Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 38.7x · EV/EBITDA 29.0x · ROE 32.2%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.0B | $3.7B | $2.7B | $1.0B | $252M | $290M | $282M | $455M | $417M | $344M | $458M |
| Enterprise Value | $6.5B | $3.3B | $2.4B | $760M | $152M | $180M | $128M | $338M | $382M | $277M | $362M |
| P/E Ratio → | 38.69 | 20.51 | 18.06 | 18.42 | 18.34 | 460.11 | 16.99 | 46.06 | — | — | 29.45 |
| P/S Ratio | 6.32 | 3.36 | 2.67 | 1.44 | 0.47 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.81 |
| P/B Ratio | 10.92 | 5.79 | 5.60 | 2.91 | 0.85 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 1.52 | 1.38 | 1.07 | 1.37 |
| P/FCF | 45.10 | 23.96 | 27.99 | 5.75 | — | — | 4.19 | 7.06 | — | 10.36 | 6.37 |
| P/OCF | 41.57 | 22.08 | 24.90 | 5.50 | — | — | 3.90 | 6.62 | — | 9.33 | 6.11 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.95 | 2.36 | 1.09 | 0.29 | 0.38 | 0.25 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 0.70 | 0.64 |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.01 | 14.48 | 12.88 | 10.69 | 9.16 | 15.78 | 4.12 | 14.36 | 101.13 | — | 12.46 |
| EV / EBIT | 29.98 | 13.96 | 12.20 | 11.03 | 15.47 | 138.56 | 6.25 | 26.90 | — | — | 14.98 |
| EV / FCF | — | 21.06 | 24.74 | 4.35 | — | — | 1.91 | 5.24 | — | 8.36 | 5.04 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 29.4% | 27.0% | 21.1% | 16.0% | 16.0% | 18.2% | 16.8% | 14.6% | 12.8% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | 19.7% | 17.7% | 8.9% | 1.4% | 0.2% | 4.0% | 2.2% | -2.0% | -4.9% | 2.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 16.4% | 16.4% | 14.8% | 7.8% | 2.6% | 0.1% | 3.2% | 1.9% | -1.6% | -2.4% | 2.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 32.2% | 32.2% | 36.2% | 17.0% | 4.6% | 0.2% | 5.5% | 3.3% | -2.3% | -2.9% | 4.6% |
| ROA | 17.7% | 17.7% | 17.8% | 8.8% | 3.0% | 0.1% | 3.5% | 2.2% | -1.7% | -2.2% | 3.3% |
| ROIC | 90.6% | 90.6% | 99.5% | 31.5% | 2.8% | 0.4% | 9.2% | 3.8% | -2.6% | -5.9% | 4.4% |
| ROCE | 37.5% | 37.5% | 41.7% | 18.8% | 2.3% | 0.3% | 6.5% | 3.7% | -2.8% | -5.7% | 4.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.37 | 0.21 | 0.05 | 0.42 | — | 0.08 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.70 | -0.65 | -0.71 | -0.34 | -0.37 | -0.50 | -0.39 | -0.12 | -0.21 | -0.28 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.99 | -1.99 | -1.69 | -3.44 | -5.99 | -9.68 | -4.93 | -4.99 | -9.25 | — | -3.28 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -2.90 | -3.25 | -1.40 | — | — | -2.28 | -1.82 | — | -2.00 | -1.33 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | 6.35 | 90.17 | 54.63 | -36.19 | -99.71 | 162.40 |
Net cash position: cash ($451M) exceeds total debt ($2M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.09 | 2.09 | 1.81 | 1.57 | 1.99 | 2.50 | 2.19 | 2.08 | 2.35 | 2.92 | 2.57 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.90 | 1.90 | 1.61 | 1.41 | 1.71 | 2.25 | 2.01 | 1.90 | 2.17 | 2.71 | 2.35 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 0.84 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 1.11 | 1.17 | 0.79 | 0.42 | 1.11 | 0.83 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.00 | 1.09 | 0.93 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.10 | 1.11 | 1.04 | 0.95 | 1.22 |
| Inventory Turnover | 9.21 | 9.21 | 8.61 | 8.64 | 8.88 | 13.26 | 14.64 | 14.73 | 17.95 | 18.71 | 17.31 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 116.92 | 114.40 | 139.52 | 133.34 | 102.90 | 85.47 | 118.35 | 148.04 | 104.76 | 109.04 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.5% | 1.2% | 4.9% | 4.2% | 4.3% | 2.6% | 2.9% | 3.5% | 2.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 7.1% | 7.1% | 8.4% | 22.8% | 89.1% | 1924.2% | 72.4% | 121.3% | — | — | 76.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.6% | 4.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% | 5.5% | 0.2% | 5.9% | 2.2% | — | — | 3.4% |
| FCF Yield | 2.2% | 4.2% | 3.6% | 17.4% | — | — | 23.8% | 14.2% | — | 9.7% | 15.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 1.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.4% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 1.3% | 5.1% | 4.4% | 4.5% | 3.0% | 3.0% | 3.6% | 3.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $37M | $37M | $36M | $36M | $35M | $35M | $35M | $35M | $34M | $34M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying POWL stock.
