Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 27.5x · EV/EBITDA 16.5x · ROE 10.3%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $19.6B | $15.3B | $15.1B | $16.5B | $12.4B | $10.4B | $7.8B | $8.1B | $5.2B | $6.3B | $5.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $21.4B | $17.0B | $16.2B | $16.8B | $13.1B | $12.0B | $9.0B | $9.7B | $7.2B | $8.1B | $7.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | 27.51 | 20.66 | 17.30 | 12.35 | 6.77 | 7.38 | 21.16 | 11.58 | 8.13 | 10.29 | 19.12 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.37 | 1.07 | 1.09 | 1.11 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.89 | 0.74 | 0.45 | 0.65 | 0.68 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.83 | 2.13 | 2.09 | 2.13 | 1.75 | 1.71 | 1.53 | 1.56 | 1.10 | 1.34 | 1.39 |
| P/FCF | 39.08 | 30.40 | 15.16 | 13.73 | 7.01 | 18.54 | 7.81 | 7.67 | 12.14 | 26.58 | 12.33 |
| P/OCF | 23.62 | 18.37 | 10.59 | 9.88 | 5.88 | 13.05 | 6.66 | 6.24 | 7.76 | 15.81 | 9.28 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.19 | 1.17 | 1.13 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 1.02 | 0.89 | 0.63 | 0.83 | 0.88 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.46 | 13.11 | 11.25 | 8.47 | 4.78 | 5.50 | 9.45 | 7.90 | 6.16 | 9.10 | 9.54 |
| EV / EBIT | 20.94 | 16.63 | 13.76 | 9.44 | 5.27 | 5.91 | 14.48 | 8.95 | 7.18 | 11.12 | 13.24 |
| EV / FCF | — | 33.93 | 16.26 | 13.97 | 7.40 | 21.33 | 8.97 | 9.20 | 17.03 | 33.93 | 16.16 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 26.8% | 26.8% | 27.7% | 29.1% | 29.4% | 30.2% | 29.3% | 28.3% | 26.6% | 26.4% | 27.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.2% | 7.2% | 8.5% | 11.7% | 14.7% | 13.9% | 8.2% | 9.2% | 8.3% | 6.9% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 5.2% | 5.2% | 6.3% | 9.0% | 10.8% | 10.0% | 4.2% | 6.4% | 5.5% | 6.3% | 3.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.3% | 10.3% | 11.7% | 18.0% | 27.9% | 25.2% | 7.1% | 14.2% | 13.5% | 13.8% | 7.5% |
| ROA | 7.3% | 7.3% | 8.5% | 12.8% | 18.5% | 16.0% | 4.5% | 8.7% | 8.0% | 8.1% | 4.2% |
| ROIC | 8.9% | 8.9% | 10.8% | 16.5% | 24.4% | 21.0% | 8.3% | 11.2% | 10.9% | 8.0% | 7.4% |
| ROCE | 11.2% | 11.2% | 12.7% | 18.7% | 28.8% | 24.5% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 13.3% | 9.7% | 9.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.47 | 0.40 | 0.46 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.53 | 1.53 | 0.98 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.86 | 1.95 | 1.45 | 1.88 | 2.15 | 2.41 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.31 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 0.43 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.76 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.72 | 1.23 | 1.31 | 1.77 | 1.97 | 2.26 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.53 | 1.10 | 0.25 | 0.39 | 2.79 | 1.17 | 1.53 | 4.89 | 7.36 | 3.83 |
| Interest Coverage | 18.40 | 18.40 | 29.29 | 44.41 | 40.01 | 13.71 | 4.36 | 6.85 | 6.44 | 5.16 | 3.93 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.88 | 4.88 | 3.21 | 5.66 | 3.55 | 3.91 | 5.08 | 4.46 | 4.70 | 4.34 | 4.10 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.30 | 2.30 | 1.54 | 3.23 | 2.10 | 1.97 | 2.76 | 2.02 | 2.10 | 1.88 | 1.76 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 1.28 | 0.85 | 0.28 | 1.12 | 0.26 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.41 | 1.65 | 1.48 | 1.09 | 1.35 | 1.43 | 1.25 | 1.16 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.78 | 4.78 | 4.93 | 5.14 | 6.02 | 4.76 | 4.38 | 4.78 | 4.66 | 4.14 | 4.07 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 39.32 | 37.00 | 37.18 | 34.35 | 43.59 | 38.46 | 36.75 | 39.81 | 40.93 | 40.69 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.3% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 1.4% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 2.1% | 1.9% | 2.8% | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| Payout Ratio | 34.4% | 34.4% | 28.5% | 17.8% | 11.8% | 12.5% | 44.5% | 21.6% | 22.9% | 21.5% | 39.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.6% | 4.8% | 5.8% | 8.1% | 14.8% | 13.5% | 4.7% | 8.6% | 12.3% | 9.7% | 5.2% |
| FCF Yield | 2.6% | 3.3% | 6.6% | 7.3% | 14.3% | 5.4% | 12.8% | 13.0% | 8.2% | 3.8% | 8.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.0% | 3.9% | 7.2% | 2.9% | 5.1% | 3.1% | 4.3% | 0.6% | 9.4% | 0.4% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.3% | 5.6% | 8.9% | 4.3% | 6.8% | 4.8% | 6.4% | 2.5% | 12.2% | 2.5% | 2.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $53M | $56M | $59M | $61M | $64M | $65M | $68M | $72M | $74M | $73M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RS stock.
