Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 10.5x · EV/EBITDA 9.5x · ROE 8.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $33.3B | $35.4B | $43.3B | $38.5B | $34.7B | $24.1B | $15.7B | $5.7B | $12.3B | $23.0B | $30.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $93.9B | $96.0B | $100.7B | $95.6B | $87.5B | $70.0B | $57.8B | $8.0B | $32.6B | $41.7B | $48.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 10.52 | 13.62 | 17.55 | 17.17 | 19.36 | — | — | — | — | 13.97 | 21.86 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.33 | 1.42 | 1.77 | 1.58 | 1.60 | 1.17 | 0.85 | 0.34 | 0.73 | 1.34 | 1.72 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.83 | 1.08 | 1.43 | 1.52 | 1.50 | 1.14 | 0.74 | 1.07 | 0.95 | 1.18 | 1.67 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 68.45 | — |
| P/OCF | 3.82 | 4.06 | 5.39 | 8.12 | 9.32 | 10.65 | — | 1.19 | 2.58 | 3.85 | 6.91 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.85 | 4.13 | 3.92 | 4.03 | 3.39 | 3.13 | 0.46 | 1.95 | 2.43 | 2.76 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.51 | 9.73 | 11.15 | 11.51 | 12.47 | 11.55 | 9.82 | 1.68 | 6.09 | 7.14 | 8.62 |
| EV / EBIT | 19.22 | 17.61 | 18.78 | 26.95 | 36.55 | 29.79 | 181.71 | — | — | 13.62 | 21.26 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 124.04 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 19.6% | 19.6% | 37.5% | 16.4% | 12.4% | 10.4% | 10.9% | 8.7% | 13.8% | 17.4% | 16.4% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 19.6% | 18.3% | 16.4% | 12.4% | 10.4% | 10.9% | 8.7% | 13.8% | 17.4% | 16.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.8% | 10.8% | 10.3% | 9.2% | 8.4% | -0.4% | -7.1% | -44.6% | -40.8% | 9.7% | 8.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.6% | 8.6% | 9.0% | 9.3% | 8.2% | -0.4% | -9.8% | -83.6% | -42.2% | 8.8% | 8.0% |
| ROA | 2.0% | 2.0% | 1.9% | 1.8% | 1.6% | -0.1% | -1.4% | -9.4% | -9.4% | 2.4% | 2.1% |
| ROIC | 4.0% | 4.0% | 3.9% | 3.8% | 2.8% | 2.5% | 4.2% | 5.5% | 4.9% | 6.0% | 6.2% |
| ROCE | 4.0% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 3.8% | 2.8% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.6% | 4.8% | 4.9% | 4.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.87 | 1.87 | 1.92 | 2.28 | 2.32 | 2.18 | 2.00 | 0.70 | 1.70 | 0.98 | 1.01 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 6.21 | 6.21 | 6.46 | 6.95 | 7.63 | 7.62 | 7.24 | 0.80 | 4.11 | 3.28 | 3.26 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.85 | 1.89 | 2.26 | 2.29 | 2.16 | 1.98 | 0.41 | 1.58 | 0.96 | 1.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.14 | 6.14 | 6.36 | 6.87 | 7.53 | 7.57 | 7.15 | 0.47 | 3.80 | 3.20 | 3.23 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 55.60 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.76 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.47 | 0.25 | -10.82 | -9.90 | 3.44 | 2.76 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.05 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 1.33 | 0.22 | 0.88 | 0.81 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.92 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 1.25 | 0.21 | 0.81 | 0.75 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.26 |
| Inventory Turnover | 24.45 | 24.45 | 18.61 | 23.48 | 22.56 | 31.04 | 26.21 | 24.17 | 26.07 | 29.42 | 31.91 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.8% | 0.6% | 0.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.4% | 3.0% |
| Payout Ratio | 8.1% | 8.1% | 3.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 61.5% | 65.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.5% | 7.3% | 5.7% | 5.8% | 5.2% | — | — | — | — | 7.2% | 4.6% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.5% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.8% | 0.6% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.4% | 3.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2.2B | $2.1B | $2.1B | $2.1B | $2.0B | $1.3B | $528M | $517M | $513M | $501M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PCG stock.
PG&E Corporation's current P/E ratio is 10.5x. The historical average is 16.2x. This places it at the 9th percentile of its historical range.
PG&E Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 9.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 7.2x.
PG&E Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 8.6%. The historical average is 2.4%.
Based on historical data, PG&E Corporation is trading at a P/E of 10.5x. This is at the 9th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
PG&E Corporation's current dividend yield is 0.81% with a payout ratio of 8.1%.
PG&E Corporation has 19.6% gross margin and 19.6% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
PG&E Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 6.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Wildfire liability and regulatory exposure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discount Persists Despite Earnings Growth
PCG trades at 14.9x trailing earnings versus 19.4x for DUK and 19.2x for ED, with a 0.6% dividend yield, reflecting a persistent California risk premium. According to peer data, the market prices in wildfire and regulatory overhangs.
