Revenue surged 31.5% YoY in 2026Q2 to $213.8M, but gross margin dipped to 43.9% and operating income swung to a -$203.0M loss, reflecting severe operating leverage and non-cash charges.
Perimeter Solutions, Inc. (PRM) annual income statement — 7-year revenue, gross profit & net income history
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 | Dec'19 |
|---|
| Sales/Revenue | 757.07M | 652.86M | 560.97M | 322.11M | 360.5M | 362.34M | 339.58M | 239.31M |
| Revenue Growth % | 24.25% | 16.38% | 74.16% | -10.65% | -0.51% | 6.7% | 41.9% | - |
| Cost of Goods Sold | 389.54M | 277.71M | 243.88M | 193.81M | 231.85M | 189.72M | 177.53M | 155.43M |
| COGS % of Revenue | - | 42.54% | 43.48% | 60.17% | 64.31% | 52.36% | 52.28% | 64.95% |
| Gross Profit | 367.53M | 375.15M | 317.09M | 128.29M | 128.65M | 172.62M | 162.04M | 83.88M |
| Gross Margin % | 48.55% | 57.46% | 56.52% | 39.83% | 35.69% | 47.64% | 47.72% | 35.05% |
| Gross Profit Growth % | - | 18.31% | 147.15% | -0.28% | -25.47% | 6.52% | 93.18% | - |
| Operating Expenses | 594.96M | 576.08M | 320.85M | 33.84M | -1.41M | 772.75M | 90.57M | 89.66M |
| OpEx % of Revenue | - | 88.24% | 57.2% | 10.51% | -0.39% | 213.27% | 26.67% | 37.47% |
| Selling, General & Admin | 95.36M | 77.58M | 66.9M | 46.51M | 60.32M | 708.95M | 37.75M | 36.2M |
| SG&A % of Revenue | - | 11.88% | 11.93% | 14.44% | 16.73% | 195.66% | 11.12% | 15.13% |
| Research & Development | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| R&D % of Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other Operating Expenses | 2M | 498.5M | 253.95M | -12.67M | -61.73M | 63.8M | 52.82M | 53.46M |
| Operating Income | -227.43M | -200.93M | -3.77M | 94.45M | 130.06M | -600.13M | 71.48M | -5.78M |
| Operating Margin % | -30.04% | -30.78% | -0.67% | 29.32% | 36.08% | -165.63% | 21.05% | -2.41% |
| Operating Income Growth % | - | -5233.95% | -103.99% | -27.38% | 121.67% | -939.63% | 1337.25% | - |
| EBITDA | -146.75M | -126.9M | 61.95M | 159.31M | 195.86M | -538.75M | 129.59M | 52.25M |
| EBITDA Margin % | -19.38% | -19.44% | 11.04% | 49.46% | 54.33% | -148.69% | 38.16% | 21.83% |
| EBITDA Growth % | -1340.1% | -304.84% | -61.11% | -18.66% | 136.35% | -515.73% | 148.03% | - |
| D&A (Non-Cash Add-back) | 80.68M | 74.03M | 65.72M | 64.86M | 65.8M | 61.38M | 58.12M | 58.02M |
| EBIT | -380.83M | -197.11M | -6.4M | 135.19M | 139.81M | -590.91M | 71.48M | -4.78M |
| Net Interest Income | -63.51M | -39.13M | -40.46M | -41.38M | -42.59M | -45.44M | -42.02M | -51.66M |
| Interest Income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Interest Expense | 63.51M | 39.13M | 40.46M | 41.38M | 42.59M | 45.44M | 42.02M | 51.66M |
| Other Income/Expense | -215.74M | -35.32M | -43.1M | -32.87M | -32.84M | -53.41M | -36.74M | -53.93M |
| Pretax Income | -443.17M | -236.25M | -46.86M | 61.58M | 97.23M | -653.54M | 34.73M | -59.71M |
| Pretax Margin % | -58.54% | -36.19% | -8.35% | 19.12% | 26.97% | -180.37% | 10.23% | -24.95% |
| Income Tax | -103.58M | -29.88M | -40.96M | -5.9M | 5.47M | 7.98M | 10.48M | -17.67M |