Powell Industries, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 38.7x. The historical average is 27.4x. This places it at the 84th percentile of its historical range.
Powell Industries, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 29.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.2x.
Powell Industries, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 32.2%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 9.1%.
Based on historical data, Powell Industries, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 38.7x. This is at the 84th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Powell Industries, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.18% with a payout ratio of 7.1%.
Powell Industries, Inc. has 29.4% gross margin and 19.7% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Powell Industries, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Oil & gas cyclicality
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Pricing for Cyclical Peak
POWL trades at 41.2x trailing earnings and 31.0x EV/EBITDA, well above peers like HUBB (30.7x P/E, 21.2x EV/EBITDA), per reported multiples, suggesting the market is pricing in sustained growth.
The forward P/E of 37.8x implies the market expects earnings to remain near current elevated levels, despite the cyclical nature of the business. The PEG of 0.69, based on consensus growth estimates, appears attractive, but this growth rate may be unsustainable if oil and gas capital spending normalizes. Investors should monitor whether the premium is justified by the record backlog and margin expansion, or if it reflects peak-cycle earnings being capitalized at a growth multiple.
Margin Expansion Reflects Mix Shift
Gross margin improved to 30.6% in 2026Q3 from 24.6% in 2024Q2, while operating margin rose to 20.6% from 15.5%, per reported financials, indicating a favorable shift toward higher-value projects.
The sequential improvement in margins across the last ten quarters suggests that POWL is benefiting from a richer project mix, likely tied to LNG and data center infrastructure. However, the recent EPS miss ($1.42 actual vs. $1.60 estimate) despite strong orders hints that near-term project costs may be rising, which could compress margins if not offset by pricing power. The sustainability of these margins depends on the durability of demand for complex PCR units, which may be cyclical.
ROIC Volatility Masks Underlying Strength
ROIC swung from 50.3% in 2024Q2 to 15.6% in 2025Q1, then recovered to 32.2% in 2026Q3, per reported data, reflecting the lumpy nature of project completions and working capital swings.
The high ROIC in early 2024 was likely inflated by a low capital base and strong project margins, while the dip in 2025Q1 coincided with a margin trough. The recent recovery to 32.2% suggests that the company is generating strong returns on invested capital, but the volatility indicates that single-quarter ROIC is not a reliable indicator of long-term value creation. Investors should focus on the multi-year trend, which appears to be improving as margins expand and the balance sheet remains debt-free.
Working Capital Drags on Cash Conversion
CCC lengthened to 125 days in 2026Q3 from 94 days in 2024Q2, driven by DSO rising to 121 days from 89 days, per reported figures, indicating slower collections on large projects.
The increase in DSO suggests that customers are taking longer to pay, possibly due to the scale and complexity of projects, or that POWL is offering more favorable payment terms to win contracts. DIO and DPO have remained relatively stable, so the elongation is primarily from receivables. This trend, combined with the lumpy cash flow from POC accounting, means that operating cash flow can be volatile, but the company's zero-debt position and $633.6M cash pile provide ample buffer.
Zero Debt Provides Unmatched Flexibility
POWL maintains a D/E ratio of 0.00 and minimal debt of $2.5M, with interest coverage not applicable, per balance sheet data, indicating a fortress balance sheet with no refinancing risk.
The absence of debt means that POWL is insulated from rising interest rates and credit market disruptions, which is a significant advantage in a capital-intensive industry. The company's conservative leverage allows it to weather downturns without distress, as evidenced by its survival through previous energy cycles. However, the large cash balance ($633.6M) could be seen as an inefficient use of capital if not deployed for growth or returned to shareholders, potentially limiting ROE.
Ample Liquidity Backed by Cash Hoard
Current ratio stands at 1.97 and quick ratio at 1.82 in 2026Q3, with cash and equivalents of $633.6M, per reported financials, providing a strong cushion against project delays or economic shocks.
The liquidity position is robust, with a quick ratio above 1.5 indicating that even without selling inventory, POWL can cover its short-term obligations. The substantial cash pile, which has grown from $323.3M in 2024Q2, suggests that management is prioritizing financial flexibility. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a sharp drop in oil prices, the company could fund operations for an extended period without external financing, though the current ratio has declined slightly from 2.29 in 2026Q1, warranting monitoring.
P/E Misleads on Cyclical Earnings
The trailing P/E of 41.2x is commonly misapplied to POWL because it capitalizes peak-cycle earnings, obscuring the cyclicality of the business, as reported in valuation multiples.
For a project-based company with volatile earnings, the P/E ratio can be misleading, as it may appear expensive or cheap depending on where the company is in the cycle. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 31.0x still appears rich, but it better captures the company's operating performance and is less distorted by non-cash items. Additionally, investors should consider the price-to-book ratio (11.6x) and the return on capital to assess whether the premium is justified by the company's ability to generate returns above its cost of capital.