Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 11.1x · EV/EBITDA 6.1x · ROE 17.7%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $495M | $357M | $314M | $339M | $262M | $200M | $123M | $132M | $109M | $110M | $46M |
| Enterprise Value | $326M | $187M | $307M | $446M | $327M | $-84061582 | $24M | $115M | $129M | $103M | $106M |
| P/E Ratio → | 11.10 | 8.57 | 11.25 | 11.50 | 10.73 | 9.39 | 10.48 | 11.48 | 14.36 | 46.70 | 12.51 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.13 | 2.26 | 2.20 | 2.59 | 2.73 | 2.63 | 1.91 | 2.29 | 2.28 | 2.59 | 1.19 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.63 | 1.26 | 1.69 | 2.05 | 1.90 | 1.09 | 0.91 | 1.08 | 1.00 | 1.20 | 0.49 |
| P/FCF | 11.99 | 8.64 | 9.56 | 8.28 | 9.05 | 10.88 | 11.54 | 11.10 | 10.34 | 15.99 | 5.12 |
| P/OCF | 11.30 | 8.14 | 9.08 | 7.62 | 8.59 | 9.83 | 10.83 | 9.60 | 9.11 | 13.04 | 4.85 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.19 | 2.14 | 3.40 | 3.40 | -1.11 | 0.37 | 1.99 | 2.70 | 2.42 | 2.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.13 | 3.53 | 8.35 | 11.40 | 10.22 | -2.97 | 1.49 | 7.22 | 12.21 | 12.87 | 19.83 |
| EV / EBIT | 6.32 | 3.64 | 8.81 | 12.00 | 10.79 | -3.15 | 1.65 | 7.96 | 14.07 | 15.77 | 24.40 |
| EV / FCF | — | 4.54 | 9.33 | 10.88 | 11.29 | -4.58 | 2.25 | 9.66 | 12.26 | 14.96 | 11.96 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 75.5% | 75.5% | 69.8% | 71.6% | 83.7% | 91.6% | 84.3% | 87.8% | 89.0% | 89.0% | 85.1% |
| Operating Margin | 32.6% | 32.6% | 24.3% | 28.3% | 31.5% | 35.1% | 22.5% | 25.0% | 19.2% | 15.4% | 11.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 26.3% | 26.3% | 19.5% | 22.5% | 25.4% | 28.0% | 18.1% | 19.9% | 15.8% | 5.5% | 9.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.7% | 17.7% | 15.9% | 19.4% | 15.2% | 13.4% | 9.1% | 10.0% | 7.6% | 2.6% | 3.9% |
| ROA | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.4% |
| ROIC | 11.9% | 11.9% | 7.0% | 7.9% | 9.2% | 11.0% | 7.6% | 7.8% | 5.3% | 3.3% | 1.9% |
| ROCE | 17.4% | 17.4% | 15.0% | 19.6% | 16.7% | 14.7% | 10.1% | 10.4% | 6.4% | 4.4% | 2.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.77 | 1.54 | 1.09 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.36 | 0.25 | 0.95 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.65 | 0.65 | 3.89 | 6.49 | 4.72 | 0.79 | 1.39 | 0.50 | 3.65 | 2.90 | 16.44 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.60 | -0.04 | 0.64 | 0.47 | -1.55 | -0.73 | -0.14 | 0.19 | -0.08 | 0.66 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -3.20 | -3.20 | -0.20 | 2.73 | 2.03 | -10.02 | -6.15 | -1.08 | 1.91 | -0.89 | 11.34 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -4.11 | -0.22 | 2.60 | 2.24 | -15.46 | -9.29 | -1.44 | 1.92 | -1.04 | 6.84 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.67 | 1.67 | 0.98 | 1.26 | 4.94 | 6.72 | 3.07 | 2.98 | 3.29 | 2.27 | 1.11 |
Net cash position: cash ($204M) exceeds total debt ($35M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.40 | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.40 | 0.41 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.40 | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.40 | 0.41 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.5% | 2.0% | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.8% | 2.0% | 2.9% | 2.7% | 3.0% | 2.9% | 7.1% |
| Payout Ratio | 17.1% | 17.1% | 19.1% | 17.6% | 19.2% | 18.9% | 30.7% | 31.2% | 43.2% | 137.2% | 88.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.0% | 11.7% | 8.9% | 8.7% | 9.3% | 10.6% | 9.5% | 8.7% | 7.0% | 2.1% | 8.0% |
| FCF Yield | 8.3% | 11.6% | 10.5% | 12.1% | 11.1% | 9.2% | 8.7% | 9.0% | 9.7% | 6.3% | 19.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.6% | 2.0% | 1.9% | 1.7% | 1.9% | 2.2% | 3.9% | 3.1% | 3.2% | 3.0% | 7.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $13M | $11M | $11M | $11M | $10M | $9M | $9M | $8M | $8M | $4M |
CRE concentration and provisioning
According to current market data, OBT trades at a P/B of 1.63, which represents a notable premium compared to regional peers like DCOM and TRMK, suggesting that investors are pricing in the unique fee-income stability provided by the bank's integrated wealth management subsidiary, HVIA.
The elevated P/B multiple relative to peers indicates that the market views OBT as a differentiated franchise rather than a commodity lender. This valuation appears to bake in expectations for sustained ROTCE expansion, though investors should monitor whether the bank can maintain this premium if fee income volatility persists.
Based on the provided quarterly figures, OBT's ROE has fluctuated between 1.7% and 5.6% over the last ten quarters, reflecting a profitability profile that remains sensitive to the lumpy nature of non-interest income and the bank's conservative, high-capital-base operating model.
The decomposition of profitability suggests that while the bank maintains a solid asset base, the reliance on non-interest income creates significant quarterly variance in net margins. The current ROE levels appear moderate, and further improvement likely depends on the bank's ability to scale its wealth management fee base more consistently.
As reported in recent financial statements, OBT's efficiency ratio has ranged from 40.7% to 50.8% over the past ten quarters, highlighting the inherent overhead costs of maintaining a specialized, advisory-led service model while simultaneously expanding into new urban markets like the Bronx.
The fluctuation in the efficiency ratio suggests that OBT faces a trade-off between its high-touch service model and the need for operational leverage. Investors should monitor whether the recent geographic expansion leads to permanent margin compression or if the bank can successfully absorb these costs through increased revenue density.
Based on the bank's reported figures, the equity-to-assets ratio has strengthened to 0.11 as of 2026Q1, providing a robust capital buffer that exceeds many regional peers and offers the bank significant flexibility for organic growth or potential opportunistic acquisitions.
The bank's conservative capital positioning appears to be a deliberate strategy to mitigate risks associated with its CRE-heavy loan portfolio. This fortress-like balance sheet suggests that OBT is well-positioned to navigate potential economic downturns without the immediate need for dilutive capital raises.
The most commonly misapplied metric for OBT is the P/E ratio, which frequently obscures the bank's true earnings power due to the volatility of provision for credit losses and the lumpy nature of trust-based fee income recognized in the income statement.
Investors should prioritize P/TBV over P/E, as the latter is heavily distorted by non-cash provisioning adjustments and the timing of wealth management fees. Relying on P/E may lead to an inaccurate assessment of the bank's core profitability, as it fails to account for the underlying stability of the AUM-based revenue stream.
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying OBT stock.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 11.1x. The historical average is 12.1x. This places it at the 57th percentile of its historical range.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 6.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.1x.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 17.7%. The historical average is 9.6%.
Based on historical data, Orange County Bancorp, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 11.1x. This is at the 57th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.54% with a payout ratio of 17.1%.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc. has 75.5% gross margin and 32.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.7x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.