Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -30.9x · EV/EBITDA 9.3x · ROE 12.3%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.3B | $2.1B | $3.5B | $4.2B | $4.1B | $6.3B | $12.2B | $4.5B | $2.8B | $2.3B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.1B | $1.9B | $3.4B | $4.0B | $3.9B | $6.3B | $12.1B | $4.5B | $2.7B | $2.3B | $2.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | -30.88 | 19.92 | 59.51 | 55.56 | 60.57 | 431.71 | 64.02 | 41.25 | 30.49 | 23.62 | 25.01 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.76 | 2.11 | 1.95 | 3.05 | 7.03 | 3.60 | 2.84 | 2.70 | 2.40 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.76 | 2.47 | 3.87 | 3.93 | 3.81 | 6.39 | 12.76 | 6.12 | 6.14 | 5.50 | 4.87 |
| P/FCF | 12.42 | 9.69 | 20.54 | 21.07 | 37.20 | — | 107.69 | 52.93 | 26.18 | 22.60 | 20.84 |
| P/OCF | 8.50 | 7.73 | 14.24 | 15.98 | 20.35 | 111.58 | 48.19 | 25.24 | 17.29 | 17.12 | 14.10 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.91 | 1.68 | 1.98 | 1.89 | 3.07 | 6.98 | 3.62 | 2.73 | 2.62 | 2.30 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.33 | 8.09 | 19.84 | 21.17 | 22.90 | 78.86 | 39.12 | 22.49 | 16.19 | 13.55 | 11.13 |
| EV / EBIT | 14.58 | 12.40 | 22.22 | 32.70 | 31.27 | 110.47 | 48.74 | 31.02 | 23.32 | 19.15 | 15.16 |
| EV / FCF | — | 8.83 | 19.54 | 19.81 | 36.04 | — | 106.88 | 53.22 | 25.18 | 21.96 | 19.97 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 45.6% | 45.6% | 44.4% | 42.4% | 41.2% | 38.8% | 46.9% | 49.1% | 51.4% | 52.1% | 50.7% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 6.9% | 3.8% | 5.0% | 4.3% | 0.4% | 14.1% | 11.6% | 11.6% | 13.4% | 15.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 5.2% | 5.2% | 3.0% | 3.8% | 3.2% | 0.7% | 11.1% | 8.8% | 9.3% | 11.5% | 9.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.3% | 12.3% | 6.0% | 7.1% | 6.6% | 1.5% | 22.7% | 18.4% | 21.0% | 22.8% | 19.2% |
| ROA | 8.9% | 8.9% | 4.5% | 5.3% | 4.8% | 1.0% | 16.3% | 13.9% | 15.3% | 16.6% | 13.8% |
| ROIC | 15.5% | 15.5% | 7.3% | 8.5% | 6.9% | 0.6% | 22.5% | 19.5% | 24.5% | 24.3% | 28.5% |
| ROCE | 14.8% | 14.8% | 6.8% | 8.3% | 7.7% | 0.7% | 25.5% | 22.5% | 23.5% | 23.4% | 26.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.08 | — | — | 0.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.77 | 0.23 | 0.30 | — | — | 0.00 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.22 | -0.19 | -0.23 | -0.12 | 0.04 | -0.10 | 0.03 | -0.24 | -0.15 | -0.20 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.79 | -0.79 | -1.02 | -1.35 | -0.73 | 0.43 | -0.30 | 0.12 | -0.65 | -0.39 | -0.48 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.86 | -1.00 | -1.26 | -1.16 | — | -0.81 | 0.29 | -1.00 | -0.64 | -0.87 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | 519.76 | 1249.61 | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($223M) exceeds total debt ($38M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.65 | 1.65 | 1.80 | 2.25 | 2.07 | 1.35 | 1.59 | 1.21 | 1.92 | 1.65 | 1.98 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.30 | 1.74 | 1.35 | 0.77 | 1.09 | 0.62 | 1.34 | 1.16 | 1.47 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 1.34 | 0.88 | 0.11 | 0.63 | 0.20 | 0.90 | 0.65 | 0.90 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.75 | 1.61 | 1.40 | 1.47 | 1.48 | 1.23 | 1.32 | 1.56 | 1.52 | 1.45 |
| Inventory Turnover | 12.26 | 12.26 | 9.55 | 9.99 | 8.27 | 8.45 | 7.04 | 5.99 | 6.88 | 8.16 | 8.51 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 14.23 | 12.35 | 12.49 | 11.66 | 19.24 | 18.66 | 18.99 | 15.38 | 18.19 | 14.82 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | 5.0% | 1.7% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 0.2% | 1.6% | 2.4% | 3.3% | 4.2% | 4.0% |
| FCF Yield | 8.1% | 10.3% | 4.9% | 4.7% | 2.7% | — | 0.9% | 1.9% | 3.8% | 4.4% | 4.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 8.9% | 9.8% | 6.7% | 2.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.1% | 6.2% | 7.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 8.9% | 9.8% | 6.7% | 2.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.1% | 6.2% | 7.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $11M | $12M | $12M | $12M | $12M | $12M | $12M | $12M | $12M | $13M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SAM stock.
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -30.9x. The historical average is 32.3x.
