Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 1.6x · EV/EBITDA 9.9x · ROE N/A. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $866M | $533M | $1.4B | $1.5B | $2.0B | $2.8B | $3.5B | $6.2B | $6.0B | $5.7B | $7.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $4.5B | $4.2B | $5.8B | $5.8B | $6.0B | $6.6B | $6.8B | $9.2B | $8.9B | $8.8B | $10.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 1.63 | 1.01 | — | — | — | — | — | 39.37 | 17.74 | 23.56 | 29.01 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.31 | 0.19 | 0.46 | 0.52 | 0.80 | 1.63 | 2.61 | 1.56 | 1.55 | 1.59 | 2.09 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12.22 | 6.54 | 6.16 | 8.17 | 11.28 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13.37 | 13.68 | 15.99 | 20.03 |
| P/OCF | — | — | 19.84 | 27.11 | — | — | — | 10.71 | 8.31 | 8.48 | 10.38 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.51 | 1.91 | 1.98 | 2.38 | 3.91 | 5.12 | 2.30 | 2.30 | 2.45 | 3.00 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.91 | 9.19 | 13.94 | 29.45 | — | — | — | 11.77 | 9.13 | 9.84 | 11.60 |
| EV / EBIT | 12.91 | 20.21 | 25.28 | — | — | — | — | 25.72 | 16.03 | 16.56 | 20.84 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.74 | 20.28 | 24.67 | 28.77 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 56.4% | 56.4% | 30.0% | 23.4% | 15.8% | -3.3% | -30.1% | 24.2% | 27.8% | 30.1% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | 12.7% | 9.4% | 1.6% | -10.3% | -39.4% | -74.1% | 9.1% | 14.5% | 13.7% | 13.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 18.9% | 18.9% | -9.2% | -18.1% | -17.2% | -55.0% | -96.1% | 4.0% | 8.7% | 6.7% | 7.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | -208.0% | 16.5% | 40.4% | 36.6% | 43.7% |
| ROA | 11.5% | 11.5% | -6.0% | -11.0% | -8.5% | -16.3% | -21.8% | 2.8% | 5.9% | 4.3% | 4.4% |
| ROIC | 9.7% | 9.7% | 7.6% | 1.2% | -6.0% | -14.3% | -19.7% | 7.0% | 11.0% | 9.9% | 9.5% |
| ROCE | 10.3% | 10.3% | 7.9% | 1.2% | -6.0% | -13.3% | -19.5% | 7.7% | 11.9% | 10.7% | 10.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.98 | 3.58 | 3.50 | 4.95 | 5.51 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 9.75 | 9.75 | 12.31 | 24.97 | — | — | — | 4.36 | 3.49 | 3.86 | 3.94 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11.72 | 3.12 | 2.97 | 4.43 | 4.93 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 8.02 | 8.02 | 10.57 | 21.66 | — | — | — | 3.80 | 2.97 | 3.46 | 3.53 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6.38 | 6.60 | 8.67 | 8.75 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.45 | -0.10 | -0.43 | -2.64 | -4.78 | 2.28 | 3.54 | 3.45 | 3.07 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.02 | 1.27 | 1.67 | 1.96 | 3.04 | 1.09 | 1.17 | 0.99 | 0.73 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.02 | 1.27 | 1.67 | 1.96 | 3.04 | 1.09 | 1.17 | 0.92 | 0.73 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.77 | 1.04 | 1.37 | 2.41 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.37 | 0.31 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.51 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.59 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 36.09 | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 41.08 | 43.94 | 46.88 | 54.75 | 63.34 | 78.32 | 53.80 | 47.96 | 53.36 | 43.35 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.8% | 1.1% | 2.5% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 2.0% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 96.8% | 45.6% | 63.9% | 59.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 61.2% | 98.5% | — | — | — | — | — | 2.5% | 5.6% | 4.2% | 3.4% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7.5% | 7.3% | 6.3% | 5.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 0.4% | 1.9% | 1.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 3.7% | 3.0% | 4.6% | 3.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $392M | $384M | $347M | $327M | $321M | $290M | $276M | $278M | $278M | $283M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SABR stock.
Sabre Corporation's current P/E ratio is 1.6x. The historical average is 30.5x. This places it at the 14th percentile of its historical range.
Sabre Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 9.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.3x.
