Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 16.6x · EV/EBITDA 18.9x · ROE 15.2%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.3B | $1.7B | $1.8B | $2.3B | $1.5B | $2.6B | $3.4B | $2.2B | $4.1B | $1.9B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $1.9B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $2.0B | $1.0B | $2.0B | $2.9B | $1.5B | $3.0B | $1.9B | $2.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 16.64 | 11.79 | — | 202.94 | — | — | — | — | 3.98 | 78.31 | 569.40 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.80 | 2.07 | 2.36 | 3.55 | 2.44 | 4.82 | 7.76 | 5.86 | 14.33 | 2.02 | 2.58 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.44 | 1.73 | 1.85 | 2.47 | 1.57 | 2.40 | 3.18 | 2.05 | 3.08 | 2.47 | 3.08 |
| P/FCF | 13.58 | 10.03 | 11.38 | 22.71 | 41.40 | 34.66 | — | — | — | 34.14 | 42.60 |
| P/OCF | 13.47 | 9.95 | 11.30 | 21.81 | 36.52 | 32.67 | — | — | — | 16.51 | 19.63 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.64 | 1.85 | 3.11 | 1.74 | 3.80 | 6.50 | 4.03 | 10.62 | 2.11 | 2.65 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.91 | 13.07 | 61.14 | 89.41 | — | — | — | — | — | 31.26 | 23.70 |
| EV / EBIT | 21.77 | 13.57 | 60.08 | 58.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 7.94 | 8.94 | 19.85 | 29.53 | 27.34 | — | — | — | 35.75 | 43.70 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 70.7% | 70.7% | 71.0% | 72.8% | 71.5% | 72.1% | 67.5% | 59.9% | 57.7% | 49.2% | 45.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | 10.9% | 0.7% | 1.7% | -21.1% | -12.4% | -27.2% | -47.5% | -69.4% | 1.2% | 1.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 18.0% | 18.0% | -0.1% | 1.8% | -19.9% | -6.4% | -20.4% | -32.7% | 360.1% | 2.6% | 0.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 15.2% | 15.2% | -0.1% | 1.3% | -11.9% | -3.2% | -8.3% | -10.3% | 98.9% | 3.2% | 0.6% |
| ROA | 11.4% | 11.4% | -0.1% | 1.0% | -9.5% | -2.6% | -7.0% | -9.0% | 76.7% | 1.9% | 0.3% |
| ROIC | 11.1% | 11.1% | 0.7% | 1.5% | -18.3% | -9.4% | -19.8% | -41.1% | -26.9% | 1.0% | 1.6% |
| ROCE | 8.7% | 8.7% | 0.5% | 1.1% | -11.7% | -5.8% | -10.7% | -14.4% | -16.5% | 1.0% | 1.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.02 | — | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.29 | 0.29 | 1.60 | 1.84 | — | — | — | — | — | 3.70 | 2.33 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.36 | -0.40 | -0.31 | -0.45 | -0.51 | -0.52 | -0.64 | -0.80 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -3.44 | -3.44 | -16.68 | -12.86 | — | — | — | — | — | 1.41 | 0.60 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -2.09 | -2.44 | -2.86 | -11.87 | -7.32 | — | — | — | 1.61 | 1.10 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | 136.15 | 79.81 | -323.74 | — | — | — | — | -12.91 | -17.17 |
Net cash position: cash ($380M) exceeds total debt ($30M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.47 | 2.47 | 2.65 | 2.78 | 4.09 | 4.42 | 5.00 | 5.55 | 12.53 | 2.02 | 1.60 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.47 | 2.47 | 2.65 | 2.78 | 4.09 | 4.42 | 5.00 | 5.55 | 12.53 | 2.02 | 1.60 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.46 | 1.46 | 1.70 | 1.70 | 2.84 | 3.29 | 3.51 | 4.45 | 11.16 | 0.80 | 0.74 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.29 | 0.19 | 0.76 | 0.71 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 100.22 | 95.89 | 110.02 | 113.97 | 123.38 | 155.74 | 133.08 | 136.19 | 24.68 | 63.80 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.0% | 8.5% | — | 0.5% | — | — | — | — | 25.1% | 1.3% | 0.2% |
| FCF Yield | 7.4% | 10.0% | 8.8% | 4.4% | 2.4% | 2.9% | — | — | — | 2.9% | 2.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 8.5% | 11.6% | 5.8% | 2.6% | 10.3% | 2.3% | 1.2% | 8.2% | 14.1% | 4.8% | 1.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 8.5% | 11.6% | 5.8% | 2.6% | 10.3% | 2.3% | 1.2% | 8.2% | 14.1% | 4.8% | 1.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $63M | $67M | $68M | $66M | $68M | $66M | $68M | $75M | $82M | $80M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RAMP stock.
