Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 10.7x · EV/EBITDA 7.5x · ROE 17.7%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $22.9B | $23.4B | $22.9B | $22.8B | $10.8B | $14.9B | $11.6B | $10.7B | $7.4B | $10.2B | $6.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $23.3B | $23.8B | $23.5B | $23.6B | $12.5B | $15.8B | $12.3B | $12.7B | $9.6B | $13.3B | $9.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 10.68 | 10.54 | 7.41 | 8.81 | 4.14 | 7.69 | 8.32 | 10.60 | 7.24 | 23.09 | 10.50 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.32 | 1.35 | 1.27 | 1.42 | 0.67 | 1.08 | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.73 | 1.19 | 0.82 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.82 | 1.80 | 1.89 | 2.20 | 1.21 | 1.98 | 1.77 | 1.96 | 1.54 | 2.46 | 1.35 |
| P/FCF | 13.10 | 13.38 | 14.63 | 10.85 | 19.35 | 15.95 | 6.73 | 10.48 | 5.32 | 16.17 | 217.02 |
| P/OCF | 12.24 | 12.50 | 13.59 | 10.39 | 16.09 | 14.80 | 6.51 | 9.91 | 5.11 | 15.39 | 92.11 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.37 | 1.31 | 1.47 | 0.78 | 1.15 | 1.12 | 1.24 | 0.95 | 1.56 | 1.18 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.49 | 7.65 | 5.92 | 6.79 | 3.55 | 6.03 | 6.79 | 9.11 | 6.91 | 13.23 | 8.76 |
| EV / EBIT | 7.77 | 8.17 | 5.87 | 6.84 | 3.63 | 6.31 | 7.10 | 9.47 | 7.16 | 14.20 | 9.66 |
| EV / FCF | — | 13.61 | 15.07 | 11.21 | 22.44 | 17.01 | 7.13 | 12.44 | 6.94 | 21.14 | 311.51 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 26.4% | 26.4% | 29.1% | 29.4% | 30.2% | 27.5% | 25.2% | 23.5% | 23.3% | 21.7% | 25.4% |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 17.3% | 21.7% | 21.1% | 21.5% | 18.6% | 15.8% | 13.1% | 13.2% | 11.2% | 12.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.8% | 12.8% | 17.2% | 16.2% | 16.4% | 14.2% | 12.7% | 10.0% | 10.0% | 5.2% | 7.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 17.7% | 17.7% | 27.4% | 27.0% | 31.9% | 27.7% | 23.4% | 19.8% | 22.8% | 10.1% | 12.8% |
| ROA | 12.5% | 12.5% | 18.4% | 16.9% | 18.6% | 15.2% | 12.3% | 9.7% | 10.3% | 4.5% | 6.2% |
| ROIC | 17.2% | 17.2% | 24.3% | 23.4% | 27.0% | 24.4% | 17.8% | 13.8% | 14.1% | 9.8% | 10.7% |
| ROCE | 20.0% | 20.0% | 28.2% | 27.6% | 32.3% | 27.3% | 20.2% | 16.6% | 18.0% | 12.9% | 13.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.51 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.74 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.59 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 1.07 | 1.83 | 2.34 | 2.42 | 3.42 | 3.36 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.76 | 0.59 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.49 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 1.44 | 1.61 | 3.11 | 2.66 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.23 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 3.09 | 1.06 | 0.40 | 1.97 | 1.61 | 4.97 | 94.48 |
| Interest Coverage | 4812.10 | 4812.10 | 8364.00 | 7355.51 | 12112.12 | 5000.69 | 407.94 | 2294.79 | 2181.49 | 1867.46 | 1362.30 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.91 | 5.91 | 5.72 | 4.87 | 4.10 | 3.26 | 3.40 | 3.93 | 3.85 | 3.15 | 3.17 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.47 | 0.62 | 0.91 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.21 | 0.38 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.34 | 0.51 | 0.81 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.12 | 0.29 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.96 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 1.08 | 1.03 | 0.90 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.75 |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 1.05 | 1.03 | 0.98 | 1.04 | 0.90 | 0.82 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 5.61 | 5.15 | 4.75 | 4.96 | 6.44 | 6.63 | 4.72 | 6.96 | 4.26 | 6.14 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.6% | 1.3% | 1.0% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 2.0% |
| Payout Ratio | 8.0% | 8.0% | 5.4% | 5.5% | 5.5% | 7.6% | 9.3% | 12.0% | 10.2% | 25.2% | 20.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.4% | 9.5% | 13.5% | 11.4% | 24.2% | 13.0% | 12.0% | 9.4% | 13.8% | 4.3% | 9.5% |
| FCF Yield | 7.6% | 7.5% | 6.8% | 9.2% | 5.2% | 6.3% | 14.9% | 9.5% | 18.8% | 6.2% | 0.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 5.3% | 5.2% | 5.3% | 4.4% | 10.1% | 6.1% | 1.6% | 2.7% | 4.1% | 9.0% | 9.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.1% | 6.0% | 6.1% | 5.1% | 11.5% | 7.1% | 2.7% | 3.8% | 5.5% | 10.1% | 11.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $200M | $210M | $221M | $236M | $260M | $269M | $275M | $285M | $307M | $342M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PHM stock.
