Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -8.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -107.9%. (2017–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.8B | $710M | $785M | $544M | $1.0B | $887M | $1.4B | $342M | $353M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.7B | $613M | $751M | $545M | $942M | $813M | $1.3B | $324M | $334M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -8.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 12.08 | 4.27 | 1.89 | 1.45 | 1.85 | 2.16 | 2.83 | 1.86 | 2.56 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -107.9% | -107.9% | -62.6% | -46.4% | -36.1% | -25.9% | -23.7% | -32.7% | -56.2% | — | — |
| ROA | -71.0% | -71.0% | -47.6% | -38.0% | -31.5% | -23.5% | -20.8% | -27.1% | -28.1% | -44.8% | -33.8% |
| ROIC | -106.7% | -106.7% | -51.9% | -41.7% | -32.9% | -26.5% | -24.1% | -29.6% | -63.5% | — | — |
| ROCE | -83.8% | -83.8% | -55.9% | -44.3% | -33.6% | -25.1% | -22.0% | -30.7% | -30.3% | -47.6% | -46.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.05 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.59 | -0.08 | 0.00 | -0.15 | -0.18 | -0.30 | -0.10 | -0.14 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -34.50 | -34.50 | -32.92 | -34.96 | -41.87 | -53.52 | -26.35 | -27.68 | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($209M) exceeds total debt ($112M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.79 | 4.79 | 7.95 | 10.72 | 17.52 | 19.46 | 33.25 | 14.68 | 14.26 | 12.53 | 11.29 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.79 | 4.79 | 7.95 | 10.72 | 17.52 | 19.46 | 33.25 | 14.68 | 14.26 | 12.53 | 11.29 |
| Cash Ratio | 4.62 | 4.62 | 7.76 | 10.40 | 17.25 | 19.06 | 32.74 | 14.20 | 13.64 | 11.92 | 10.37 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $93M | $81M | $67M | $58M | $52M | $46M | $34M | $23M | $31M | $31M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying REPL stock.
Replimune Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -8.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Replimune Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -107.9%. The historical average is -48.9%.
Based on historical data, Replimune Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -8.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Rapid cash runway depletion
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Leverage Surge Amidst Equity Erosion
The debt-to-equity ratio has rapidly expanded from 0.20 to 1.06 over nine quarters, indicating a strategic shift toward debt financing as the equity base shrinks from accumulated operational losses, a dynamic that significantly alters the company's capital structure risk profile.
This sharp increase in leverage, from a minimal 0.16 D/E in 2025Q3 to 1.06 in 2027Q1, appears to be a direct result of funding ongoing clinical operations as cash reserves decline. The rising leverage, coupled with negative interest coverage ratios, suggests that debt service is currently not supported by operating performance, increasing refinancing risk and potentially limiting access to future non-dilutive capital.
Liquidity Buffer Compresses Rapidly
The current ratio has contracted from a high of 13.46 to 5.23 in nine quarters, a trend that appears to signal a meaningful reduction in the company's liquidity cushion as it draws down cash to fund its high-intensity clinical development program.
While a current ratio above 5.0 still appears nominally adequate, the velocity of the decline—from 10.72 in 2024Q4 to 5.23 in 2027Q1—indicates an accelerating consumption of liquid assets. The absence of inventory or receivables data makes the quick ratio identical, but the trend suggests the buffer is eroding faster than the underlying asset base, warranting close monitoring of the cash runway relative to the planned clinical timeline.
Negative and Deepening Capital Destruction
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) has deteriorated from -11.4% to -101.4% over the last nine quarters, a trend that appears to indicate the company is destroying capital at an accelerating rate as its operational investments yield no commercial returns.
This deeply negative and worsening ROIC, as reported in the financial data, is characteristic of a clinical-stage biotech in a heavy investment phase without revenue. The acceleration in losses suggests the capital deployed into R&D and the Woburn manufacturing facility is not yet generating any economic output, framing the entire investment thesis around future clinical success rather than current capital efficiency.
The Misleading Implication of Debt/Equity
The debt-to-equity ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric to this business model, as it interprets a deliberate shift to debt financing as traditional leverage risk, obscuring the primary financial risk which is operational and clinical failure.
For a pre-revenue biotech, the D/E ratio rising from 0.20 to 1.06 is not a sign of traditional credit risk but rather a strategic choice to fund operations via debt instead of more dilutive equity. This ratio obscures the true core risk, which is the cash runway relative to clinical milestones. Analysts should instead focus on the cash burn rate against the $111M balance and the timing of key data readouts to assess the probability of needing additional financing.