Revenue jumped 66.3% year-over-year to $17.7B in Q2 2026, but gross margin fell to 4.6% from 6.1%, and net income volatility (swing from $20M in Q1 to $389M in Q2) suggests non-operating items may be inflating EPS of $1.97.
Plains GP Holdings LP (PAGP) annual income statement — 15-year revenue, gross profit & net income history
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 | Dec'19 | Dec'18 | Dec'17 | Dec'16 | Dec'15 | Dec'14 | Dec'13 | Dec'12 | Dec'11 |
|---|
| Sales/Revenue | 52.31B | 44.26B | 50.07B | 48.71B | 57.34B | 42.08B | 23.29B | 33.67B | 34.05B | 26.22B | 20.18B | 23.15B | 43.46B | 42.25B | 37.8B | 34.27B |
| Revenue Growth % | 9.43% | -11.61% | 2.79% | -15.05% | 36.28% | 80.67% | -30.83% | -1.13% | 29.87% | 29.93% | -12.83% | -46.73% | 2.88% | 11.78% | 10.28% | - |
| Cost of Goods Sold | 49.65B | 41.59B | 46.59B | 45.58B | 54.14B | 39.28B | 21.09B | 30.06B | 30.31B | 23.61B | 17.73B | 20.16B | 39.89B | 38.84B | 34.85B | 31.81B |
| COGS % of Revenue | - | 93.96% | 93.04% | 93.57% | 94.42% | 93.35% | 90.54% | 89.27% | 89.01% | 90.05% | 87.84% | 87.07% | 91.79% | 91.94% | 92.21% | 92.82% |
| Gross Profit | 2.66B | 2.67B | 3.49B | 3.13B | 3.2B | 2.8B | 2.2B | 3.61B | 3.74B | 2.61B | 2.45B | 2.99B | 3.57B | 3.41B | 2.95B | 2.46B |
| Gross Margin % | 5.09% | 6.04% | 6.96% | 6.43% | 5.58% | 6.65% | 9.46% | 10.73% | 10.99% | 9.95% | 12.16% | 12.93% | 8.21% | 8.06% | 7.79% | 7.18% |
| Gross Profit Growth % | - | -23.29% | 11.41% | -2.13% | 14.34% | 26.96% | -39.03% | -3.42% | 43.33% | 6.36% | -18.01% | -16.16% | 4.81% | 15.61% | 19.71% | - |
| Operating Expenses | 1.08B | 1.25B | 2.31B | 1.63B | 1.91B | 1.96B | 4.59B | 1.63B | 1.58B | 1.46B | 1.46B | 1.74B | 1.79B | 1.68B | 1.52B | 1.16B |
| OpEx % of Revenue | - | 2.82% | 4.62% | 3.34% | 3.34% | 4.65% | 19.69% | 4.85% | 4.65% | 5.58% | 7.25% | 7.49% | 4.11% | 3.98% | 4.03% | 3.4% |
| Selling, General & Admin | 369M | 342M | 387M | 356M | 330M | 298M | 276M | 302M | 320M | 280M | 282M | 281M | 331M | 360M | 342M | 294M |
| SG&A % of Revenue | - | 0.77% | 0.77% | 0.73% | 0.58% | 0.71% | 1.19% | 0.9% | 0.94% | 1.07% | 1.4% | 1.21% | 0.76% | 0.85% | 0.9% | 0.86% |
| Research & Development | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| R&D % of Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other Operating Expenses | 4M | 899M | 1.93B | 1.27B | 1.58B | 1.66B | 4.31B | 1.33B | -7M | -31M | 33M | -7M | -2M | 1M | 6M | -19M |
| Operating Income | 1.58B | 1.43B | 1.17B | 1.5B | 1.28B | 842M | -2.38B | 1.98B | 2.27B | 1.15B | 990M | 1.26B | 1.78B | 1.72B | 1.42B | 1.3B |
| Operating Margin % | 3.03% | 3.23% | 2.34% | 3.08% | 2.24% | 2% | -10.23% | 5.88% | 6.67% | 4.37% | 4.91% | 5.43% | 4.1% | 4.08% | 3.77% | 3.78% |
| Operating Income Growth % | - | 21.84% | -21.92% | 16.9% | 52.49% | 135.33% | -220.35% | -12.85% | 98.08% | 15.86% | -21.3% | -29.44% | 3.42% | 21.07% | 9.79% | - |
| EBITDA | 2.53B | 2.38B | 2.2B | 2.55B | 2.25B | 1.62B | -1.73B | 2.58B | 2.79B | 1.66B | 1.45B | 1.69B | 2.18B | 2.1B | 1.91B | 1.55B |
| EBITDA Margin % | 4.84% | 5.38% | 4.39% | 5.24% | 3.93% | 3.85% | -7.42% | 7.67% | 8.2% | 6.34% | 7.2% | 7.3% | 5.01% | 4.98% | 5.05% | 4.51% |
| EBITDA Growth % | 15.9% | 8.33% | -13.87% | 13.32% | 39.1% | 193.75% | -166.83% | -7.48% | 67.95% | 14.37% | -14.02% | -22.32% | 3.57% | 10.23% | 23.27% | - |
| D&A (Non-Cash Add-back) | 946M | 953M | 1.03B | 1.05B | 968M | 777M | 656M | 604M | 521M | 516M | 464M | 433M | 394M | 378M | 483M | 250M |
