Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 41.0x · EV/EBITDA 26.4x · ROE 14.9%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $62.0B | $81.4B | $64.2B | $24.1B | $29.0B | $119.2B | $95.0B | $17.6B | $3.8B | $2.7B | — |
| Enterprise Value | $59.0B | $78.4B | $65.9B | $25.7B | $27.5B | $114.2B | $90.9B | $16.0B | $3.9B | $2.1B | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 40.99 | 50.62 | 145.34 | 162.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.70 | 3.55 | 3.81 | 1.84 | 2.33 | 11.97 | 21.71 | 8.07 | 4.63 | 6.62 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 5.21 | 6.44 | 7.57 | 3.59 | 5.00 | 16.05 | 27.78 | 14.97 | — | 5.77 | — |
| P/FCF | 13.74 | 18.04 | 21.71 | 13.22 | — | — | 432.61 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 12.33 | 16.19 | 19.58 | 11.58 | — | 571.16 | 170.90 | 251.34 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.42 | 3.92 | 1.97 | 2.21 | 11.47 | 20.78 | 7.37 | 4.71 | 5.13 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.37 | 35.05 | 62.63 | 38.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 31.63 | 34.14 | 81.60 | 75.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 17.36 | 22.29 | 14.12 | — | — | 414.06 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 44.7% | 44.7% | 42.8% | 44.7% | 41.6% | 39.1% | 30.8% | 27.8% | 1.8% | 21.1% | 32.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.1% | 8.1% | 3.9% | 1.7% | -11.9% | -15.9% | -29.8% | -41.0% | -119.6% | -121.3% | -59.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.9% | 6.9% | 2.6% | 1.2% | -13.3% | -20.6% | -37.0% | -67.2% | -116.2% | -135.3% | -64.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.9% | 14.9% | 5.9% | 2.4% | -25.0% | -37.7% | -70.5% | -313.5% | -815.7% | -320.8% | — |
| ROA | 6.1% | 6.1% | 2.1% | 0.8% | -9.2% | -14.0% | -20.6% | -39.4% | -46.0% | -45.3% | -48.7% |
| ROIC | 14.1% | 14.1% | 5.4% | 2.7% | -33.3% | -133.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | 14.3% | 14.3% | 6.0% | 2.2% | -13.7% | -18.2% | -30.0% | -46.1% | -83.9% | -63.9% | -100.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.49 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 1.35 | — | 1.53 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.49 | 1.49 | 3.92 | 6.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.24 | 0.20 | 0.25 | -0.27 | -0.67 | -1.19 | -1.31 | — | -1.30 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.36 | -1.36 | 1.63 | 2.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.67 | 0.58 | 0.91 | — | — | -18.55 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 68.30 | 68.30 | 21.07 | 8.33 | -24.94 | -11.49 | -10.50 | -18.47 | -31.41 | -18.82 | -8689.76 |
Net cash position: cash ($6.4B) exceeds total debt ($3.3B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.58 | 1.58 | 1.49 | 1.44 | 1.83 | 2.11 | 1.93 | 1.87 | 1.44 | 2.70 | 1.17 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.57 | 1.57 | 1.48 | 1.43 | 1.81 | 2.09 | 1.91 | 1.86 | 1.41 | 2.68 | 1.16 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.99 | 1.42 | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.85 | 2.14 | 0.64 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.53 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.38 | 0.21 | 0.71 |
| Inventory Turnover | 57.03 | 57.03 | 67.12 | 57.66 | 66.24 | 51.57 | 47.13 | 58.31 | 21.55 | 33.39 | 58.93 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 131.42 | 130.13 | 122.33 | 96.35 | 96.09 | 98.58 | 75.73 | 140.30 | 163.30 | 96.92 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.4% | 2.0% | 0.7% | 0.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 7.3% | 5.5% | 4.6% | 7.6% | — | — | 0.2% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $638M | $605M | $594M | $558M | $533M | $477M | $437M | $338M | $206M | $325M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SE stock.
Sea Limited's current P/E ratio is 41.0x. The historical average is 119.3x.
