Revenue swung from a $599.0K decline in 2024Q2 to $164.1 million in 2026Q3 (111.7% year-over-year), yet NOI margins oscillating between 29.1% and 100.0% and diluted EPS ranging from $0.62 to -$0.90 suggest profitability is dominated by mark-to-market movements rather than stable spread income.
Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (ORC) annual income statement — 16-year revenue, gross profit & net income history
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 | Dec'19 | Dec'18 | Dec'17 | Dec'16 | Dec'15 | Dec'14 | Dec'13 | Dec'12 | Dec'11 | Dec'10 |
|---|
| Revenue | 618.37M | 179.51M | 54.41M | -20.7M | -241M | -49.89M | 12.67M | 34.65M | 124.29M | 138.17M | 90.21M | 67.4M | 34.59M | 8M | 2.35M | 2.04M | 69.34K |
| Revenue Growth % | 671.16% | 229.95% | 362.89% | 91.41% | -383.03% | -493.73% | -63.43% | -72.12% | -10.05% | 53.17% | 33.85% | 94.83% | 332.4% | 240.4% | 15.09% | 2845.28% | - |
| Property Operating Expenses | 202.38M | 3.99M | 0 | 0 | 2.87M | 0 | 2.57M | 2.38M | 7.83M | 6.98M | 4.84M | 4.22M | 2.19M | 832.09K | 448.88K | 344.7K | 5.5K |
| Net Operating Income (NOI) | 415.99M | 175.52M | 54.41M | -20.7M | -243.88M | -49.89M | 10.1M | 32.27M | 116.46M | 131.19M | 85.37M | 63.18M | 32.4M | 7.17M | 1.9M | 1.7M | 63.84K |
| NOI Margin % | 67.27% | 97.78% | 100% | 100% | 101.19% | 100% | 79.71% | 93.14% | 93.7% | 94.95% | 94.63% | 93.74% | 93.66% | 89.6% | 80.9% | 83.12% | 92.07% |
| Operating Expenses | 85.89M | 16.49M | 54.41M | -20.7M | 14.58M | -49.89M | 7.97M | 8.01M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| G&A Expenses | 13.3M | 16.49M | 2.62M | 3.44M | 14.58M | 2.88M | 7.97M | 8.01M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EBITDA | 397.41M | 464.76M | 273.94M | 162.69M | -258.45M | -57.67M | 2.13M | 24.27M | 25.97M | 2.01M | 1.98M | 1.07M | 24.52M | -698.01K | 534.34K | -90.21K | 25.15K |
| EBITDA Margin % | 64.27% | 258.91% | 503.52% | -786.14% | 107.24% | 115.59% | 16.79% | 70.03% | 20.9% | 1.45% | 2.19% | 1.59% | 70.87% | -8.72% | 22.73% | -4.42% | 36.27% |
| Depreciation & Amortization | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| D&A / Revenue % | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Operating Income | 330.1M | 159.03M | 0 | 0 | -258.45M | 0 | 2.13M | 24.27M | 25.97M | 2.01M | 1.98M | 1.07M | 24.52M | -698.01K | 534.34K | -90.21K | 25.15K |
| Operating Margin % | 53.38% | 88.59% | 0% | 0% | 107.24% | 0% | 16.79% | 70.03% | 20.9% | 1.45% | 2.19% | 1.59% | 70.87% | -8.72% | 22.73% | -4.42% | 36.27% |
| Interest Expense | 4M | 305.73M | 236.28M | 201.92M | 61.71M | 7.09M | 25.06M | 83.67M | 70.36M | 41.67M | 15.6M | 7.27M | 3.03M | 1.13M | 277K | 96.22K | 5.19K |
| Interest Coverage | - | 1.52x | 1.16x | 0.81x | -4.19x | -8.13x | 0.08x | 0.29x | 0.37x | 0.05x | 0.13x | 0.15x | 8.09x | -0.62x | 1.93x | -0.94x | 4.85x |