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.'s current P/E ratio is 27.5x. The historical average is 13.7x. This places it at the 97th percentile of its historical range.
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.'s current EV/EBITDA is 16.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.1x.
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.'s return on equity (ROE) is 10.3%. The historical average is 13.9%.
Based on historical data, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. is trading at a P/E of 27.5x. This is at the 97th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.'s current dividend yield is 1.25% with a payout ratio of 34.4%.
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. has 26.8% gross margin and 7.2% operating margin.
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
LIFO-driven earnings volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression Amid Volume Surge
Gross margin fell to 26.6% in 2026Q2 from 29.2% a year earlier, according to recent SEC filings, while operating margin improved to 9.5%, suggesting pricing power is offset by input cost inflation.
The sequential improvement in operating margin from 5.0% in 2025Q4 to 9.5% in 2026Q2 indicates that the company is capturing operating leverage as volumes recover, but the year-over-year gross margin decline of 260 basis points points to a structural shift in the cost environment. Net margin of 7.0% in 2026Q2 remains above the 5.2% reported in 2025Q3, yet the trend is uneven, with the 2024Q1 peak of 8.3% still unmatched. This suggests that while the business is operationally efficient, its true earning power is being tested by rising material costs and mix effects, which investors should monitor for sustainability.
Return on Capital Cyclical Recovery
ROIC improved to 3.7% in 2026Q2 from 1.5% in 2025Q4, based on reported figures, but remains below the 3.6% level of 2024Q1, indicating a cyclical recovery rather than a structural step-change.
The recovery in ROIC is driven primarily by margin expansion rather than asset efficiency, as asset turnover has remained relatively stable around 0.33-0.42 over the past ten quarters. ROE of 4.4% in 2026Q2 is still below the 3.9% recorded in 2024Q1, suggesting that the company has not yet regained its pre-downturn profitability peak. The low leverage, with D/E at 0.27, means that returns are not amplified by debt, which is a conservative approach but also limits the potential for higher ROE in a rising rate environment. Investors should watch whether ROIC can exceed its prior cycle high as volumes and pricing normalize.
Working Capital Drag Intensifies
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 86 days in 2026Q2 from 99 days a year earlier, according to financial statements, driven by a sharp increase in DIO to 61 days, signaling inventory build-up ahead of demand.
The reduction in CCC from 112 days in 2024Q4 to 86 days in 2026Q2 is a positive trend, but the recent quarter saw a sequential deterioration from 93 days in 2026Q1, driven by a 7-day increase in DIO. DSO has remained stable around 41 days, while DPO has been consistently low at 16 days, indicating that RS is not leveraging supplier credit as much as it could. The inventory build-up, with DIO rising from 61 to 68 days over the past two quarters, may reflect anticipation of higher prices or a slowdown in demand, which could pressure cash flow if not matched by sales. This working capital expansion is a key reason why FCF margin contracted to 1.5% in 2026Q2, and investors should monitor whether this is a temporary phenomenon or a sign of weakening demand.
Leverage Rising but Still Conservative
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.27 in 2026Q2 from 0.17 in 2024Q1, as reported in financial statements, while interest coverage remains strong at 24.4x, indicating ample capacity to service debt despite the uptick.
The increase in leverage is modest and remains well below peers like STLD (0.47) and ZEUS (0.55), preserving financial flexibility. Interest coverage of 24.4x in 2026Q2, though down from 41.9x in 2024Q1, is still comfortable and suggests that debt service is not a concern. However, the D/EBITDA ratio has risen to 3.90 from 3.02 a year earlier, reflecting both higher debt and lower EBITDA on a trailing basis. This trend warrants monitoring, as continued debt accumulation without proportional EBITDA growth could erode the fortress balance sheet. The company's conservative capital structure is a key differentiator, but the recent debt uptick suggests a deliberate expansion strategy that investors should track.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Strong
Current ratio improved to 4.30 in 2026Q2 from 3.18 a year earlier, according to recent SEC filings, while quick ratio rose to 2.27, indicating a robust liquidity position even as cash balances declined.
The current ratio of 4.30 is exceptionally high for an industrial distributor, reflecting a conservative working capital policy and ample inventory. The quick ratio of 2.27, which excludes inventory, still provides a substantial cushion, suggesting that RS could meet short-term obligations even if inventory values were impaired. Cash fell to $235.4M in 2026Q2 from $934.9M in 2024Q1, but the strong current ratio indicates that the company has other liquid assets, such as receivables, to cover liabilities. This liquidity position would likely hold up well under severe stress, as the company has historically demonstrated the ability to liquidate inventory quickly during downturns, generating cash when needed.
LIFO Distorts True Profitability
The most misapplied ratio for RS is the P/E ratio, as LIFO accounting can artificially depress earnings during rising prices, making the stock appear more expensive than its cash-generating ability suggests.
The reported P/E of 29.05 on TTM earnings is misleading because LIFO reserves can inflate COGS and reduce net income during periods of rising metal prices, as seen in the recent quarters. Analysts should adjust for the LIFO effect to derive replacement-cost earnings, which would likely show higher profitability and a lower P/E. Similarly, the EV/EBITDA multiple of 17.30 may be overstated if EBITDA is understated due to LIFO charges. A more appropriate metric for RS would be price-to-cash earnings or EV/EBITDA adjusted for LIFO, as these better reflect the company's true economic earning power. Investors should also consider the cash conversion cycle and FCF yield, which provide a clearer picture of the business's ability to generate cash beyond accounting distortions.