Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 20.3x · EV/EBITDA 6.5x · ROE 6.2%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $831M | $829M | $689M | $882M | $770M | $1.2B | $924M | $1.2B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $1.5B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.3B | $937M | $1.3B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 20.28 | 20.03 | 12.85 | 13.97 | 10.55 | 13.04 | 16.09 | 20.97 | 25.83 | 27.43 | 20.31 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 1.07 | 1.02 | 0.93 | 1.16 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.20 | 1.19 | 1.09 | 1.36 | 1.24 | 1.93 | 1.68 | 2.41 | 2.38 | 2.30 | 2.79 |
| P/FCF | 44.38 | 44.27 | 21.08 | 7.63 | — | 19.85 | 11.53 | 19.99 | 22.16 | 25.93 | 15.98 |
| P/OCF | 14.46 | 14.42 | 8.98 | 6.12 | — | 13.85 | 9.43 | 15.79 | 15.81 | 16.12 | 12.56 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 1.02 | 0.83 | 1.13 | 1.05 | 0.97 | 1.19 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.55 | 6.54 | 7.65 | 6.43 | 6.19 | 7.87 | 6.22 | 8.90 | 8.84 | 8.60 | 10.42 |
| EV / EBIT | 8.11 | 10.40 | 15.36 | 11.82 | 9.45 | 9.98 | 8.54 | 13.28 | 14.21 | 11.00 | 12.62 |
| EV / FCF | — | 79.64 | 39.94 | 9.47 | — | 22.16 | 11.70 | 21.23 | 22.92 | 27.04 | 16.44 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 30.2% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 27.9% | 27.2% | 28.3% | 29.1% | 28.4% | 28.6% | 29.3% | 29.8% |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | 10.3% | 9.5% | 10.4% | 10.1% | 10.8% | 11.0% | 10.5% | 9.7% | 9.2% | 9.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.3% | 2.3% | 3.7% | 4.6% | 5.3% | 7.0% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 3.9% | 3.4% | 5.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 6.2% | 6.2% | 8.4% | 9.9% | 11.8% | 15.6% | 10.9% | 11.9% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 14.5% |
| ROA | 2.2% | 2.2% | 3.5% | 5.0% | 6.0% | 8.4% | 6.1% | 6.6% | 5.3% | 4.9% | 8.3% |
| ROIC | 10.6% | 10.6% | 9.9% | 12.1% | 12.7% | 16.1% | 16.3% | 16.5% | 15.8% | 15.8% | 16.9% |
| ROCE | 12.8% | 12.8% | 11.8% | 14.7% | 16.7% | 20.5% | 19.6% | 20.8% | 20.5% | 20.8% | 21.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.26 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.22 | 3.22 | 3.87 | 1.44 | 1.69 | 0.95 | 0.22 | 0.59 | 0.38 | 0.49 | 0.45 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.33 | 0.42 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.08 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.91 | 2.91 | 3.61 | 1.25 | 1.56 | 0.82 | 0.09 | 0.52 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.29 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 35.37 | 18.86 | 1.84 | — | 2.31 | 0.16 | 1.24 | 0.76 | 1.11 | 0.46 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.36 | 4.36 | 7.73 | 8.49 | 10.26 | 65.33 | 47.13 | 18.37 | 20.08 | 42.41 | 64.35 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.13 | 2.13 | 2.11 | 2.45 | 2.36 | 1.49 | 1.98 | 1.80 | 1.75 | 1.74 | 1.81 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.46 | 0.77 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.71 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.90 | 0.81 | 1.05 | 1.09 | 1.08 | 1.18 | 1.24 | 1.30 | 1.42 | 1.38 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.76 | 1.76 | 1.64 | 1.86 | 1.82 | 1.90 | 2.19 | 2.10 | 2.10 | 2.42 | 2.38 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 47.28 | 52.54 | 43.07 | 44.60 | 50.75 | 64.05 | 40.62 | 52.65 | 45.80 | 46.42 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.3% | 3.3% | 3.7% | 2.9% | 3.0% | 1.9% | 1.2% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 1.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 66.0% | 66.0% | 47.3% | 39.9% | 32.1% | 24.4% | 19.5% | 35.6% | 43.8% | 45.5% | 25.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.9% | 5.0% | 7.8% | 7.2% | 9.5% | 7.7% | 6.2% | 4.8% | 3.9% | 3.6% | 4.9% |
| FCF Yield | 2.3% | 2.3% | 4.7% | 13.1% | — | 5.0% | 8.7% | 5.0% | 4.5% | 3.9% | 6.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.5% | 0.0% | 3.8% | 2.3% | 1.5% | 0.9% | 1.3% | 2.3% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.3% | 3.3% | 5.2% | 2.9% | 6.9% | 4.1% | 2.7% | 2.6% | 3.0% | 4.0% | 1.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $22M | $22M | $22M | $22M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M | $23M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SMP stock.
Standard Motor Products, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 20.3x. The historical average is 20.9x. This places it at the 61th percentile of its historical range.
