Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.8x · EV/EBITDA 6.5x · ROE 18.3%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.1B | $4.7B | $4.4B | $2.3B | $1.8B | $668M | $793M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $4.7B | $873.3B | $472.6B | $906.1B | $281.4B | $94.5B | $60.0B | $33.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.79 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 0.09 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| P/FCF | 23.24 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | — |
| P/OCF | 9.74 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.44 | 0.39 | 0.94 | 0.26 | 0.18 | 0.37 | 0.34 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.50 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 2.35 | 0.58 | 0.36 | 0.76 | 0.70 |
| EV / EBIT | 8.28 | 1.02 | 0.74 | 6.10 | 0.74 | 0.41 | 1.85 | 0.86 |
| EV / FCF | — | 3.24 | 2.43 | 7.64 | 4.11 | 0.75 | 0.98 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 53.6% | 53.6% | 52.3% | 35.9% | 39.6% | 45.1% | 50.4% | 49.6% |
| Operating Margin | 43.3% | 43.3% | 46.4% | 26.2% | 33.0% | 39.3% | 37.2% | 40.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 24.7% | 24.7% | 30.7% | 5.3% | 20.3% | 24.1% | 5.9% | 26.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 18.3% | 18.3% | 18.1% | 3.8% | 41.1% | 75.9% | 11.7% | 40.2% |
| ROA | 11.1% | 11.1% | 11.0% | 2.2% | 26.0% | 42.3% | 6.0% | 20.2% |
| ROIC | 19.3% | 19.3% | 15.4% | 9.8% | 37.0% | 63.6% | 35.5% | 31.1% |
| ROCE | 21.5% | 21.5% | 18.4% | 11.8% | 44.9% | 75.5% | 40.3% | 34.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.24 | 0.49 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 0.66 | 0.70 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.53 | 1.53 | 0.77 | 2.38 | 0.59 | 0.39 | 0.84 | 0.95 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.49 | 0.34 | 0.40 | 0.59 | 0.50 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 2.34 | 0.57 | 0.35 | 0.75 | 0.67 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.22 | 2.41 | 7.62 | 4.08 | 0.75 | 0.97 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 8.26 | 8.26 | 11.45 | 2.77 | 8.26 | 8.54 | 678.97 | 103.38 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.00 | 5.00 | 2.73 | 3.56 | 3.65 | 1.75 | 1.95 | 2.63 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.56 | 4.56 | 2.72 | 3.49 | 3.56 | 1.69 | 1.88 | 2.59 |
| Cash Ratio | 4.04 | 4.04 | 2.16 | 2.76 | 1.99 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 1.36 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.84 | 1.30 | 0.84 | 0.76 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.71 | 4.71 | 156.97 | 37.13 | 114.07 | 126.90 | 93.96 | 119.60 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 40.40 | 51.64 | 53.82 | 24.52 | 17.80 | 23.71 | 41.39 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.3% | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Payout Ratio | 54.9% | 54.9% | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | 76.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.8% | 10454.3% | 8400.1% | 1035.1% | 1819.1% | 3131.8% | 414.4% | 1150.6% |
| FCF Yield | 4.3% | 5754.8% | 4410.5% | 5222.9% | 3857.9% | 18741.1% | 7692.7% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.3% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $151M | $151M | $151M | $151M | $151M | $152M | $155M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TGS stock.
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.'s current P/E ratio is 12.8x. The historical average is 0.1x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.'s current EV/EBITDA is 6.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 0.9x.
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.'s return on equity (ROE) is 18.3%. The historical average is 29.9%.
Based on historical data, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. is trading at a P/E of 12.8x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.'s current dividend yield is 4.30% with a payout ratio of 54.9%.
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. has 53.6% gross margin and 43.3% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
FX and tariff exposure
Margin Resilience Amid Inflation
Gross margin held at 50.4% in 2026Q2, down from 58.2% in 2026Q1, but operating margin expanded to 40.2%, per the latest quarterly report, indicating strong pricing power.