| EBIT | 1.71B | 1.86B | 1.66B | 2B | 1.81B | 1.14B | -2.17B | 2.66B | 2.84B | 1.39B | 1.2B | 1.43B | 1.9B | 1.8B | 1.47B | 1.29B |
| Net Interest Income | -217M | -467M | -360M | -386M | -405M | -425M | -436M | -425M | -431M | -510M | -480M | -443M | -357M | -319M | -295M | -259M |
| Interest Income | 0 | 0 | 22M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Interest Expense | 217M | 467M | 382M | 386M | 405M | 425M | 436M | 425M | 431M | 510M | 480M | 443M | 357M | 319M | 295M | 259M |
| Other Income/Expense | -96M | -33M | 102M | 113M | 125M | -130M | -224M | 258M | 137M | -251M | -252M | -267M | -251M | -274M | -251M | -265M |
| Pretax Income | 1.49B | 1.4B | 1.27B | 1.61B | 1.41B | 712M | -2.61B | 2.24B | 2.41B | 896M | 738M | 991M | 1.54B | 1.48B | 1.17B | 1.03B |
| Pretax Margin % | 2.84% | 3.15% | 2.54% | 3.31% | 2.46% | 1.69% | -11.19% | 6.65% | 7.07% | 3.42% | 3.66% | 4.28% | 3.54% | 3.5% | 3.1% | 3.01% |
| Income Tax | 263M | 92M | 204M | 189M | 246M | 112M | -167M | 176M | 302M | 937M | 78M | 182M | 212M | 106M | 55M | 45M |
| Effective Tax Rate % | 17.67% | 6.59% | 16.01% | 11.71% | 17.46% | 15.73% | 6.41% | 7.86% | 12.54% | 104.58% | 10.57% | 18.37% | 13.77% | 7.16% | 4.69% | 4.36% |
| Net Income | 554M | 260M | 103M | 198M | 168M | 60M | -568M | 331M | 334M | -731M | 94M | 118M | 70M | 15M | 40M | 2M |
| Net Margin % | 1.06% | 0.59% | 0.21% | 0.41% | 0.29% | 0.14% | -2.44% | 0.98% | 0.98% | -2.79% | 0.47% | 0.51% | 0.16% | 0.04% | 0.11% | 0.01% |
| Net Income Growth % | 307.35% | 152.43% | -47.98% | 17.86% | 180% | 110.56% | -271.6% | -0.9% | 145.69% | -877.66% | -20.34% | 68.57% | 366.67% | -62.5% | 1900% | - |
| Net Income (Continuing) | 1.23B | 1.3B | 1.07B | 1.43B | 1.16B | 600M | -2.44B | 2.06B | 2.11B | -41M | 660M | 809M | 1.33B | 1.37B | 1.12B | 987M |
| Discontinued Operations | 2M | 383M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minority Interest | 13.73B | 12.87B | 12.96B | 13.42B | 13.11B | 12.64B | 9.73B | 12.33B | 11.47B | 10.66B | 8.97B | 7.47B | 7.72B | 7.24B | 6.97B | 5.79B |
| EPS (Diluted) | 2.80 | 1.31 | 0.52 | 1.02 | 0.87 | 0.31 | -2.31 | 1.95 | 2.11 | -5.04 | 0.94 | 1.41 | 5.65 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| EPS Growth % | 309.24% | 151.92% | -49.02% | 17.24% | 180.65% | 113.42% | -218.46% | -7.58% | 141.87% | -636.17% | -33.33% | -75.04% | 1992.59% | 332.69% | 50% | - |
| EPS (Basic) | - | 1.31 | 0.52 | 1.02 | 0.87 | 0.31 | -3.05 | 1.97 | 2.12 | -5.04 | 0.94 | 1.41 | 5.65 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| Diluted Shares Outstanding | 198M | 198M | 197M | 195M | 194M | 194M | 246M | 170M | 159M | 145M | 99M | 83M | 54M | 49.57M | 48.07M | 48.07M |
| Basic Shares Outstanding | 198M | 198M | 197M | 195M | 194M | 194M | 186M | 168M | 158M | 145M | 99M | 83M | 54M | 49.57M | 48.07M | 48.07M |
| Dividend Payout Ratio | - | 115.77% | 243.69% | 105.56% | 96.43% | 233.33% | - | 69.79% | 56.59% | - | 248.94% | 165.25% | 130% | 18873.33% | 7.5% | 100% |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PAGP stock.
For fiscal year 2025, Plains GP Holdings LP (PAGP) reported total revenue of $44.26B. This represents a 29.1% increase compared to $34.27B in 2011.
Plains GP Holdings LP (PAGP) is profitable, generating $260.0M in net income for the fiscal year ending 2025 with a net profit margin of 0.6%.
Plains GP Holdings LP (PAGP) reported an operating income of $1.43B, resulting in an operating profit margin of 3.2%. This margin reflects the operational efficiency of the business before interest and taxes.