Standard Motor Products, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 6.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.5x.
Standard Motor Products, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 6.2%. The historical average is 5.8%.
Based on historical data, Standard Motor Products, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 20.3x. This is at the 61th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Standard Motor Products, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 3.25% with a payout ratio of 66.0%.
Standard Motor Products, Inc. has 30.2% gross margin and 10.3% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Standard Motor Products, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Margin compression from tariffs
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Deep Value Discount or Value Trap?
SMP trades at 6.77x EV/EBITDA versus Dorman's 11.64x, yet its forward P/E of 9.0 implies the market expects a sharp earnings rebound, according to recent market data.
The forward P/E of 9.0 versus a trailing P/E of 21.5 suggests the market is pricing in a significant recovery in earnings, likely anticipating that the tariff-related margin pressures will abate. However, the EV/EBITDA discount to Dorman (6.77x vs. 11.64x) may reflect SMP's thinner net margins and higher leverage post-acquisition. Investors should monitor whether the earnings rebound materializes, as the low P/S of 0.49 indicates the market is assigning little value to the revenue base, possibly due to concerns about long-term ICE exposure.
Margin Expansion Tempered by Costs
Gross margin improved to 32.8% in 2026Q2 from 26.4% in 2024Q1, a 640 basis point gain, yet net margin remains thin at 6.1%, as per SMP's income statement data.
The gross margin expansion suggests that SMP is successfully passing through input costs or benefiting from a richer product mix, but the gap between operating margin (10.1%) and net margin (6.1%) indicates elevated interest expenses or other non-operating charges. This discrepancy warrants investigation into the sustainability of the gross margin improvement, especially given the recent tariff refund accounting noise. The net margin of 6.1% remains well below Dorman's 9.6%, suggesting that SMP's cost structure or pricing power is structurally weaker.
Returns Compressed by Acquisition
ROIC fell to 2.8% in 2026Q2 from 4.6% in 2024Q3, as the acquisition-driven asset base expanded faster than operating income, based on SMP's reported figures.
The decline in ROIC from 4.6% to 2.8% over the past two years indicates that the capital deployed in the recent acquisition has not yet generated returns commensurate with the increased invested capital. This is consistent with the surge in goodwill and PPE, which grew significantly over the same period. Investors should monitor whether management can integrate the acquired businesses and improve asset utilization, as the current ROIC is below the cost of capital, suggesting value destruction if not reversed.
Working Capital Drag Intensifies
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 202 days in 2026Q2 from 189 days in 2024Q3, driven by a rise in days inventory outstanding to 190, as per SMP's balance sheet data.
The increase in DIO from 172 days to 190 days over the past year indicates that SMP is holding more inventory, possibly to mitigate supply chain disruptions or to support the expanded SKU base. However, this ties up cash and contributes to the volatile free cash flow, which swung from -$69.4 million in 2025Q1 to $92.0 million in 2026Q2. The CCC of 202 days is notably high, suggesting that SMP's working capital management is a key area of focus, especially as the company's leverage has increased.
Leverage Surge Demands Scrutiny
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.92 in 2026Q2 from 0.35 in 2024Q3, while interest coverage fell to 6.83 from 15.60, according to recent SEC filings.
The sharp increase in leverage, driven by the acquisition, has reduced interest coverage from a comfortable 15.60 to 6.83, which is still adequate but signals reduced financial flexibility. The D/EBITDA ratio of 13.09 is elevated, though this may be distorted by the seasonal trough in EBITDA; the prior quarter showed 16.89. Investors should monitor whether the acquisition generates sufficient cash flow to service this debt, especially if margin recovery stalls, as the thin net margin leaves little room for error.
Liquidity Adequate but Tightening
Current ratio declined to 2.00 in 2026Q2 from 2.66 in 2024Q1, while quick ratio remains low at 0.80, based on SMP's balance sheet data.
The current ratio of 2.00 is still healthy, but the downward trend suggests that the acquisition and working capital needs are consuming liquidity. The quick ratio of 0.80 indicates that SMP relies heavily on inventory to meet short-term obligations, which is typical for a parts manufacturer but poses a risk if inventory becomes obsolete or slow-moving. Given the high DIO of 190 days, investors should monitor inventory valuation and potential write-downs, especially in the context of the evolving vehicle parc.
EV/EBITDA Misleads on Leverage
The most misapplied ratio for SMP is EV/EBITDA, which obscures the impact of the recent debt-funded acquisition and the thin net margins, as per reported financials.
EV/EBITDA of 6.77 appears cheap, but it fails to capture the elevated leverage and the interest burden that depresses net income. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBIT or price-to-earnings, which better reflect the cost of debt and the actual earnings available to shareholders. Additionally, given the significant working capital swings, EV/FCF may provide a clearer picture of valuation, though the P/FCF of 47.08 suggests the market is already pricing in a substantial FCF recovery. Analysts should adjust for the acquisition's impact on EBITDA and consider the sustainability of margins when comparing SMP to peers.