Based on historical data, Sabre Corporation is trading at a P/E of 1.6x. This is at the 14th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Sabre Corporation has 56.4% gross margin and 12.7% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Sabre Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 9.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
GDS disintermediation and high leverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Reclassification Masks Underlying Stability
Gross margin jumped from roughly 30% in 2024 to 56% in 2025-2026, per reported financials, likely reflecting reclassification of agency incentives rather than operational improvement. Operating margin held near 13% in 2026Q2, suggesting core profitability remains stable.
The apparent doubling of gross margin from 29-32% in 2024 to 56% in 2025-2026 appears to be an accounting artifact, as the underlying cost structure and competitive pressures suggest real margin compression is ongoing. Operating margin has remained in a narrow 7-16% band over the past ten quarters, indicating that the core business generates consistent, albeit modest, operating leverage. Net margin volatility, including a 118.7% spike in 2025Q3 driven by non-operating gains, underscores that reported profitability is distorted by one-time items and should be evaluated on an operating basis.
ROIC Stagnant Despite Revenue Stability
ROIC has hovered between 1.2% and 3.6% over the past ten quarters, per reported figures, indicating that Sabre is generating minimal returns on its invested capital. This suggests the company is not compounding value, with returns barely exceeding the cost of capital.
ROIC of 2.7% in 2026Q2, while slightly above the 1.5% seen in 2024Q4, remains far below what would be expected for a technology-enabled travel services provider. The stability of ROIC despite revenue fluctuations suggests that the high fixed-cost base and heavy debt load are constraining returns. With negative equity of -$1.1B, traditional ROE is not meaningful, and investors should focus on ROIC as the primary measure of value creation, which appears to be stagnating.
Working Capital Efficiency Shows Mixed Signals
DSO has remained stable between 40 and 52 days over the past ten quarters, per reported data, while DPO has increased from 40 to 63 days, indicating improved supplier payment terms. However, the cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to missing DIO data, limiting full assessment.
The increase in DPO from 40 days in 2024Q1 to 63 days in 2026Q2 suggests Sabre is stretching payables, which may indicate improved negotiating power with suppliers or a deliberate cash conservation strategy. DSO stability around 48 days indicates consistent collections, but the lack of DIO data prevents a complete CCC calculation. Asset turnover has remained flat at 0.15-0.17, reflecting an asset-light model where revenue generation is not heavily dependent on physical assets, but also indicating limited efficiency gains.
Debt Overhang Caps Financial Flexibility
D/EBITDA has improved from 72.08 in 2024Q2 to 36.04 in 2026Q2, per reported figures, yet interest coverage remains below 1.0, indicating that operating income is insufficient to cover interest expenses. Total debt of $4.3B against negative equity of -$1.1B underscores persistent balance sheet strain.
The improvement in D/EBITDA from 72.08 to 36.04 suggests deleveraging, but the ratio remains extremely elevated, reflecting a debt load that is roughly 36 times EBITDA. Interest coverage of 0.80 in 2026Q2 indicates that operating income covers only 80% of interest expense, leaving little cushion for adverse developments. The negative equity position, driven by cumulative losses of -$3.8B, suggests that the company is technically insolvent on a book value basis, though the going concern is supported by cash flows and refinancing access.
Thin Liquidity Buffer Barely Covers Obligations
The current ratio has remained between 0.93 and 1.14 over the past ten quarters, per reported data, with 2026Q2 at 1.02, indicating that current assets barely cover current liabilities. Cash of $676M provides a modest buffer against short-term obligations.
A current ratio of 1.02 suggests that Sabre has just enough liquid assets to cover its short-term liabilities, leaving little room for unexpected cash outflows. The quick ratio, which excludes inventory, is identical to the current ratio at 1.02, indicating that inventory is not a significant component of current assets, consistent with a services business. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a sharp decline in travel demand, the thin liquidity buffer could force the company to draw on credit facilities or delay payments, potentially straining supplier relationships.
Gross Margin Misleads on True Earning Power
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Sabre is gross margin, which jumped from 30% to 56% in 2025, per reported figures, but this appears to be a reclassification of agency incentives rather than operational improvement. Investors should instead focus on operating margin and EBITDA to assess true earning power.
The apparent doubling of gross margin from 29-32% in 2024 to 56% in 2025-2026 is likely an accounting artifact, as the underlying cost structure and competitive pressures suggest real margin compression is ongoing. Operating margin, which has remained in a 7-16% band, provides a more accurate picture of core profitability, as it accounts for the full cost of operations. Additionally, the discrepancy between operating and net margins, with net margin of 118.7% in 2025Q3 driven by non-operating gains, underscores the need to adjust for one-time items when evaluating Sabre's earning power.