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 16.6x. The historical average is 32.7x. This places it at the 27th percentile of its historical range.
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 18.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 18.4x.
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 15.2%. The historical average is 7.0%.
Based on historical data, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 16.6x. This is at the 27th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. has 70.7% gross margin and 10.9% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.3x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
SBC dilution and revenue concentration
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Tempered by SBC Overhang
Operating margin swung from -8.3% in 2024Q4 to 9.4% in 2027Q1, per financial statements, yet SBC of $20.9M exceeds operating income, suggesting reported profitability overstates cash generation.
The ten-quarter trajectory shows a clear inflection: operating margin improved from negative territory to 9.4% by 2027Q1, driven by cost discipline as SG&A and R&D fell from 79% to 58% of revenue. However, gross margin has plateaued near 70%, below peers like IAS (78.5%) and DV (82.2%), indicating a structural gap in pricing power or cost structure. Net margin volatility, including a 34.4% spike in 2026Q4 likely from a one-time tax benefit, underscores that core earning power is better measured by operating margin, which remains modest relative to revenue scale.
ROIC Recovery Signals Efficiency Gains
ROIC improved from -1.9% in 2024Q4 to 2.4% in 2027Q1, per reported figures, reflecting margin recovery rather than asset efficiency, as asset turnover stayed flat near 0.16.
The return on invested capital has turned positive after a period of negative returns, but the magnitude remains low, suggesting the business is still in early stages of compounding. The improvement is driven entirely by margin expansion, as asset turnover has been stagnant at approximately 0.16, indicating that the asset base (largely goodwill and intangibles) is not generating proportionally higher revenue. ROE of 1.8% in 2027Q1, while improved, is far below the cost of equity, implying that value creation is still nascent and investors should monitor whether returns can scale beyond single digits.
Working Capital Drags Cash Conversion
DSO improved from 106 days in 2024Q4 to 95 days in 2027Q1, per financial statements, but DPO extended to 186 days, suggesting supplier leverage is offsetting slower collections.
The cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to missing DIO, but the available data shows a mixed picture: DSO has declined by 11 days, indicating improved collections, while DPO has risen from 162 to 186 days, which may reflect delayed payments to suppliers. This combination could be a deliberate working capital strategy, but it also raises questions about the sustainability of extending payables. Asset turnover remains low at 0.17, consistent with an asset-light model where revenue is generated from intangibles rather than physical assets, but the efficiency of converting those intangibles into cash flow is still suboptimal.
Minimal Debt Masks Off-Balance-Sheet Risks
D/E stands at 0.03 with D/EBITDA of 1.41 in 2027Q1, per reported figures, indicating a conservative capital structure, but interest coverage is unavailable, limiting full assessment.
The balance sheet shows negligible debt, with total debt declining to $33.1M, providing ample financial flexibility. However, the D/EBITDA ratio of 1.41, while low, suggests that EBITDA is modest relative to debt, and the absence of interest coverage data prevents a complete evaluation of debt service capacity. The company's operating lease obligations and other off-balance-sheet items are not disclosed in the provided data, so investors should not assume the low D/E fully captures all fixed commitments. The conservative leverage is a positive, but the lack of coverage data warrants caution.
Liquidity Buffer Supports Strategic Flexibility
Current ratio of 2.66 and quick ratio of 2.66 in 2027Q1, per financial statements, indicate a strong liquidity position, with cash of $363.5M providing a cushion.
The current and quick ratios are identical, suggesting that inventory is negligible, consistent with a software business. The liquidity position has remained stable around 2.5-3.0 over the past ten quarters, indicating a consistent buffer against operational shocks. However, the company's cash flow has been volatile, with FCF margin swinging from -8.3% to 32.6%, so the liquidity cushion is essential to absorb timing differences. The high cash balance also supports strategic initiatives, but investors should monitor whether excess cash is deployed efficiently, as buybacks have exceeded FCF in recent quarters.
P/E Misleads on True Earnings Power
P/E of 16.82 appears reasonable, but SBC of $20.9M exceeds operating income, per reported figures, suggesting reported earnings overstate economic profitability.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for LiveRamp is the P/E multiple, because reported net income is inflated by non-cash items like stock-based compensation and one-time tax benefits. In 2027Q1, SBC of $20.9M exceeded operating income of $20.2M, implying that if SBC were treated as a cash expense, the company would be operating at a loss. A more appropriate valuation metric would be EV/EBITDA, which at 19.15 is elevated, or P/FCF at 13.73, which better reflects cash generation. Investors should adjust for SBC by using price-to-cash earnings or EV/EBITDAR to capture the true economic cost of employee compensation.