Sea Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 26.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 45.4x.
Sea Limited's return on equity (ROE) is 14.9%. The historical average is -134.4%.
Based on historical data, Sea Limited is trading at a P/E of 41.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Sea Limited has 44.7% gross margin and 8.1% operating margin.
Sea Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
TikTok/Tokopedia competition
Margin Expansion Signals Mix Shift
Gross margin improved to 45.6% in 2026Q2 from 41.6% in 2024Q1, as reported in financial statements, suggesting a favorable mix shift toward higher-margin services and advertising.
The 400 basis point gross margin expansion over ten quarters indicates that the revenue mix is tilting away from low-margin logistics toward advertising and digital services. Operating margin has more than quadrupled from 1.9% to 8.0% over the same period, reflecting operating leverage as SG&A costs grow slower than revenue. However, the sustainability of this margin trajectory depends on whether it stems from genuine efficiency gains or temporary subsidy reductions, which warrants monitoring given the competitive threat from TikTok/Tokopedia.
Return on Capital Inflecting Upward
ROIC rose from 0.6% in 2024Q1 to 3.9% in 2026Q2, as per reported figures, indicating improving capital efficiency as the company scales profitably.
The ROIC improvement is driven primarily by margin expansion rather than asset turnover, which has remained relatively stable around 0.20-0.25. This suggests that the company is generating more profit per dollar of invested capital, but the absolute level remains low compared to peers like MercadoLibre (20.8% ROIC). The trajectory is encouraging, but investors should monitor whether ROIC can continue to climb as the capital base expands with logistics infrastructure investments.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
Cash conversion cycle shortened to 49 days in 2026Q2 from 86 days in 2024Q1, based on reported figures, driven by a sharp reduction in days sales outstanding.
The DSO dropped from 93 days in 2024Q1 to 54 days in 2026Q2, indicating faster collection of receivables, likely due to improved payment processing and a shift toward cash-based transactions. DIO and DPO have remained stable, suggesting that the improvement is not from inventory management or supplier leverage. This efficiency gain releases cash and supports the robust free cash flow generation, but the volatility in DSO (spiking to 109 days in 2026Q1) suggests that the metric may be influenced by seasonal factors or accounting changes.
Leverage Declines as Equity Grows
Debt-to-equity fell from 0.61 in 2024Q1 to 0.32 in 2026Q2, as per financial statements, while interest coverage surged from 6.75 to 473.58.
The dramatic improvement in interest coverage reflects both higher operating income and stable debt levels, indicating that debt service is becoming increasingly comfortable. The D/EBITDA ratio has also improved from 23.99 to 5.57, though it remains elevated relative to the absolute level of EBITDA. The balance sheet appears healthy, but the company's reliance on Garena's cash flows to fund e-commerce losses suggests that a prolonged downturn in gaming could strain leverage metrics.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Adequate
Current ratio improved to 1.49 in 2026Q2 from 1.46 in 2024Q1, as reported in balance sheet data, indicating a modest liquidity buffer relative to operating needs.
The quick ratio is nearly identical to the current ratio, indicating that inventory is not a significant component of current assets, which is typical for a digital services company. However, the absolute cash position of $3.5 billion appears modest relative to the scale of operations and the potential need to fund competitive responses. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a prolonged price war in e-commerce, the liquidity position could become strained, but the strong free cash flow generation provides a mitigating factor.
Misapplied Metric: Consolidated P/E
The consolidated P/E of 48.94 may mislead investors because it blends high-margin gaming with low-margin e-commerce, obscuring the true earnings power of each segment.
A single P/E ratio for Sea Limited fails to capture the divergent economics of Garena, Shopee, and SeaMoney. Garena's high-margin, cash-generative business likely deserves a higher multiple, while Shopee's low-margin operations may warrant a lower one. Investors should instead use a sum-of-the-parts valuation or segment-level EV/EBITDA to assess the company's intrinsic value. Additionally, the forward P/E of 35.37 implies that the market expects continued earnings growth, but this may be overly optimistic if competitive pressures force higher reinvestment.