.6% | 4.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 2.67 | 2.34 | 1.83 | 1.94 | 1.05 | 1.92 | 2.73 | 4.79 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 23.61 | 23.61 | 13.24 | 9.01 | 23.15 | 5.79 | 9.01 | 3.92 | 1.91 | 2.15 | 3.22 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 2.45 | 2.21 | 1.73 | 1.83 | 0.98 | 1.72 | 2.44 | 4.27 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 22.19 | 22.19 | 12.52 | 8.28 | 21.86 | 5.47 | 8.51 | 3.65 | 1.70 | 1.92 | 2.86 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | 104.39 | — | — | — | 8.99 | 6.68 | 6.49 |
| Interest Coverage | -0.81 | -0.81 | -0.48 | 0.02 | -1.25 | 1.59 | 1.15 | 2.38 | 5.96 | 3.59 | 1.48 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.52 | 1.52 | 1.72 | 1.26 | 1.29 | 1.45 | 1.52 | 1.40 | 1.45 | 1.25 | 1.35 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.15 | 1.15 | 1.29 | 0.97 | 1.15 | 1.34 | 1.40 | 1.07 | 1.13 | 0.87 | 0.91 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.17 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.76 | 0.86 | 0.50 | 0.76 | 0.61 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 1.05 | 1.02 | 0.92 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.42 | 6.42 | 6.98 | 6.43 | 22.07 | 21.14 | 20.37 | 5.92 | 9.68 | 6.85 | 6.24 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 96.56 | 92.58 | 112.55 | 49.57 | 81.15 | 91.97 | 109.84 | 54.79 | 70.01 | 64.79 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.4% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8.3% | 0.5% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | 2.6% | — | — | — | 3.6% | 5.2% | 8.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 1.7% | 1.8% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 1.7% | 1.8% | 0.1% | 0.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $28M | $28M | $28M | $79M | $80M | $79M | $80M | $84M | $81M | $80M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NVRI stock.
Enviri Corporation's current P/E ratio is -2.5x. The historical average is 33.1x.
Enviri Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 45.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.8x.
Based on historical data, Enviri Corporation is trading at a P/E of -2.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Enviri Corporation has 13.0% gross margin and -3.8% operating margin.
Enviri Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 23.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and revenue decline
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Collapse Masks Underlying Operations
Q2 2026 gross margin swung to -84.5% from 19.2% in Q1, per reported figures, implying a massive non-cash impairment rather than operational deterioration, yet net margin remains deeply negative at -2.1%.
The gross margin collapse in Q2 2026 is an outlier, as the trailing four quarters averaged around 20% gross margin, suggesting a one-time write-down. However, even excluding that quarter, operating margins have been thin, ranging from -11.2% to 6.5% over the past year, indicating persistent negative operating leverage. The company's high fixed-cost structure and cyclical end-markets mean that any volume shortfall quickly erodes profitability, as seen in the -130.5% operating margin in Q2 2026. Investors should monitor whether the company can return to positive operating margins in the low-single digits, which would still be insufficient to cover interest expenses given the elevated debt load.
Return on Capital Decaying Sharply
ROIC fell to -19.5% in Q2 2026 from 0.1% in Q1, as per financial statements, reflecting a severe impairment that wiped out capital base; even prior quarters showed sub-2% ROIC, indicating chronic value destruction.
Over the last ten quarters, ROIC has been consistently below 2% except for a few quarters, and the latest quarter's -19.5% is a stark outlier. This suggests that the company is not generating returns above its cost of capital, which is likely elevated given the high leverage. The impairment in Q2 2026 reduced the capital base, but the underlying operational returns remain weak, as evidenced by the negative net margins. The company's ability to compound returns is questionable, and the market's EV/EBITDA of 45x appears to price in a recovery that is not yet visible in the return metrics.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens Amid Revenue Decline
Cash conversion cycle extended to 149 days in Q2 2026 from 56 days in Q1, based on reported data, driven by a spike in DSO to 154 days, indicating potential collection issues or revenue recognition changes.
The sharp increase in DSO from around 60 days to 154 days in Q2 2026 is a red flag, as it may indicate that the company is extending payment terms to customers to support volumes, or that there are disputes over billed amounts. DIO and DPO remained relatively stable, so the elongation is primarily from receivables. This suggests deteriorating working capital efficiency, which is particularly concerning given the negative cash flow from operations. Asset turnover also fell to 0.11x in Q2 2026 from 0.33x in Q1, reflecting the revenue decline and the asset write-downs. The company needs to tighten credit terms and improve collection to free up cash.
Leverage Spikes to Unsustainable Levels
Debt-to-equity jumped to 6.11 in Q2 2026 from 0.62 in Q1, as per SEC filings, while interest coverage turned deeply negative at -30.11, indicating that operating income is insufficient to cover interest expenses.
The dramatic increase in leverage is partly due to the equity swing from a $1.3B change, which included a large impairment and a possible equity infusion. However, the absolute debt level of $422M remains high relative to the company's market cap and cash flows. Interest coverage has been negative for most of the past year, with only a few quarters of positive coverage, suggesting that the company is reliant on external financing to service debt. The high leverage restricts financial flexibility and increases refinancing risk, especially in a high-interest-rate environment. Investors should monitor the company's ability to refinance upcoming maturities and whether it can generate sufficient EBITDA to cover interest expenses.
Liquidity Buffer Thin Despite Cash Infusion
Current ratio improved to 1.43 in Q2 2026 from 1.54 in Q1, but quick ratio of 1.19 indicates limited inventory cushion; cash rose to $253.4M, yet negative operating cash flow of -$296.9M suggests strain.
The current ratio of 1.43 is above 1, but the quick ratio of 1.19 shows that the company relies on inventory to meet short-term obligations, which may be difficult to liquidate in a downturn. The cash balance increased to $253.4M, likely from a capital raise or asset sales, but the operating cash flow of -$296.9M in Q2 2026 indicates that the company is burning cash at an alarming rate. Even if the impairment is non-cash, the underlying operations are not generating sufficient cash to cover working capital needs and capital expenditures. The company's liquidity position would be severely tested if revenue continues to decline and access to credit markets tightens.
EV/EBITDA Misleads on Cyclicality
EV/EBITDA of 45x appears expensive, but this metric is distorted by depressed EBITDA; a more appropriate measure is EV/IC or EV/Revenue, which at 1.32x reflects the cyclical downturn.
The EV/EBITDA multiple is commonly used for waste management companies, but for NVRI, EBITDA is currently depressed due to the cyclical downturn and one-time charges, making the multiple artificially high. A better approach is to normalize EBITDA over a full cycle or use EV/Revenue, which at 1.32x is more reasonable for a company with high fixed costs and cyclicality. Additionally, the company's high leverage means that equity value is highly sensitive to small changes in enterprise value, so investors should focus on the sustainability of cash flows rather than a single multiple. The market may be mispricing NVRI by applying a stable utility multiple to a highly cyclical industrial services business.