Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 7.2x · EV/EBITDA 12.4x · ROE 20.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.3B | $2.2B | $3.0B | $2.2B | $2.5B | $3.1B | $3.1B | $2.8B | $3.0B | $4.1B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise Value | $7.6B | $7.4B | $8.4B | $7.9B | $7.9B | $8.1B | $7.9B | $7.5B | $6.9B | $6.6B | $5.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 7.21 | 8.67 | 21.40 | 20.94 | 37.91 | 79.47 | — | 20.70 | 18.89 | 5.96 | 8.88 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.10 | 1.02 | 0.96 | 0.74 | 1.26 | 2.07 | 1.75 | 1.02 | 1.20 | 1.12 | 0.65 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.13 | 1.91 | 2.26 | 1.74 | 1.96 | 2.42 | 1.52 | 1.19 | 1.18 | 0.84 | 0.69 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 76.46 | — | — | — | 83.80 | 18.94 |
| P/OCF | 6.50 | 6.09 | 5.15 | 7.50 | — | 5.12 | 4.69 | 7.16 | 7.95 | 5.38 | 2.72 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.45 | 2.72 | 2.63 | 4.00 | 5.35 | 4.54 | 2.71 | 2.74 | 1.79 | 1.19 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.45 | 11.20 | 10.68 | 11.06 | 12.97 | 15.52 | 76.43 | 11.09 | 12.11 | 8.43 | 5.33 |
| EV / EBIT | 21.15 | 11.44 | 16.93 | 18.95 | 23.59 | 32.88 | — | 18.87 | 20.74 | 17.29 | 7.35 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 197.79 | — | — | — | 134.19 | 34.84 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 26.6% | 26.6% | 21.7% | 17.7% | 18.6% | 23.4% | 24.1% | 20.9% | 22.7% | 25.0% | 24.7% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 16.6% | 16.0% | 14.0% | 16.9% | 16.9% | -8.8% | 14.4% | 12.6% | 15.0% | 16.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 11.7% | 11.7% | 4.5% | 3.6% | 3.0% | 12.0% | -8.4% | 5.0% | 6.3% | 19.2% | 7.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 20.6% | 20.6% | 10.7% | 8.3% | 4.7% | 11.0% | -6.7% | 5.6% | 4.3% | 15.3% | 7.8% |
| ROA | 2.9% | 2.9% | 1.6% | 1.2% | 0.7% | 2.1% | -1.7% | 1.6% | 1.8% | 7.5% | 3.8% |
| ROIC | 4.1% | 4.1% | 5.4% | 4.6% | 3.9% | 2.9% | -1.7% | 4.4% | 3.4% | 5.8% | 8.2% |
| ROCE | 4.7% | 4.7% | 6.5% | 5.4% | 4.3% | 3.3% | -1.9% | 5.1% | 3.9% | 6.3% | 8.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 4.75 | 4.75 | 4.44 | 4.60 | 4.51 | 4.07 | 2.53 | 2.07 | 1.57 | 0.67 | 0.71 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 8.20 | 8.20 | 7.39 | 8.27 | 9.37 | 10.10 | 49.19 | 7.32 | 7.11 | 4.16 | 2.98 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 4.58 | 4.15 | 4.42 | 4.28 | 3.84 | 2.42 | 1.95 | 1.50 | 0.51 | 0.58 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 7.90 | 7.90 | 6.91 | 7.94 | 8.89 | 9.52 | 46.99 | 6.90 | 6.79 | 3.16 | 2.43 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 121.33 | — | — | — | 50.38 | 15.90 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.37 | 2.37 | 1.81 | 1.56 | 1.60 | 1.29 | -1.45 | 1.78 | 1.85 | 2.06 | 4.09 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.12 | 2.12 | 0.85 | 1.01 | 1.59 | 1.30 | 2.46 | 1.81 | 2.05 | 3.79 | 3.65 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 1.84 | 1.01 | 1.15 | 2.75 | 2.50 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.26 | 0.18 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.31 | 1.78 | 1.37 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.26 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.38 | 0.50 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.38 | 3.38 | 5.06 | 3.59 | 2.56 | 2.68 | 4.65 | 5.03 | 3.70 | 4.29 | 5.19 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 70.50 | 45.22 | 45.11 | 61.16 | 56.10 | 127.29 | 36.44 | 46.11 | 20.37 | 38.25 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.0% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 3.9% | 3.1% | 2.8% | 3.0% | 2.9% | 2.6% | 1.8% | 2.2% |
| Payout Ratio | 39.0% | 39.0% | 67.3% | 81.1% | 128.0% | 48.6% | — | 59.7% | 48.6% | 10.3% | 19.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 13.9% | 11.5% | 4.7% | 4.8% | 2.6% | 1.3% | — | 4.8% | 5.3% | 16.8% | 11.3% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 1.3% | — | — | — | 1.2% | 5.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.4% | 3.6% | 1.0% | 0.3% | 2.3% | 26.9% | 6.6% | 8.3% | 17.2% | 2.3% | 1.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.5% | 8.2% | 4.2% | 4.2% | 5.4% | 29.7% | 9.6% | 11.2% | 19.8% | 4.1% | 4.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $83M | $84M | $83M | $84M | $104M | $116M | $127M | $146M | $152M | $149M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TRN stock.