| Non-Operating Income | -67.31M | -305.73M | -273.94M | -162.69M | -258.45M | 57.67M | 2.13M | 24.27M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pretax Income | -6.28M | 159.03M | 37.66M | -39.23M | -258.45M | -64.76M | 2.13M | 24.27M | -44.39M | 2.01M | 1.98M | 1.07M | 24.52M | -698K | 534.34K | -1.19M | 0 |
| Pretax Margin % | -1.01% | 88.59% | 69.22% | 189.54% | 107.24% | 129.8% | 16.79% | 70.03% | -35.71% | 1.45% | 2.19% | 1.59% | 70.87% | -8.72% | 22.73% | -58.28% | 0% |
| Income Tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.15K |
| Effective Tax Rate % | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | - |
| Net Income | -6.28M | 159.03M | 37.66M | -39.23M | -258.45M | -64.76M | 2.13M | 24.27M | -44.39M | 2.01M | 1.98M | 1.07M | 24.52M | -698K | 534K | -1.19M | -30.15K |
| Net Margin % | -1.01% | 88.59% | 69.22% | 189.54% | 107.24% | 129.8% | 16.79% | 70.03% | -35.71% | 1.45% | 2.19% | 1.59% | 70.87% | -8.72% | 22.72% | -58.28% | -43.49% |
| Net Income Growth % | -110.26% | 322.26% | 196.01% | 84.82% | -299.09% | -3143.23% | -91.23% | 154.67% | -2311.61% | 1.41% | 84.78% | -95.63% | 3612.75% | -230.71% | 144.87% | -3847.12% | - |
| Funds From Operations (FFO) | 0 | 159.03M | 37.66M | -39.23M | -258.45M | -64.76M | 2.13M | 24.27M | -44.39M | 2.01M | 1.98M | 1.07M | 24.52M | -698K | 534K | -1.19M | -30.15K |
| FFO Margin % | 0% | 88.59% | 69.22% | 189.54% | 107.24% | 129.8% | 16.79% | 70.03% | -35.71% | 1.45% | 2.19% | 1.59% | 70.87% | -8.72% | 22.72% | -58.28% | -43.49% |
| FFO Growth % | 0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| FFO per Share | 0.00 | 1.24 | 0.58 | -0.88 | -6.90 | -2.67 | 0.16 | 2.15 | -4.25 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 0.26 | 12.40 | -1.15 | 0.80 | -1.78 | -0.05 |
| FFO Payout Ratio % | - | 112.47% | 245.61% | -205.87% | -36.17% | -140.49% | 2520.91% | 219.69% | -133.62% | 3383.36% | 1858.11% | 3617.93% | 92.35% | -667.91% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| EPS (Diluted) | -0.03 | 1.24 | 0.58 | -0.88 | -6.90 | -2.67 | 0.16 | 2.15 | -4.25 | 0.25 | 0.40 | 0.25 | 12.40 | -1.15 | 0.80 | -1.78 | -0.05 |
| EPS Growth % | -89.79% | 113.79% | 165.91% | 87.25% | -158.43% | -1768.75% | -92.56% | 150.57% | -1800.72% | -37.5% | 60% | -97.98% | 1178.26% | -243.84% | 144.9% | -3848.56% | - |
| EPS (Basic) | - | 1.24 | 0.58 | -0.88 | -6.90 | -2.67 | 0.16 | 2.15 | -4.25 | 0.25 | 0.40 | 0.25 | 12.40 | -1.15 | 0.80 | -1.78 | -0.05 |
| Diluted Shares Outstanding | 198.45M | 128.3M | 65.45M | 44.65M | 37.46M | 24.23M | 13.44M | 11.27M | 10.44M | 8.21M | 4.82M | 4.05M | 1.98M | 606.96K | 668.33K | 668.33K | 668.33K |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ORC stock.
For fiscal year 2025, Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (ORC) reported total revenue of $179.5M. This represents a 258783.8% increase compared to $0.1M in 2010.
Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (ORC) is profitable, generating $159.0M in net income for the fiscal year ending 2025 with a net profit margin of 88.6%.
Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (ORC) reported an operating income of $159.0M, resulting in an operating profit margin of 88.6%. This margin reflects the operational efficiency of the business before interest and taxes.
Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (ORC) generated $175.5M in gross profit for the year, representing a gross profit margin of 97.8%. This demonstrates the company's core pricing power and production efficiency.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage amid rate volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Revenue Recovery Masked by Volatility
Revenue swung from a $0.6 million decline in 2024Q2 to $164.1 million in 2026Q3, an 111.7% year-over-year increase, per the reported quarterly income statements, but the path includes negative-revenue quarters that suggest mark-to-market swings rather than steady income growth.
The revenue trajectory appears to reflect recovery from the 2024-2025 trough rather than compounding organic growth, since the 111.7% jump in 2026Q3 follows two quarters of single-digit growth at 6.4% and 6.7%. The negative-revenue reading of -$28.6 million in 2025Q2 implies the top line embeds unrealized valuation movements, so quarter-over-quarter comparisons may say more about rate moves than portfolio scale. Investors should monitor whether the recent acceleration persists once the base effects of the 2025 weakness roll off.
NOI Margin Oscillation Distorts Read
Based on Orchid Island's reported figures, the NOI margin has ranged from 29.1% in 2025Q4 and 36.5% in 2026Q2 to 100.0% in five other quarters, a discontinuity that makes trend-based profitability assessment largely unreliable across this ten-quarter window.
The 100.0% NOI margin readings in five quarters versus 29.1% and 36.5% in others suggest the NOI line is not consistently presented net of the same cost base, so cross-period margin comparison warrants caution. If the low-margin quarters better capture full financing and operating cost absorption, underlying portfolio profitability may be materially thinner than the headline 100% readings imply. The divergence in 2026Q2, where margin fell to 36.5% even as revenue reached $164.2 million, is a pattern investors should monitor closely.
Dividend Yield Climb Amid EPS Swings
According to the quarterly data, ORC's dividend yield has drifted from 4.2% in 2024Q3 to 5.6% in 2026Q3 while diluted EPS swung between $0.62 and -$0.90, with FFO and AFFO figures listed as unavailable for every period shown.
Because FFO and AFFO are unavailable across all ten periods, payout coverage cannot be assessed on the REIT-appropriate earnings measure, and EPS swings driven by fair value marks may not reflect distributable cash. The rise in dividend yield to 5.6% may indicate a declining share price rather than an increased distribution, which would suggest the market is demanding greater compensation for the volatility evident in reported results. Coverage relative to the distribution therefore warrants further investigation using supplemental disclosures.
Record Revenue, Deepest Quarterly Loss
As reported in Orchid Island's income statement, 2026Q3 posted the series' highest revenue of $164.1 million alongside a $178.9 million net loss and -$0.90 diluted EPS, the widest gap between top line and bottom line in the ten quarters examined.
The 2026Q3 divergence suggests the loss originated below the revenue line, plausibly in financing costs or fair value declines that the revenue line itself does not capture, rather than in portfolio operating costs. Because NOI equaled revenue at 100.0% in that same quarter, the reported loss cannot be attributed to operating expense absorption and instead appears tied to leverage or valuation effects. If this configuration repeats, headline EPS may prove an unreliable guide to the portfolio's earning power.
Fair Value Noise Dominates Reported Earnings
Financial statements show ORC posted a $20.0 million net loss in 2026Q1 on $157.9 million of revenue and a 97.2% NOI margin, suggesting reported profitability is dominated by non-operating fair value movements rather than core spread income earned.
The combination of a 97.2% NOI margin and a $20.0 million net loss in 2026Q1 implies most earnings variability sits outside the operating lines, consistent with an mREIT structure where hedge results and unrealized gains offset portfolio yield. Analysts should test whether successive EPS figures, ranging from $0.62 to -$0.90 within four quarters, track spread income or mark-to-market noise, since only the former would lend credibility to the 5.6% yield. The counter-case is that reported earnings quality is weaker than the top-line recovery suggests, which would challenge any valuation anchored on GAAP EPS.