PulteGroup, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 10.7x. The historical average is 10.6x. This places it at the 72th percentile of its historical range.
PulteGroup, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 7.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.3x.
PulteGroup, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 17.7%. The historical average is 11.6%.
Based on historical data, PulteGroup, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 10.7x. This is at the 72th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
PulteGroup, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.75% with a payout ratio of 8.0%.
PulteGroup, Inc. has 26.4% gross margin and 17.3% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
PulteGroup, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.8x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Demand softening and margin compression
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Erosion Accelerates
Gross margin fell to 20.7% in 2026Q2 from 27.2% a year earlier, a 650-basis-point decline, according to reported financials. Operating margin compressed to 11.1%, reflecting pricing power loss and rising incentives.
The sequential deterioration from 24.1% gross margin in 2026Q1 to 20.7% in 2026Q2 suggests that the company is increasingly using incentives and rate buy-downs to sustain volume, which is eroding profitability faster than the prior quarters. Operating margin at 11.1% is the lowest in the ten-quarter window, and with SG&A flat, the operating leverage is working against the company. This margin compression appears to be a cyclical downturn rather than a structural shift, but investors should monitor whether the company can stabilize gross margins above 20% as the cycle matures.
Returns Decay from Peak
ROIC fell to 2.4% in 2026Q2 from 6.9% in 2024Q4, a 450-basis-point decline, based on reported figures. ROE similarly dropped to 3.6% from 7.7%, indicating a sharp reversal in capital efficiency.
The decline in ROIC is driven by both lower margins and a rising invested capital base, as total assets grew to $18.3B while net income contracted. The company's shift to a land-light model (52% optioned lots) may eventually improve capital turnover, but the current data shows that returns are decaying as the cycle turns. The 2024Q4 peak in ROIC and ROE marks the inflection point, and the subsequent quarterly declines suggest that the company is no longer compounding returns at the rate it did during the upcycle.
Working Capital Drag Intensifies
Cash conversion cycle extended to 335 days in 2025Q4, with DIO at 349 days, according to reported data. Working capital changes consumed $517.4 million in 2026Q2, the largest outflow in the period, straining cash flow.
The inventory days on hand remain elevated, reflecting the long land development and construction cycle inherent to homebuilding. The negative FCF margin of -0.3% in 2026Q2, despite positive net income, underscores the cash drain from working capital. The company's ability to manage DPO (20 days) is limited by the nature of its supplier relationships, and the extended DIO suggests that land and construction in progress are not converting to cash quickly, which may indicate slower sales absorption.
Low Debt Masks Off-Balance-Sheet Risk
Debt-to-equity stands at 0.18, with interest coverage effectively infinite, as per the balance sheet. However, 119,218 lots under option may represent off-balance-sheet commitments that understate true leverage.
The reported D/E of 0.18 is exceptionally low for a homebuilder and suggests a fortress balance sheet, but the land option agreements are a form of off-balance-sheet financing that could become onerous if land prices fall. The interest coverage ratio of 999,999 in 2026Q2 is meaningless due to minimal interest expense, but the company's debt service is clearly comfortable. Investors should monitor the land option commitments, as they could require significant cash outlays or impairments if the housing market weakens further.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Strong
Current ratio improved to 5.27 in 2026Q2 from 4.12 in 2024Q1, with cash at $1.3 billion, according to the latest balance sheet. Quick ratio of 0.65 indicates heavy inventory dependence.
The high current ratio is largely a function of the large inventory balance, which is not readily convertible to cash in a downturn. The quick ratio of 0.65 suggests that without inventory, the company would struggle to cover current liabilities, but the $2 billion cash reserve provides a cushion. The liquidity position appears adequate for the current environment, but the negative FCF and working capital drain could erode this buffer if the downturn persists.
Middle-Market Valuation Niche
PHM trades at 11.37x P/E and 7.97x EV/EBITDA, below DHI's 12.36x but above LEN's 10.32x, based on current multiples. ROE of 3.6% lags peers, reflecting cyclical trough.
The valuation multiples are consistent with a cyclical downturn, with the market pricing PHM at a discount to its historical average. The PEG of 0.69 suggests the market expects earnings growth, but the recent EPS miss and revenue decline cast doubt on that expectation. Compared to TOL, PHM trades at a discount, which may reflect the market's view that PHM's premium brand (Del Webb) is less resilient than TOL's luxury focus. The low ROE relative to peers is a function of the cyclical trough, but investors should watch whether PHM can recover to its historical 15%+ ROE as the cycle turns.
Misapplied P/E in Cyclical Downturn
The trailing P/E of 11.37 is commonly used to gauge value, but it is distorted by cyclical earnings troughs, as per reported data. A more appropriate metric is P/B or EV/EBITDA, which better capture asset intensity.
For homebuilders, P/E is misleading because earnings are highly cyclical and can swing dramatically with the housing cycle. At the trough, P/E may appear low, but it can stay low for an extended period as earnings continue to decline. P/B of 1.94 is more relevant, as it reflects the value of the land and inventory, but it also fails to capture off-balance-sheet land options. EV/EBITDA of 7.97 is a better measure of operating performance, but it still ignores the working capital intensity. Investors should use a through-cycle earnings power or a price-to-book adjusted for land option commitments to value PHM accurately.