The sequential decline in gross margin likely reflects inflationary cost pressures, yet the operating margin improvement suggests that TGS is effectively passing through costs or benefiting from higher-margin midstream volumes. The net margin of 25.1% in 2026Q2, while lower than the 33.0% in 2026Q1, remains robust and above the 11.7% trough seen in 2025Q2, indicating that the earnings power is stabilizing. Investors should monitor whether margin compression is a temporary cost lag or a structural trend, especially given the high fixed-cost nature of the pipeline business.
ROIC Recovery Signals Compounding Potential
ROIC improved to 3.3% in 2026Q2 from 2.9% in 2025Q2, but remains below the 6.9% peak in 2024Q2, per reported figures, suggesting a gradual recovery in capital efficiency.
The return on invested capital has been volatile, reflecting the lumpy nature of infrastructure investments and the impact of inflation accounting. The recent uptick in ROIC, coupled with a rising asset turnover (0.09 in 2026Q2 vs. 0.09 in 2025Q2), indicates that TGS is beginning to generate more income from its expanded asset base, likely driven by higher throughput from Vaca Muerta. However, the absolute level of ROIC remains modest, and investors should assess whether the Tratayén expansion will sustainably lift returns above the cost of capital, especially in USD terms.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
Cash conversion cycle shortened to 30 days in 2026Q2 from 54 days in 2026Q1, per the latest quarterly data, driven by faster collections and lower inventory days.
The improvement in the cash conversion cycle is notable, with DSO declining to 54 days from 59 days and DIO dropping to 31 days from 46 days, while DPO remained stable at 55 days. This suggests that TGS is managing its working capital more efficiently, possibly due to better collection practices or a shift in revenue mix toward more cash-generative segments. The reduction in inventory days may also reflect lower gas storage needs or a change in operational strategy. However, the volatility in CCC across quarters (ranging from 2 to 54 days) indicates that working capital swings can be significant, and investors should monitor whether this improvement is sustainable.
Leverage Creeps Up but Coverage Remains Adequate
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.42 in 2026Q2 from 0.27 in 2025Q2, while interest coverage fell to 5.6x from 8.6x, per reported figures, indicating increased debt service burden.
The increase in leverage is likely tied to the expansion of midstream infrastructure, as evidenced by the rise in total debt to $1.7 trillion ARS. Despite the higher debt load, the interest coverage ratio of 5.6x remains comfortable, though it has declined from the 15.2x peak in 2024Q4. The D/EBITDA ratio of 5.7x is elevated compared to the 2.0x seen in 2024Q4, suggesting that EBITDA growth has not kept pace with debt accumulation. Given the USD-denominated nature of some debt, any significant FX depreciation could increase the real burden, and investors should monitor the trajectory of coverage ratios closely.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Robust
Current ratio improved to 3.67 in 2026Q2 from 3.35 in 2025Q2, with quick ratio at 3.43, per the latest balance sheet, indicating a strong short-term liquidity position.
The liquidity position is solid, with cash and equivalents of $289.0 billion ARS providing a substantial cushion against short-term obligations. The current ratio has been consistently above 2.0 over the past ten quarters, and the quick ratio of 3.43 suggests that TGS can meet its near-term liabilities even if inventory becomes illiquid. This buffer is particularly important given the volatility in Argentine markets and the potential for regulatory shocks. However, the high cash balance may also indicate that TGS is not deploying capital efficiently, and investors should weigh the opportunity cost of holding such large cash reserves.
Misapplied Metric: P/E in Hyperinflation
The P/E ratio of 12.96 is misleading under IAS 29, as inflation restatements distort earnings; EV/EBITDA of 6.58 is a more reliable valuation metric, per reported figures.
In hyperinflationary economies, net income can be significantly affected by non-cash inflation adjustments, making the P/E ratio less meaningful. For TGS, the reported net income includes gains or losses from inflation restatement, which do not reflect operational cash generation. EV/EBITDA is preferable because EBITDA is less distorted by inflation and better captures the underlying cash earnings power of the infrastructure assets. Additionally, the forward P/E of 0.01 is clearly a data artifact and should be disregarded. Investors should focus on EV/EBITDA and consider adjusting EBITDA for inflation to get a cleaner picture of valuation.