Trinity Industries, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 7.2x. The historical average is 15.0x. This places it at the 33th percentile of its historical range.
Trinity Industries, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 12.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.8x.
Trinity Industries, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 20.6%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 9.5%.
Based on historical data, Trinity Industries, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 7.2x. This is at the 33th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Trinity Industries, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 4.05% with a payout ratio of 39.0%.
Trinity Industries, Inc. has 26.6% gross margin and 16.6% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Trinity Industries, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 8.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage amid volatile earnings
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Low Multiples Reflect Earnings Skepticism
Based on reported figures, TRN trades at 9.65x trailing earnings and 8.16x forward EV/EBITDA, below the 13.08x forward P/E implied by consensus, a discount that appears to price in cyclical downside rather than a stable earnings base.
The gap between trailing P/E of 9.65x and forward P/E of 13.08x is unusual because it implies expected earnings contraction, consistent with the revenue decline visible across recent quarters. The 2.13x price-to-book ratio sits against a leveraged asset base, so the market appears to be discounting the equity value of railcar assets rather than paying for growth. Investors should monitor whether the forward multiple compresses further or whether recent net income spikes prove non-recurring, as either outcome would change how cheap these multiples actually are.
Gross Margin Cyclicality Undermines Earning Power
As reported in quarterly income statements, TRN's gross margin swung from 21.2% in 2024Q3 to 30.9% in 2025Q3 and then to 17.9% in 2026Q3, a range that signals unstable unit economics against a prior-year operating margin near 16 to 17 percent.
Operating margin has held in a relatively narrow band near 12 to 21 percent, which is more stable than gross margin and suggests cost absorption varies with volume. Net margin, however, has been erratic, reaching 30.5% in 2025Q4 while operating margin sat at 13.6%, a divergence that points to non-operating items driving reported profit. Operating margin is the more reliable gauge of earning power here, and it should be read with the caveat that its recent compression tracks the revenue decline.
Debt Service Comfort Eroding Quarter by Quarter
According to reported figures, TRN's debt-to-EBITDA ratio has held near 4.3x to 4.8x while interest coverage fell from roughly 5.2x in 2025Q4 to 1.46x in 2026Q3, a sharp deterioration in debt service comfort.
A debt-to-EBITDA ratio above 4x combined with interest coverage near 1.5x suggests limited cushion if operating income weakens further. The 4.7x D/E figure reflects heavy reliance on borrowed capital, though interest coverage fluctuations may partly reflect timing of earnings rather than a permanent shift. Refinancing risk cannot be assessed from the supplied data, and investors should monitor coverage trends and debt maturity disclosures closely.
Thin Quick Ratio Leaves Limited Stress Buffer
Based on TRN's reported quarterly balance sheets, the quick ratio ranged from 0.52 to 1.79 across ten quarters, with the latest reading at 1.15, indicating that short-term liquidity depends heavily on timing of receivables and obligations.
A quick ratio near 1.0 is adequate in isolation but offers little margin when current ratios swing between 0.85 and 3.72 over the same period. The wide dispersion suggests liquidity is sensitive to working capital timing rather than stable cash generation. Under a severe downturn, reliance on fleet and inventory conversion could compress the buffer, and this inference should be weighed against the disclosed cash balances.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthening Into Downturn
As reported in financial statements, TRN's cash conversion cycle stretched from 90 days in 2024Q3 to 149 days in 2025Q3 and 113 days in 2026Q3, with inventory days consistently above 100, a pattern that may indicate slower asset turnover during the downcycle.
Days inventory outstanding moving between 85 and 149 days points to slow conversion of manufactured railcars, while days payable outstanding in the 43 to 69 day range provides partial offset. The asset turnover ratio near 0.05 to 0.09 reflects an asset-heavy leasing model rather than a conventional manufacturer, so the cash conversion cycle should be read with that structure in mind. Working capital appears to absorb cash during downturns, which is consistent with the negative free cash flow in recent quarters.
Peer Discount May Overstate Undervaluation
Based on the supplied peer data, TRN's 4.3% ROE and 7.6% ROIC peer comparison with GBX shows that the apparent valuation discount may reflect the leverage and earnings volatility rather than mispricing, since TRN's 4.7x debt-to-equity sits far above GBX's 1.06x.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for a railcar leasing business is the trailing P/E, because lease-based earnings are heavily influenced by gains on asset sales and fleet timing, which can inflate or depress net income unrelated to recurring operations. Trailing P/E of 9.65x looks cheap against peers, but the 2025Q4 net margin of 30.5% versus 13.6% operating margin suggests non-operating items may be inflating reported earnings. A more reliable approach would be to assess price-to-operating-cash-flow or EV/EBITDA on normalized earnings, adjusting for gains on disposal, before concluding the stock is undervalued relative to peers.