Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 4.3x · EV/EBITDA 0.4x · ROE 14.8%. (2003–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $71M | $52M | $47M | $30M | $24M | $15M | $10M | $5M | $4M | $5M | $4M |
| Enterprise Value | $9M | $-9637927 | $56M | $80M | $-25308676 | $-5871466 | $-18749433 | $13M | $26M | $19M | $15M |
| P/E Ratio → | 4.26 | 3.12 | 3.58 | 4.80 | 6.01 | 2.44 | — | — | 5.66 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 1.07 | 1.30 | 1.41 | 0.98 | 1.02 | 1.09 | 0.85 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.58 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.55 | 0.73 | 0.84 | 2.04 | 1.28 |
| P/FCF | 4.20 | 3.08 | 3.21 | 4.87 | 2.43 | 4.53 | — | — | — | 10.91 | 8.75 |
| P/OCF | 3.99 | 2.92 | 3.01 | 4.40 | 2.35 | 4.07 | — | — | 186.66 | 9.11 | 7.14 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -0.14 | 0.87 | 2.04 | -1.11 | -0.50 | -2.68 | 2.42 | 6.00 | 4.02 | 3.24 |
| EV / EBITDA | 0.41 | -0.42 | 3.08 | 8.85 | -4.25 | -1.74 | — | — | 27.49 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 0.42 | -0.43 | 3.18 | 9.44 | -4.69 | -1.91 | — | — | 32.98 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | -0.57 | 3.84 | 12.85 | -2.52 | -1.74 | — | — | — | 40.30 | 33.22 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 66.5% | 66.5% | 57.7% | 58.9% | 67.1% | 81.7% | 60.9% | 63.3% | 111.6% | 74.9% | 76.6% |
| Operating Margin | 31.2% | 31.2% | 27.4% | 21.6% | 23.6% | 26.0% | -11.2% | -21.5% | 18.2% | -12.4% | -8.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 23.4% | 23.4% | 20.4% | 16.0% | 17.6% | 53.3% | -11.2% | -20.5% | 18.2% | -12.4% | -8.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.8% | 14.8% | 15.2% | 9.5% | 8.0% | 22.3% | -6.2% | -17.6% | 20.3% | -20.9% | -13.1% |
| ROA | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.5% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 2.1% | -0.4% | -1.0% | 0.8% | -0.5% | -0.3% |
| ROIC | 8.7% | 8.7% | 6.6% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 3.8% | -1.7% | -2.9% | 1.9% | -1.5% | -1.0% |
| ROCE | 18.4% | 18.4% | 17.6% | 10.8% | 9.9% | 9.8% | -4.6% | -9.1% | 6.9% | -5.8% | -4.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.43 | 0.43 | 1.00 | 1.80 | 0.35 | 0.98 | 1.46 | 2.31 | 5.61 | 10.08 | 9.30 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.29 | 2.29 | 5.64 | 14.00 | 3.72 | 11.21 | — | — | 31.16 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.51 | 0.09 | 0.71 | -0.79 | -0.55 | -1.61 | 1.07 | 4.10 | 5.50 | 3.58 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -2.68 | -2.68 | 0.50 | 5.50 | -8.33 | -6.29 | — | — | 22.80 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -3.65 | 0.63 | 7.98 | -4.95 | -6.27 | — | — | — | 29.39 | 24.48 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.02 | 1.02 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 1.33 | 3.12 | -0.45 | -0.56 | 0.64 | -0.49 | -0.37 |
Net cash position: cash ($115M) exceeds total debt ($53M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.27 | 0.35 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.27 | 0.35 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 23.4% | 32.0% | 27.9% | 20.8% | 16.6% | 41.0% | — | — | 17.7% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 23.8% | 32.5% | 31.1% | 20.5% | 41.2% | 22.1% | — | — | — | 9.2% | 11.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $12M | $10M | $7M | $6M | $4M | $3M | $2M | $1M | $1M | $1M |
Broward County real estate concentration
Based on recent market data, OPHC trades at a P/B of 0.58, which appears to reflect a significant complexity discount compared to regional peers, suggesting that investors are pricing the bank as a distressed asset rather than a specialized lender with a localized competitive advantage in Broward County.
The current valuation multiple implies that the market is heavily discounting the bank's tangible book value, likely due to concerns regarding geographic concentration and the inherent risks of construction lending. This valuation suggests that the market may be overlooking the potential for franchise value if the bank successfully scales its niche lending model without incurring outsized credit losses.
As reported in financial statements, OPHC's ROE has remained in a narrow range between 3.1% and 4.1% over the last ten quarters, indicating that while the bank is consistently profitable, its return on equity is currently constrained by a conservative capital structure and limited non-interest income contribution.
The DuPont decomposition suggests that the bank's profitability is primarily driven by its net interest margin, with minimal leverage utilized to amplify returns. Investors should monitor whether management can improve asset utilization or diversify revenue streams to drive ROE higher, as the current levels may struggle to exceed the cost of equity in a volatile rate environment.
According to quarterly filings, OPHC has maintained a stable NIM of approximately 1.0% while keeping its efficiency ratio between 26.2% and 37.7%, demonstrating an ability to manage funding costs effectively despite the high fixed-cost requirements of maintaining a physical presence in the competitive South Florida market.
The bank's ability to maintain these margins suggests that its bespoke lending model provides sufficient pricing power to offset the costs of deposit gathering. However, the efficiency ratio's volatility warrants further investigation into whether future scale can be achieved without a proportional increase in non-interest expenses, which could otherwise compress the bank's operating margins.
Based on reported figures, OPHC maintains an equity-to-assets ratio consistently between 0.09 and 0.11, which appears to provide a stable capital buffer that supports the bank's current risk profile while allowing for continued, albeit disciplined, balance sheet expansion within its core Broward County real estate lending niche.
This capital position suggests that the bank is prioritizing balance sheet stability over aggressive, leveraged growth, which is appropriate given the inherent risks of its concentrated loan portfolio. The lack of dividend payments further indicates that management is retaining all earnings to bolster this capital base, which may be a prudent strategy given the current economic uncertainty.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to OPHC, as it obscures the impact of volatile loan loss provisions and the bank's reliance on tangible book value as the primary anchor for valuation in a capital-intensive, interest-rate-sensitive business model that lacks consistent earnings growth.
Investors should prioritize P/TBV over P/E, as the latter is highly sensitive to the timing of credit provisions which can artificially inflate or deflate earnings in any given quarter. Relying on P/E ignores the underlying asset quality and the bank's ability to generate value through its loan portfolio, which is better captured by analyzing the trend in tangible book value per share.
Includes 30+ ratios · 23 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying OPHC stock.
OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 4.3x. The historical average is 11.7x. This places it at the 23th percentile of its historical range.
OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 0.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 23.4x.
OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 14.8%. The historical average is -15.5%.
Based on historical data, OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 4.3x. This is at the 23th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. has 66.5% gross margin and 31.2% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.3x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.