The forward P/E of 10.9x suggests the market expects significant earnings growth, likely from rate base expansion, but the current yield of 0.6% is far below the peer average of ~3.2%, indicating that income investors are not being compensated for the risk. The P/B of 1.18x is at a discount to peers like SO (2.61x) and DUK (1.80x), implying the market assigns a lower multiple to PCG's rate base quality. This valuation gap may narrow if the company demonstrates consistent regulatory recovery and wildfire risk mitigation, but the discount is likely to persist until the liability overhang is resolved.
Earned ROE Trails Authorized Levels
Quarterly ROE has ranged from 1.8% to 2.9% over the past ten quarters, well below the typical authorized ROE of 10-11% for California utilities. As reported in financial statements, this gap suggests regulatory lag and wildfire mitigation costs are eroding returns.
The annualized ROE of roughly 8-11% (based on quarterly figures) appears to be below the authorized return, indicating that the regulatory compact is not fully compensating shareholders for the risks undertaken. The gap may be due to the timing of cost recovery and the heavy capital expenditure program, which inflates the rate base before earnings are recognized. Investors should monitor whether the CPUC allows catch-up adjustments in future rate cases, as a persistent shortfall could signal a strained regulatory relationship.
Operating Margin Stability Masks Cost Pressures
Operating margin has held steady around 19-21% over the last year, but Q2 2026 net margin of 12.9% was boosted by one-time items. Based on quarterly data, O&M for vegetation management and grid hardening appears to be rising, potentially outpacing rate recovery.
The stability in operating margin suggests that fuel and purchased power costs are being passed through effectively, but the underlying O&M escalation may not be fully recoverable in current rates. The Q2 2026 net margin of 12.9% is above the trailing average, but this may be inflated by regulatory adjustments, as noted in prior income statement analysis. If cost recovery lags, margins could compress, especially if the CPUC disallows certain safety-related expenditures.
Leverage Creeps Higher Amid Heavy CAPEX
Debt-to-capital has remained at 0.65 over the last year, but total debt rose to $64.7B in Q2 2026, with interest coverage of 1.85x, as per balance sheet data. This suggests increasing reliance on debt to fund the capital program.
The stable debt-to-capital ratio masks the absolute increase in debt, which is growing in line with the rate base. Interest coverage of 1.85x is thin for a utility, indicating that earnings are barely covering interest expenses, leaving little cushion for adverse developments. The FFO/Debt ratio of 2.92% is well below the 10-12% typically required for a strong credit rating, suggesting that credit metrics are strained. If the CAPEX program continues without commensurate equity issuance, leverage could rise further, pressuring the balance sheet.
Dividend Yield Minimal, Coverage Strong
The dividend yield of 0.6% is far below the peer average of ~3%, with a payout ratio of 14.5% in Q2 2026. According to cash flow data, dividend coverage by operating cash flow averaged 35x over the last year, indicating ample coverage.
The low payout ratio suggests that PCG is retaining most of its earnings to fund the massive CAPEX program, which is prudent given the need for internal funding. However, the minimal yield makes the stock unattractive to income-focused investors, who are a significant part of the utility shareholder base. The strong coverage from operating cash flow provides a cushion, but the company may need to increase the dividend as earnings grow to attract a broader investor base. The current yield also reflects the market's perception of risk, as investors demand a higher total return to compensate for the wildfire exposure.
Valuation Discount to Peers Reflects Risk
PCG's P/E of 14.9x is below EIX's 6.46x but above SRE's 31.77x, while its dividend yield of 0.6% is the lowest among peers. Based on peer data, the market appears to price in a higher risk premium for PCG's wildfire exposure.
The wide dispersion in P/E ratios among peers highlights the market's differentiation based on risk profiles. EIX's low P/E may reflect its own wildfire liabilities, while SRE's high P/E suggests a premium for its diversified operations. PCG's P/B of 1.18x is at a discount to most peers, indicating that the market values its rate base at a lower multiple, likely due to the perceived risk of disallowances. The low dividend yield further underscores the risk premium, as investors are not willing to pay for income without adequate compensation. If PCG can demonstrate consistent regulatory recovery and reduce wildfire risk, the valuation gap may narrow, but this is contingent on external factors.
Misapplied Ratio: P/E vs. Regulated ROE
The most commonly misapplied ratio for PCG is the P/E, which is often compared to industrial companies, ignoring the regulatory compact. For utilities, the authorized ROE is the key driver, and P/E should be anchored to the allowed return, not growth expectations.
Using a standard P/E analysis for PCG can be misleading because the earnings power is determined by the CPUC's authorized ROE, not by market growth. A better metric is the earned ROE relative to the authorized ROE, which indicates the health of the regulatory compact. Additionally, the P/E can be distorted by one-time items and regulatory adjustments, as seen in Q2 2026. Investors should focus on the ratio of earned ROE to authorized ROE and the trend in rate base growth, rather than the P/E alone. This approach provides a clearer picture of the company's ability to generate sustainable returns within the regulatory framework.