Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 48.2x · EV/EBITDA 35.2x · ROE 37.2%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23.2B | $19.8B | $25.5B | $12.1B | $18.1B | $9.7B | $5.6B | $6.1B | $4.2B | $3.5B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $23.0B | $19.7B | $25.1B | $11.4B | $17.6B | $9.3B | $5.4B | $5.8B | $4.1B | $3.4B | $2.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 48.17 | 41.21 | 56.08 | 29.80 | 40.57 | 35.86 | 32.01 | 19.01 | 20.10 | 36.05 | 56.20 |
| P/S Ratio | 29.01 | 24.84 | 36.07 | 19.14 | 27.14 | 21.47 | 18.64 | 12.35 | 14.05 | 26.51 | 39.57 |
| P/B Ratio | 15.89 | 13.59 | 22.48 | 11.59 | 23.44 | 14.85 | 11.62 | 11.83 | 17.24 | 33.38 | 49.78 |
| P/FCF | 47.61 | 40.76 | 55.23 | 29.97 | 42.33 | 38.78 | 27.92 | 19.51 | 28.58 | 46.73 | 59.29 |
| P/OCF | 42.42 | 36.32 | 51.89 | 28.90 | 40.51 | 36.51 | 27.24 | 17.68 | 21.58 | 37.39 | 57.88 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 24.70 | 35.55 | 17.99 | 26.38 | 20.52 | 17.72 | 11.74 | 13.65 | 25.91 | 38.74 |
| EV / EBITDA | 35.20 | 30.11 | 44.46 | 22.69 | 30.47 | 24.44 | 23.14 | 14.02 | 13.65 | 26.49 | 38.74 |
| EV / EBIT | 38.92 | 33.25 | 43.35 | 23.38 | 31.29 | 25.53 | 24.65 | 14.41 | 15.71 | 23.65 | 42.16 |
| EV / FCF | — | 40.53 | 54.43 | 28.18 | 41.14 | 37.07 | 26.54 | 18.54 | 27.77 | 45.67 | 58.06 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 85.5% | 85.5% | 89.9% | 92.3% | 95.1% | 93.5% | 89.2% | 93.9% | 95.4% | 99.3% | 99.9% |
| Operating Margin | 74.2% | 74.2% | 76.4% | 77.0% | 84.3% | 80.4% | 71.8% | 81.9% | 86.9% | 90.5% | 91.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 60.3% | 60.3% | 64.3% | 64.2% | 66.9% | 59.9% | 58.2% | 65.0% | 69.9% | 57.7% | 62.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 37.2% | 37.2% | 41.7% | 44.7% | 62.7% | 47.5% | 35.3% | 84.2% | 119.9% | 100.0% | 79.8% |
| ROA | 33.5% | 33.5% | 37.8% | 39.9% | 54.4% | 40.4% | 30.1% | 72.2% | 101.7% | 80.4% | 66.0% |
| ROIC | 42.1% | 42.1% | 74.7% | 125.0% | 172.5% | 126.1% | 78.0% | 178.9% | 259.9% | 757.3% | — |
| ROCE | 43.3% | 43.3% | 47.3% | 50.8% | 74.1% | 59.0% | 39.3% | 94.9% | 132.4% | 132.8% | 101.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.08 | -0.33 | -0.69 | -0.66 | -0.65 | -0.58 | -0.59 | -0.49 | -0.76 | -1.04 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.17 | -0.17 | -0.65 | -1.45 | -0.88 | -1.13 | -1.20 | -0.73 | -0.40 | -0.61 | -0.82 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.23 | -0.80 | -1.80 | -1.19 | -1.71 | -1.38 | -0.97 | -0.81 | -1.06 | -1.24 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($145M) exceeds total debt ($32M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.40 | 4.40 | 8.33 | 13.68 | 11.15 | 7.80 | 8.41 | 14.99 | 14.99 | 15.26 | 18.32 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.40 | 4.40 | 8.33 | 13.68 | 9.22 | 6.18 | 5.66 | 10.61 | 14.13 | 15.09 | 17.96 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.99 | 1.99 | 6.12 | 11.50 | 8.99 | 6.34 | 7.11 | 12.41 | 9.88 | 12.32 | 16.18 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.76 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.82 | 1.05 | 1.04 | 0.96 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | 0.30 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 1.31 | 0.78 | 0.04 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 75.41 | 65.50 | 74.53 | 56.87 | 77.07 | 58.17 | 46.88 | 59.27 | 49.02 | 40.49 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.6% | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.8% | 1.4% | 0.9% | 1.4% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| Payout Ratio | 30.7% | 30.7% | 76.5% | 24.6% | 55.4% | 31.6% | 44.1% | 14.6% | 15.1% | 14.0% | 6.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.1% | 2.4% | 1.8% | 3.4% | 2.5% | 2.8% | 3.1% | 5.3% | 5.0% | 2.8% | 1.8% |
| FCF Yield | 2.1% | 2.5% | 1.8% | 3.3% | 2.4% | 2.6% | 3.6% | 5.1% | 3.5% | 2.1% | 1.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.9% | 1.0% | 1.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.7% | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 1.9% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 0.8% | 1.7% | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $69M | $69M | $69M | $70M | $70M | $70M | $70M | $70M | $71M | $72M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TPL stock.