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 16.7x.
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 12.3%. The historical average is 16.8%.
Based on historical data, The Boston Beer Company, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -30.9x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
The Boston Beer Company, Inc. has 45.6% gross margin and 6.9% operating margin.
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.2x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Liquidity buffer compression
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Market Prices SAM as a Stalled Grower
At a 20.37 trailing P/E and 8.13x EV/EBITDA, SAM trades below BUD's 23.69 multiple yet well above TAP's distressed -3.69, per peer market data, while the forward P/E of 22.54 above the trailing figure implies consensus expects near-term earnings to soften further.
The 22.54 forward multiple sitting above the 20.37 trailing figure suggests analysts model a modest EPS contraction, which is consistent with Q3 2026 operating margin of 10.1% down from 11.8% a year earlier and the Q2 2026 earnings miss. Meanwhile, a P/S of 1.01 against a P/FCF of 9.73 indicates the market is not paying for revenue quality so much as discounted cash generation, a framing that prices SAM as a low-multiple value name rather than a flavor innovator. Relative to BUD's 7.6% ROIC and 16.8% ROE, SAM's 9.0% ROIC but 6.0% ROE profile would seem to justify a valuation discount on the equity return side even if the operating returns are comparable.
Returns Unstable Across the Cycle
SAM's ROIC has swung from -5.5% in 2024Q4 to 10.3% in 2026Q2 before easing to 9.0% in 2026Q3, as calculated from reported balance sheet and income statement figures, a volatility range that suggests earning power is episodic rather than compounding.
The dispersion between quarters appears driven more by one-off charges than by steady margin erosion, since gross margin recovered to 48.4% in Q3 2026 from 33.0% in Q4 2025, implying the negative ROIC quarters reflect write-downs rather than a broken unit economics model. However, ROE of 6.0% trailing ROIC of 9.0% in the latest quarter points to a thinning equity base — retained earnings fell roughly 94% from mid-2024 levels per SEC filings — which mechanically flatters ROE over time but reduces the cushion supporting future returns. Compared with BUD's 7.6% ROIC, SAM's 9.0% appears competitive, yet the ten-quarter trajectory does not yet evidence a durable compounding trend, and investors should monitor whether the 2026 stabilization holds through the seasonally weaker Q4.
Working Capital Cycle Tightens
SAM's cash conversion cycle compressed to 13 days in Q3 2026 from 30 days in Q3 2024, primarily because DPO extended to 37 days from 30 while DSO held near 15, according to the company's quarterly ratio disclosures, signaling slower supplier payments rather than faster collections.
The improvement is asymmetric: days sales outstanding have been essentially flat at 14-19 days across the window, so the entire CCC gain comes from stretching payables, which may indicate supplier financing pressure or deliberate terms management rather than structural bargaining power. Days inventory outstanding fell to 34 from 44 a year ago, suggesting better sell-through of the previously troubled seltzer stock, but the low 0.45 asset turnover versus a 0.31-0.50 range over ten quarters means the fixed asset base still converts sales inefficiently relative to capital employed. Read alongside capex at only 1.5% of revenue in Q3 2026, the working capital release may be masking underinvestment in the production base rather than genuine efficiency gains.
Liquidity Buffers Steadily Erode
SAM's current ratio declined to 1.13 in Q3 2026 from 2.03 in Q3 2024, with the quick ratio slipping to 0.92 below 1.0, based on EDBL's reported quarterly balance sheet figures, indicating that immediate obligations now exceed liquid assets excluding inventory.
The widening gap between the current and quick ratios — 1.13 versus 0.92 — shows inventory now carries a larger share of the current asset base, which for a seasonal beverage producer is a less reliably liquid buffer given the obsolescence risk already demonstrated in seltzer write-downs. This compression occurred while D/E remained near zero at 0.04, so the tightening appears to stem from rising current liabilities, which climbed from $333.8M to $503.7M total liabilities over the period per SEC filings, rather than from debt drawdowns. Under a severe demand stress scenario, investors should monitor whether the 0.92 quick ratio can be defended, since the prior earnings miss and falling retained earnings limit the internal flexibility that once supported a 2.0x-plus buffer.
The P/E Misreads SAM's Earnings
The most commonly misapplied ratio for SAM is the P/E, since the 20.37 trailing figure rests on net margin distorted to -33.5% in Q1 2026 by non-operating charges, per the company's quarterly results, making EV/EBITDA of 8.13x and P/FCF of 9.73 more reliable anchors.
The Q1 2026 episode — $21.6M of operating income against a $145.3M net loss — demonstrates that SAM's bottom line routinely absorbs episodic items such as seltzer inventory write-downs and contract manufacturing shortfall fees that do not reflect the run-rate economics of the Twisted Tea franchise. Consequently, a trailing P/E can swing from meaningless negative to seemingly cheap positive within two quarters, which is exactly what the -3.69 peer print at TAP illustrates as an artifact of the same problem. Analysts should instead triangulate EV/EBITDA against BUD's 10.31x and P/FCF, while adjusting reported revenue for shipment-versus-depletion timing, since headline multiples built on distorted earnings and channel-loaded shipments may obscure the underlying durability of SAM's cash flows.