Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -76.7%. (2013–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $47M | $36M | $23M | $47M | $146M | $312M | $197M | $3M | $19M | $17M | $21M |
| Enterprise Value | $62M | $51M | $32M | $72M | $231M | $320M | $100M | $13M | $20M | $13M | $20M |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.20 | 0.92 | 0.70 | 1.06 | 2.34 | 39.68 | 79.17 | 0.55 | 18.96 | 3.10 | 24.43 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.37 | 1.31 | 0.62 | 0.88 | 1.29 | 2.16 | 1.65 | 0.36 | 1.47 | 1.10 | 2.11 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.29 | 0.97 | 1.63 | 3.71 | 40.64 | 40.19 | 2.13 | 20.29 | 2.51 | 22.64 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 31.8% | 31.8% | 29.0% | 8.4% | 20.8% | -179.3% | 14.5% | 22.7% | -63.6% | 17.8% | 51.3% |
| Operating Margin | -30.9% | -30.9% | -52.1% | -164.2% | -70.2% | -809.8% | -720.2% | -110.1% | -630.5% | -92.1% | -745.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -62.3% | -62.3% | -63.6% | -174.9% | -73.2% | -1604.1% | -16176.8% | -194.3% | -906.3% | -92.0% | -716.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -76.7% | -76.7% | -46.2% | -92.8% | -35.4% | -95.7% | -626.2% | -104.7% | -64.6% | -39.1% | -51.4% |
| ROA | -31.4% | -31.4% | -21.1% | -43.9% | -22.0% | -81.9% | -491.0% | -42.5% | -34.4% | -21.5% | -33.7% |
| ROIC | -20.8% | -20.8% | -20.6% | -39.3% | -18.7% | -54.8% | -65.7% | -30.0% | -36.1% | -36.2% | -54.3% |
| ROCE | -27.2% | -27.2% | -28.9% | -74.4% | -31.0% | -45.5% | -24.1% | -31.7% | -27.9% | -25.2% | -42.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.82 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 1.06 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.13 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.54 | 0.24 | 0.47 | 0.75 | 0.05 | -0.81 | 1.03 | 0.10 | -0.21 | -0.15 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -35.63 | -35.63 | -23.23 | -22.58 | -17.17 | -6317.35 | -339.40 | -13.22 | -7.83 | -1520.15 | -554.84 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.04 | 1.22 | 1.26 | 6.44 | 15.12 | 0.56 | 1.21 | 3.88 | 0.88 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.04 | 1.22 | 1.26 | 6.44 | 15.12 | 0.56 | 1.21 | 3.87 | 0.87 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.82 | 5.42 | 13.99 | 0.04 | 0.58 | 2.68 | 0.75 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.55 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.26 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.20 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 492.45 | 102.75 | 249.21 | 64.30 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 89.34 | 264.80 | 321.98 | 268.45 | 457.91 | 254.46 | 253.41 | 793.71 | 208.94 | 51.75 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $50M | $38M | $34M | $31M | $30M | $14M | $1M | $875869 | $608473 | $391517 |
Liquidity and capital exhaustion
According to historical financial data, Kartoon Studios has struggled with consistently negative ROIC, which reached -66.0% in 2026Q1, indicating that the company is failing to generate adequate returns on its invested capital compared to the cost of funding its ongoing content production and acquisition-led growth strategy.
The persistent negative ROIC suggests that the capital deployed into celebrity-anchored IP is not yielding sufficient incremental earnings to justify the investment. This trend appears to be driven by high amortization costs and operating losses that consistently erode the capital base, warranting further investigation into the long-term viability of the current business model.
As reported in recent quarterly filings, the company's DSO has remained elevated, peaking at 506 days in 2024Q1, which highlights significant challenges in converting licensing and production service contracts into actual cash inflows compared to industry standards for media and entertainment companies.
The extreme volatility in DSO suggests that Kartoon Studios faces structural difficulties in collecting receivables, likely due to the lumpy nature of licensing agreements. Investors should monitor whether these collection delays are a temporary byproduct of contract timing or a structural weakness in the company's ability to enforce payment terms with its partners.
Based on the company's reported figures, the current ratio has hovered near 1.0, with a 2026Q1 reading of 0.98, indicating a precarious liquidity position that leaves the firm with minimal buffer to absorb operational shocks or fund ongoing content development without relying on external financing.
The proximity of the current ratio to unity suggests that the company's short-term assets are barely sufficient to cover its immediate liabilities. This lack of liquidity, combined with persistent operating losses, implies that the firm may face significant pressure to raise capital, which could lead to further shareholder dilution.
With a P/S ratio of 1.20 and negative TTM P/E, the market appears to be pricing Kartoon Studios as a speculative growth play, despite the company's inability to demonstrate a clear path to profitability as evidenced by its recent financial performance and negative operating margins.
The valuation multiples suggest that investors are placing a premium on the potential of the Stan Lee Universe and other IP assets rather than current earnings power. This pricing appears disconnected from the underlying financial reality, where the company's inability to generate positive net income makes traditional valuation metrics like P/E largely irrelevant.
The P/S ratio is frequently misapplied to Kartoon Studios, as it obscures the high cost of content production and the significant amortization charges that prevent revenue growth from translating into meaningful shareholder value or sustainable cash flow generation for the company.
Using P/S as a primary valuation metric ignores the quality of revenue, which is heavily weighted toward lower-margin production services rather than high-margin licensing. Analysts should instead focus on the ratio of operating cash flow to capitalized content costs to better understand the true economic return of the company's IP portfolio.
Includes 30+ ratios · 13 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TOON stock.
Kartoon Studios Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Kartoon Studios Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -76.7%. The historical average is -62.5%.
Based on historical data, Kartoon Studios Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Kartoon Studios Inc. has 31.8% gross margin and -30.9% operating margin.