Texas Pacific Land Corporation's current P/E ratio is 48.2x. The historical average is 30.1x. This places it at the 90th percentile of its historical range.
Texas Pacific Land Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 35.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 38.9x.
Texas Pacific Land Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 37.2%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 66.9%.
Based on historical data, Texas Pacific Land Corporation is trading at a P/E of 48.2x. This is at the 90th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Texas Pacific Land Corporation's current dividend yield is 0.64% with a payout ratio of 30.7%.
Texas Pacific Land Corporation has 85.5% gross margin and 74.2% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Texas Pacific Land Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Goodwill impairment risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Pricing for Royalty Growth
TPL trades at 50.3x trailing earnings and 36.8x EV/EBITDA, far above mineral peers like DMLP (22.1x P/E) and BSM (11.2x P/E), as per market data, implying expectations of sustained double-digit growth.
The forward P/E of 40.5x suggests the market is pricing in continued acceleration in royalty income, consistent with the 31.2% revenue growth in 2026Q2. However, the PEG of 2.23 indicates that the growth rate may not justify the multiple relative to peers, and any slowdown in Permian activity could trigger multiple compression. Investors should monitor whether the acquisition-driven goodwill supports the premium valuation.
Margins Reflect Royalty Purity
Gross margin hit 100% in 2026Q2, with operating margin at 78.0% and net margin at 62.6%, as reported in financial statements, underscoring TPL's low-cost royalty model that far exceeds E&P peers.
The absence of cost of goods sold is a structural advantage of royalty ownership, but the 136.2% gross margin in 2025Q4 likely reflects one-time gains or adjustments, warranting caution. Net margin stability around 60% over the past year indicates that operating leverage is real, yet the reliance on commodity prices means margins could compress if oil and gas prices fall. The 100% gross margin in 2026Q2 is a testament to the asset-light model, but investors should verify that no acquisition-related costs are being capitalized.
ROIC Decay from Acquisition Base
ROIC fell from 33.8% in 2024Q1 to 10.4% in 2026Q2, as per quarterly data, reflecting the dilutive impact of the $852M goodwill from the recent acquisition, which expanded the capital base.
The dramatic decline in ROIC is not due to margin deterioration—net margins remain above 60%—but rather the surge in invested capital from the acquisition. This suggests that the acquired assets may not be generating returns commensurate with the purchase price, and investors should monitor whether ROIC stabilizes or continues to decay. The high ROE of 9.5% in 2026Q2, though lower than historical levels, still benefits from minimal leverage, but the goodwill overhang could impair future returns if the acquisition underperforms.
Working Capital Efficiency Distorted
Asset turnover is a low 0.14x, and DSO hovers near 66 days, as per financial statements, but the negative DPO in 2025Q4 and volatile CCC indicate that working capital metrics are not meaningful for a royalty model.
The low asset turnover reflects the large cash and goodwill balances, not operational inefficiency, since TPL's royalty income requires minimal assets. DSO of 66 days is stable, but the negative DPO in 2025Q4 suggests timing of payables, which is not a reliable indicator of supplier leverage. The cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to missing DIO, but the high FCF margin of 124.2% in 2026Q2 indicates that earnings convert strongly to cash, making traditional efficiency ratios less relevant.
Minimal Debt Masks Acquisition Risk
D/E stands at 0.01 with interest coverage above 200x, as reported in financial statements, indicating a fortress balance sheet, but the $852M goodwill from the acquisition introduces non-debt leverage risk.
The near-zero debt and high interest coverage suggest that TPL has ample capacity to service obligations, but the acquisition was likely funded with cash and equity, not debt, which is why leverage remains low. However, the goodwill represents 45% of total assets, creating a risk of impairment that could erode equity and future returns. Investors should monitor whether the acquired assets generate sufficient cash flow to justify the premium paid, as any impairment would directly hit net income and book value.
Cash Buffer Remains Ample
Current ratio is 4.55 and quick ratio is 4.55 in 2026Q2, as per balance sheet data, indicating strong liquidity, though cash has declined from $531.8M in 2025Q3 to $248.6M.
The liquidity position is robust, with no inventory to distort the quick ratio, and the high current ratio suggests TPL can easily meet short-term obligations. However, the cash decline reflects the acquisition outflows, and if further acquisitions occur, liquidity could tighten. The fortress balance sheet signal is supported by the low debt, but the goodwill concentration is a non-liquidity risk that could impair future cash flows if the acquired assets underperform.
Misapplied Metric: Asset Turnover
Asset turnover of 0.14x is often cited as a sign of inefficiency, but for a royalty company like TPL, this metric is misleading because the asset base is inflated by goodwill and cash, not productive assets.
Traditional efficiency ratios like asset turnover are designed for capital-intensive businesses, but TPL's royalty model generates revenue with minimal tangible assets. The low asset turnover is a function of the large cash and goodwill balances, not operational inefficiency. Instead, investors should focus on cash flow per share or FCF margin, which at 124.2% in 2026Q2 demonstrates superior cash generation. The goodwill from the acquisition further distorts asset-based ratios, making them unreliable for assessing TPL's true earning power.