Plains GP Holdings LP (PAGP) generated $2.67B in gross profit for the year, representing a gross profit margin of 6.0%. This demonstrates the company's core pricing power and production efficiency.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Permian maturation and tariff pressure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Revenue Surge Masks Underlying Volatility
Revenue jumped 66.3% year-over-year to $17.7B in Q2 2026, per the latest income statement, but this spike appears driven by commodity price flows rather than durable volume growth, as prior quarters showed declines.
The 66.3% revenue growth in Q2 2026 is the most striking figure in the dataset, yet it follows a pattern of erratic swings—Q1 2026 grew only 3.8%, while 2025 quarters contracted between 9% and 17%. This suggests the top line is heavily influenced by the pass-through nature of the supply and logistics business, where revenue is grossed up by the value of crude traded. Investors should monitor whether this surge reflects higher throughput or simply wider price spreads, as the latter is less sustainable.
Gross Margin Compression Persists
Gross margin fell to 4.6% in Q2 2026 from 6.1% a year earlier, based on reported figures, indicating continued pressure on fee-based spreads and a competitive Permian environment.
The gross margin trajectory shows a clear deterioration from the 8.2% peak in Q1 2025 to the current 4.6%, despite the revenue surge. This implies that the incremental revenue in Q2 2026 was generated at lower incremental margins, likely due to narrower regional price differentials and increased competition for uncommitted barrels. The structural gross margin of ~6% is well below peers like EPD (13.6%) and ET (21.8%), reflecting the heavy marketing component, but the recent decline suggests the fee-based mix may be shrinking.
Operating Leverage Fails to Materialize
Operating income rose only 67% in Q2 2026 despite a 66% revenue surge, per the income statement, but SG&A grew 32% year-over-year, indicating limited operating leverage in the current cost structure.
While Q2 2026 operating income of $397M is the highest in the dataset, the operating margin of 2.2% is below the 4.4% achieved in Q1 2025, showing that revenue growth is not translating into proportional profit expansion. SG&A increased to $111M from $84M in Q2 2025, a 32% jump, which may reflect higher administrative costs or incentive compensation tied to the revenue spike. This suggests the company's high fixed-cost base is not being leveraged effectively, as variable costs and competitive pressures absorb the incremental revenue.
Net Income Volatility Raises Quality Concerns
Net income swung from $20M in Q1 2026 to $389M in Q2 2026, per the income statement, yet EPS of $1.97 far exceeds the $0.41 consensus, suggesting non-operating items may be inflating reported earnings.
The Q2 2026 net margin of 2.2% is consistent with operating margin, but the massive sequential jump from $20M to $389M net income—a 19x increase—warrants scrutiny. Given the absence of stock-based compensation and the presence of derivative mark-to-market adjustments typical in this sector, the reported net income may include non-cash gains that are not indicative of core cash generation. Investors should focus on adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow to assess the sustainability of earnings, as the reported figures appear to be heavily influenced by one-off items.
Purchases and Related Costs Dominate
COGS of $16.9B in Q2 2026 represents 95.4% of revenue, per the income statement, underscoring the pass-through nature of the marketing business and leaving little room for margin expansion.
The cost structure is dominated by 'Purchases and Related Costs,' which are the direct costs of buying and selling crude oil and NGLs. This line item is the primary driver of the low gross margin, as it scales almost one-for-one with revenue. The $111M SG&A is relatively small, indicating a lean overhead structure, but the lack of R&D spending is typical for midstream. The key cost risk is not SG&A inflation but the volatility in purchase costs, which can compress margins when price spreads narrow, as seen in the declining gross margin trend.
Q1 2025 Marks Margin Peak
Q1 2025 delivered the highest gross margin (8.2%) and operating margin (4.4%) in the dataset, per the income statement, representing a peak that has since eroded as competitive pressures intensified.
The Q1 2025 period appears to be the inflection point where margins were at their most favorable, likely benefiting from wider WTI Midland-to-Houston spreads and strong utilization of uncommitted capacity. Since then, gross margin has declined to 4.6% in Q2 2026, a 44% drop from the peak, while operating margin has halved. This suggests that the Permian takeaway capacity additions and producer capital discipline have shifted the bargaining power away from midstream operators, a trend that may persist if volume growth plateaus.
Revenue Spike Could Mask Structural Decline
The 66% revenue surge in Q2 2026 may be a temporary artifact of commodity price movements, as per the income statement, while underlying margins and volumes suggest a deteriorating competitive position.
Short-sellers would likely argue that the headline revenue growth is misleading, given that gross margin has fallen to 4.6% and operating margin to 2.2%, both below the trailing averages. The Q2 2026 EPS of $1.97 is far above the $0.41 consensus, which could indicate a one-time gain or favorable derivative settlement that is not repeatable. Furthermore, the maintained full-year Adjusted EBITDA guidance despite the EPS beat suggests management sees the quarter as an outlier, not a new trend. If Permian production growth slows and gas takeaway constraints persist, PAGP's utilization and tariff rates could face further pressure, making the current earnings quality questionable.