Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.5x · EV/EBITDA 4.8x · ROE -8.5%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.9B | $256M | $914M | $1.9B | $2.7B | $5.6B | $4.6B | $6.8B | $6.5B | $11.0B | $12.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $6.1B | $55.4B | $63.1B | $65.1B | $65.2B | $11.0B | $107.4B | $110.9B | $96.4B | $94.5B | $92.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.43 | 1.08 | 3.19 | 3.57 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.87 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 1.20 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.14 |
| P/FCF | 5.29 | 0.03 | 0.04 | — | 0.05 | 1.36 | 0.39 | 1.12 | 0.87 | 1.67 | 2.07 |
| P/OCF | 2.22 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.44 | 0.35 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.94 | 1.01 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.15 | 1.52 | 1.09 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.80 | 2.50 | 3.03 | 2.68 | 2.54 | 0.40 | 3.87 | 2.92 | 2.40 | 2.88 | 2.75 |
| EV / EBIT | 21.15 | 8.52 | 226.06 | 97.56 | — | 0.95 | 19.27 | 5.78 | 4.44 | 4.70 | 5.53 |
| EV / FCF | — | 5.70 | 2.86 | — | 1.18 | 2.65 | 9.10 | 18.32 | 12.95 | 14.41 | 14.80 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 38.2% | 34.0% | 34.6% | 36.8% | 36.9% | 36.0% | 42.0% | 42.9% | 43.2% | 45.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 8.6% | 0.5% | 4.3% | 6.4% | 8.4% | 9.1% | 16.7% | 20.0% | 15.1% | 17.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | -15.6% | -15.6% | -13.3% | -12.7% | 65.2% | 8.2% | -1.8% | 4.5% | 5.9% | 4.8% | 3.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -8.5% | -8.5% | -6.7% | -6.0% | 60.1% | 13.1% | -1.3% | 4.4% | 5.9% | 4.7% | 3.8% |
| ROA | -3.8% | -3.8% | -3.2% | -3.0% | 28.5% | 4.2% | -0.4% | 1.6% | 2.0% | 1.5% | 1.3% |
| ROIC | 2.3% | 2.3% | 0.1% | 1.1% | 3.1% | 4.6% | 2.4% | 6.3% | 8.0% | 6.0% | 7.3% |
| ROCE | 2.4% | 2.4% | 0.1% | 1.2% | 3.2% | 5.2% | 2.7% | 6.8% | 8.2% | 5.7% | 6.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.97 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 1.40 | 1.50 | 1.25 | 1.16 | 1.23 | 1.34 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.13 | 4.13 | 5.20 | 3.94 | 4.43 | 0.24 | 4.76 | 3.46 | 3.04 | 3.73 | 3.78 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 1.14 | 1.17 | 0.99 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.84 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.48 | 2.48 | 2.98 | 2.60 | 2.44 | 0.19 | 3.71 | 2.74 | 2.24 | 2.55 | 2.37 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.67 | 2.81 | — | 1.13 | 1.29 | 8.72 | 17.21 | 12.08 | 12.73 | 12.73 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.04 | 0.09 | -0.35 | 1.27 | 0.53 | 35.49 | 2.24 | 2.17 | 1.97 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.12 | 2.12 | 2.49 | 1.78 | 2.37 | 1.26 | 1.58 | 1.61 | 1.47 | 1.71 | 1.67 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.11 | 2.11 | 2.48 | 1.74 | 2.33 | 1.22 | 1.54 | 1.58 | 1.45 | 1.69 | 1.64 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.73 | 0.94 | 1.49 | 0.46 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.91 | 0.92 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 5.15 | 0.26 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.31 |
| Inventory Turnover | 258.83 | 258.83 | 88.76 | 34.33 | 29.94 | 431.46 | 27.55 | 51.30 | 56.35 | 35.86 | 27.58 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 24.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 55.0% | 38.5% | 18.7% | — | 15.8% | 16.5% | 9.9% | 8.4% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | 2.4% | 17.4% | — | 23.0% | 17.8% | 24.0% | 29.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 69.9% | 93.0% | 31.3% | 28.0% |
| FCF Yield | 18.9% | 3801.1% | 2414.4% | — | 2013.9% | 73.7% | 256.9% | 89.5% | 115.2% | 59.8% | 48.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.2% | 100.0% | 55.9% | 77.9% | 82.4% | 19.5% | 11.0% | 22.0% | 71.1% | 47.2% | 13.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 25.2% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 38.2% | 11.0% | 37.7% | 87.7% | 57.1% | 21.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $88M | $544M | $560M | $601M | $602M | $557M | $576M | $514M | $588M | $620M |
Structural Revenue Erosion
According to current market data, TV trades at a P/B of 0.04 and a negative TTM P/E, suggesting that investors are heavily discounting the company's asset base due to persistent concerns regarding its long-term viability in the face of aggressive competitive fiber-to-the-home expansion.
The extremely low valuation multiples appear to reflect a market consensus that the company's core assets may be overvalued relative to their future cash-generating potential. Investors should monitor whether the current discount is a temporary reaction to recent earnings volatility or a permanent re-rating of the business model's terminal value.
Based on reported financial statements, the company's ROIC has hovered near zero, reaching only 0.7% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the capital deployed into network infrastructure is failing to generate returns that exceed the cost of capital, thereby destroying shareholder value over the observed period.
The inability to sustain a meaningful ROIC suggests that the company's heavy investment in cable and satellite infrastructure is not yielding the expected competitive advantage. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the current capital allocation strategy is fundamentally flawed or merely hampered by the ongoing transition from legacy satellite services.
As indicated by the reported figures, the cash conversion cycle has remained deeply negative, reaching -104 days in 2026Q1, which primarily reflects the company's ability to delay payments to suppliers rather than an inherent efficiency in its underlying operational processes or inventory management.
While a negative CCC is often viewed as a sign of strength, in this context, it appears to be a defensive measure to preserve liquidity amidst declining top-line revenue. Analysts should be cautious, as this reliance on extended payables may eventually limit the company's operational flexibility with key content providers.
Based on the provided quarterly data, the interest coverage ratio has fluctuated significantly, falling to 1.75 in 2026Q1, which highlights the increasing difficulty the company faces in servicing its debt obligations as operating margins remain compressed and revenue continues its multi-quarter contraction trend.
The volatility in interest coverage suggests that the company's debt load is becoming a significant burden on its financial health. Investors should monitor the company's ability to refinance upcoming maturities, as any tightening in credit conditions could exacerbate the existing liquidity risks identified in recent balance sheet disclosures.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to this business model because it fails to account for the significant non-cash equity-method adjustments related to the TelevisaUnivision stake, which frequently distort net income and render traditional earnings-based valuation metrics largely irrelevant for assessing core operational performance.
Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or P/FCF to better capture the cash-generating capacity of the underlying telecom operations. Relying on P/E in this instance obscures the true operational reality and may lead to erroneous conclusions regarding the company's actual profitability and valuation relative to its peers.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TV stock.
Grupo Televisa, S.A.B.'s current P/E ratio is -2.5x. The historical average is 2.1x.
Grupo Televisa, S.A.B.'s current EV/EBITDA is 4.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 2.5x.
Grupo Televisa, S.A.B.'s return on equity (ROE) is -8.5%. The historical average is 11.2%.
Based on historical data, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. is trading at a P/E of -2.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Grupo Televisa, S.A.B.'s current dividend yield is 24.02%.
Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. has 38.2% gross margin and 8.6% operating margin.
Grupo Televisa, S.A.B.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.