Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -19.3x · EV/EBITDA 33.1x · ROE -21.1%. (2002–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.5B | $1.2B | $1.7B | $1.5B | $1.5B | $2.5B | $1.3B | $927M | $330M | $792M | $322M |
| Enterprise Value | $4.0B | $1.7B | $2.0B | $1.9B | $1.8B | $2.7B | $1.4B | $1.1B | $527M | $776M | $337M |
| P/E Ratio → | -19.32 | — | 70.25 | — | 37.67 | 21.32 | 16.48 | — | 9.01 | 10.54 | 32.33 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.69 | 0.57 | 0.79 | 0.88 | 0.64 | 1.21 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.30 | 0.86 | 0.57 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.47 | 1.50 | 1.77 | 1.70 | 1.62 | 2.85 | 2.32 | 2.05 | 0.73 | 2.64 | 1.49 |
| P/FCF | 226.46 | 77.10 | 1103.21 | 25.39 | — | 16.72 | 21.04 | 9.79 | 20.74 | 24.18 | 31.22 |
| P/OCF | 52.82 | 17.98 | 25.46 | 11.23 | 32.10 | 12.04 | 13.16 | 7.66 | 7.26 | 16.20 | 18.29 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.82 | 0.95 | 1.07 | 0.74 | 1.29 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 0.48 | 0.84 | 0.60 |
| EV / EBITDA | 33.11 | 14.02 | 11.96 | 19.18 | 9.36 | 10.73 | 8.38 | 15.37 | 6.44 | 7.75 | 9.87 |
| EV / EBIT | 90.69 | — | 17.60 | 49.57 | 14.46 | 15.21 | 11.46 | 39.38 | 8.68 | 8.68 | 15.04 |
| EV / FCF | — | 109.68 | 1334.14 | 30.93 | — | 17.83 | 22.87 | 11.61 | 33.14 | 23.69 | 32.71 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 15.7% | 15.7% | 17.0% | 16.0% | 19.6% | 20.5% | 20.9% | 18.5% | 16.0% | 18.1% | 15.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 2.1% | 4.3% | 2.0% | 5.1% | 8.8% | 8.7% | 2.8% | 5.5% | 9.7% | 4.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -8.8% | -8.8% | 1.1% | -1.8% | 1.7% | 5.7% | 5.5% | -0.9% | 3.3% | 8.1% | 1.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -21.1% | -21.1% | 2.6% | -3.4% | 4.4% | 16.6% | 15.5% | -2.1% | 9.7% | 29.1% | 4.8% |
| ROA | -9.9% | -9.9% | 1.3% | -1.6% | 2.0% | 7.6% | 7.3% | -0.9% | 4.8% | 16.0% | 2.8% |
| ROIC | 2.6% | 2.6% | 5.4% | 2.2% | 8.0% | 16.2% | 14.1% | 3.5% | 9.8% | 26.0% | 7.3% |
| ROCE | 2.9% | 2.9% | 5.8% | 2.2% | 7.7% | 15.1% | 14.2% | 3.7% | 10.3% | 28.1% | 8.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.03 | 1.03 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.17 | 0.31 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 6.77 | 6.77 | 3.95 | 6.60 | 3.24 | 2.51 | 1.88 | 4.67 | 4.17 | 0.52 | 1.99 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.64 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.27 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 0.44 | -0.05 | 0.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.16 | 4.16 | 2.07 | 3.44 | 1.34 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 2.40 | 2.41 | -0.16 | 0.45 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 32.58 | 230.93 | 5.54 | — | 1.11 | 1.83 | 1.81 | 12.40 | -0.49 | 1.48 |
| Interest Coverage | -2.80 | -2.80 | 2.45 | 0.77 | 3.60 | 7.38 | 7.20 | 1.09 | 6.07 | 40.64 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.19 | 3.19 | 2.89 | 2.88 | 2.82 | 2.42 | 2.71 | 2.22 | 3.23 | 1.99 | 2.35 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.89 | 1.89 | 1.76 | 1.67 | 1.68 | 1.62 | 1.81 | 1.40 | 1.92 | 0.84 | 1.32 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.04 | 1.04 | 0.94 | 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 1.01 | 0.34 | 0.52 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.19 | 1.09 | 0.93 | 1.21 | 1.04 | 1.27 | 1.05 | 1.14 | 1.66 | 1.48 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.43 | 4.43 | 4.57 | 3.89 | 4.30 | 4.41 | 6.14 | 5.04 | 4.95 | 3.26 | 4.58 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 37.10 | 41.95 | 38.05 | 39.00 | 43.44 | 37.97 | 38.58 | 35.62 | 35.62 | 48.43 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | 0.1% | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 2.1% | — | 0.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 1.4% | — | 2.7% | 4.7% | 6.1% | — | 11.1% | 9.5% | 3.1% |
| FCF Yield | 0.4% | 1.3% | 0.1% | 3.9% | — | 6.0% | 4.8% | 10.2% | 4.8% | 4.1% | 3.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $45M | $45M | $45M | $46M | $44M | $41M | $40M | $39M | $34M | $33M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 24 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying UCTT stock.