| Effective Tax Rate % | 23.37% | 12.65% | 87.4% | -9.59% | 5.62% | -1.22% | 30.18% | 29.6% |
| Net Income | -339.59M | -206.37M | -5.91M | 67.49M | 91.76M | -661.52M | 24.25M | -42.04M |
| Net Margin % | -44.86% | -31.61% | -1.05% | 20.95% | 25.45% | -182.57% | 7.14% | -17.57% |
| Net Income Growth % | -527.01% | -3394.77% | -108.75% | -26.45% | 113.87% | -2828.03% | 157.68% | - |
| Net Income (Continuing) | -339.59M | -206.37M | -5.91M | 67.49M | 91.76M | -661.52M | 24.25M | -42.04M |
| Discontinued Operations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minority Interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EPS (Diluted) | -2.14 | -1.37 | -0.04 | 0.41 | 0.52 | -4.21 | 0.15 | -0.27 |
| EPS Growth % | -618.6% | -3282.72% | -109.88% | -21.15% | 112.35% | -2906.67% | 155.56% | - |
| EPS (Basic) | - | -1.37 | -0.04 | 0.44 | 0.57 | -4.21 | 0.15 | -0.27 |
| Diluted Shares Outstanding | 158.66M | 148.81M | 145.71M | 166.45M | 175.08M | 157.24M | 157.14M | 157.14M |
| Basic Shares Outstanding | 158.66M | 148.81M | 145.71M | 154.67M | 160.94M | 157.24M | 157.14M | 157.14M |
| Dividend Payout Ratio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PRM stock.
For fiscal year 2025, Perimeter Solutions, Inc. (PRM) reported total revenue of $652.9M. This represents a 172.8% increase compared to $239.3M in 2019.
Perimeter Solutions, Inc. (PRM) reported a net loss of $206.4M for the fiscal year ending 2025.
Perimeter Solutions, Inc. (PRM) reported an operating income of $-200.9M, resulting in an operating profit margin of -30.8%. This margin reflects the operational efficiency of the business before interest and taxes.
Perimeter Solutions, Inc. (PRM) generated $375.1M in gross profit for the year, representing a gross profit margin of 57.5%. This demonstrates the company's core pricing power and production efficiency.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Earnings volatility and competitive entry
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Fire-Driven Revenue Swings
Revenue surged 31.5% year-over-year in 2026Q2 to $213.8M, but quarterly swings remain extreme, with 2025Q3 at $315.4M versus 2025Q1 at $72.0M, reflecting wildfire seasonality. According to the latest income statement data, growth is highly volatile and weather-dependent.
The revenue trajectory is dominated by the Fire Safety segment's dependence on wildfire activity, leading to pronounced seasonal peaks and troughs. While the 73.6% growth in 2026Q1 and 31.5% in 2026Q2 suggest an active fire season, the deceleration from 102.2% in 2024Q3 indicates that growth rates are not sustainable on a sequential basis. Investors should monitor whether the entry of Fortress North America begins to erode market share, which could dampen the amplitude of these seasonal spikes.
Gross Margin Resilience Amidst Volume Swings
Gross margin averaged roughly 57% over the last four quarters, but dipped to 43.9% in 2026Q2, suggesting pricing power is being tested. As reported in the financial statements, the structural gross margin remains high relative to peers like Innospec (27.7%) and Quaker Houghton (36.0%).
The high gross margin indicates that Perimeter's proprietary formulations and regulatory barriers support pricing, but the recent compression in 2026Q2 may signal either a shift in product mix or increased input costs, particularly for phosphorus. The 2026Q1 gross margin of 22.5% is an outlier, likely due to low volume absorption of fixed costs, underscoring the operating leverage inherent in the business. If Fortress gains traction, pricing power could erode further, pressuring gross margins toward the peer average.
Fixed Costs Overwhelm Seasonal Revenue
Operating income swung from a positive $72.5M in 2026Q1 to a loss of $203.0M in 2026Q2, despite only a 71% revenue increase, indicating severe operating leverage. Based on the income statement data, SG&A remained relatively stable, but non-cash charges appear to be the primary driver of the losses.
The extreme volatility in operating margin, from 58.0% in 2026Q1 to -95.0% in 2026Q2, suggests that fixed costs, including amortization and stock-based compensation, are not scaling with revenue. The negative operating income in several quarters despite high gross profits implies that the company's cost structure is not well-aligned with its seasonal revenue pattern. This may indicate that the business requires a higher baseline of revenue to cover its fixed overhead, which is a concern if fire seasons become less predictable.
Non-Cash Charges Distort Earnings
Net income swung from a $144.2M gain in 2024Q4 to a $181.6M loss in 2026Q2, with EPS ranging from $0.90 to -$1.11, reflecting significant non-cash items. According to the reported figures, stock-based compensation and amortization appear to be major contributors to the earnings volatility.
The quality of reported earnings is low, as the large swings in net income are not mirrored by cash flows, given the substantial non-cash charges. The $70.1M stock-based compensation in 2024Q1 and the negative SBC in 2025Q1 suggest that the company's incentive structure may be causing significant earnings distortion. Investors should adjust for these non-cash items to assess the underlying cash-generative ability of the business, which appears more stable than the reported net income suggests.
SG&A Discipline Amidst Revenue Volatility
SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, ranging from $13.5M to $27.0M over the past ten quarters, despite revenue fluctuating between $59.0M and $315.4M. As per the income statement data, this suggests management is controlling overhead, but the lack of R&D investment may be a concern.
The stability of SG&A indicates that the company is not aggressively scaling its cost base with revenue, which is positive for operating leverage when volumes are high. However, the absence of R&D expenses is notable for a specialty chemical company, potentially limiting its ability to innovate and respond to regulatory changes like PFAS bans. The high fixed cost base, including amortization, is a primary driver of the operating losses, and investors should monitor whether management can reduce these costs to achieve profitability.
2024Q4: A Mirage of Profitability
The most striking inflection occurred in 2024Q4, when net income reached $144.2M on revenue of $86.2M, a net margin of 167.2%, which appears to be driven by one-time tax benefits or non-operating gains. According to the income statement data, this quarter is an outlier that masks the underlying earnings volatility.
The 2024Q4 results are not indicative of the company's operational performance, as the net income far exceeded revenue, suggesting a significant non-operating gain, likely from a tax valuation allowance release or a one-time settlement. This quarter creates a misleading baseline for comparison, and investors should focus on the underlying operating trends, which show persistent losses in many quarters. The subsequent quarters, including 2025Q3 and 2026Q2, with large losses, highlight the true earnings power of the business.
The Bear Case: Structural Losses and Competitive Threat
Despite high gross margins, the company has reported operating losses in six of the last ten quarters, with cumulative operating income of -$325.3M, suggesting that the business model may not be sustainable. As reported in the income statement data, the entry of Fortress North America could further erode pricing and market share.
Short-sellers would argue that the persistent operating losses, even during peak fire seasons, indicate that the company's cost structure is bloated and that the moat is not as strong as perceived. The 2026Q2 operating loss of $203.0M, despite revenue of $213.8M, is particularly alarming and may signal a fundamental deterioration in profitability. Additionally, the reliance on non-cash charges to explain losses is not reassuring, as it suggests that the company may be masking underlying cash flow issues. If Fortress gains QPL approval, the competitive dynamics could shift, leading to margin compression and further losses.