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -19.3x. The historical average is 24.6x.
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 33.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.5x.
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -21.1%. The historical average is 3.3%.
Based on historical data, Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -19.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.00%.
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. has 15.7% gross margin and 2.1% operating margin.
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 6.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Customer concentration and thin margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Thin Margins Mask Operating Leverage
Gross margin hovered near 16% in 2026Q2, per the latest financial statements, while operating margin rebounded to 4.6% from a -27.3% trough in 2025Q2, suggesting significant operating leverage on the revenue surge.
The 16.1% gross margin remains structurally low, reflecting the company's role as an integrator rather than a proprietary component maker. The swing in operating margin from -27.3% to 4.6% within four quarters underscores extreme sensitivity to volume, as fixed manufacturing overhead is absorbed only at higher revenue levels. Net margin turned positive at 1.3% in 2026Q2, but the prior quarter's -3.4% and the 2025Q2's -31.2% highlight the volatility from non-operating items, likely including impairment charges. Investors should monitor whether the recent operating leverage can persist as revenue growth normalizes.
Returns Recovering from Depressed Levels
ROIC improved to 1.8% in 2026Q2 from 0.7% in the prior quarter, as reported in the financial data, but remains far below the cost of capital, indicating the company is still rebuilding earning power after a period of negative returns.
The ten-quarter trend shows ROIC oscillating between 0.7% and 1.8% since 2024Q1, with a severe dip to -9.0% in 2025Q2, likely due to a goodwill impairment that eroded equity. The recent improvement is driven by margin recovery rather than asset efficiency, as asset turnover has remained flat around 0.3x. ROE of 1.2% in 2026Q2 is positive but still negligible, and the negative ROE of -21.1% in 2025Q2 reflects the equity base reduction from impairments and buybacks. The company is not yet compounding returns; it is merely recovering from a trough, and sustained improvement will require either higher margins or better asset utilization.
Working Capital Drag Intensifies
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 77 days in 2026Q2, up from 72 days a year earlier, as reported in the financial statements, driven by a rise in days inventory outstanding to 93, indicating slower inventory turnover amid the revenue surge.
DIO increased from 86 days in 2024Q1 to 93 days in 2026Q2, suggesting that inventory is building faster than sales, which is concerning given the custom nature of the products and the risk of obsolescence. DSO improved to 31 days from 35 days, reflecting better receivables collection, while DPO rose to 47 days, indicating the company is taking longer to pay suppliers, which may strain relationships. The net effect is a CCC that has expanded by five days year-over-year, consuming cash at a time when operating cash flow is already negative. This working capital build is a key reason why free cash flow turned sharply negative in 2026Q2, and investors should monitor whether inventory levels normalize as demand stabilizes.
Debt Burden Grows Amid Thin Coverage
Debt-to-equity rose to 1.08 in 2026Q2 from 0.73 a year earlier, per the balance sheet data, while interest coverage improved to 28.27 from 1.98, but the improvement is fragile given the volatile operating income.
Total debt increased to $775.9M, and the D/E ratio now exceeds that of peers like Ichor (0.24) and Entegris (0.98), indicating a heavier reliance on debt financing. The interest coverage ratio of 28.27 in 2026Q2 is a dramatic improvement from 1.58 in 2026Q1, but this is driven by the spike in operating income; in 2025Q2, coverage was negative at -14.18. The D/EBITDA ratio of 24.95 remains elevated, suggesting that EBITDA is still low relative to debt, and any downturn could quickly erode coverage. The company's leverage appears to be funding growth, but the thin margins leave little room for error, and refinancing risk may emerge if earnings do not sustain.
Liquidity Buffer Adequate but Stretched
Current ratio stood at 2.73 in 2026Q2, unchanged from a year earlier, as reported in the balance sheet, but the quick ratio fell to 1.25 from 1.60, indicating a growing reliance on inventory to meet short-term obligations.
The current ratio of 2.73 appears healthy, but the quick ratio of 1.25 reveals that inventory constitutes a significant portion of current assets, and its liquidation value may be uncertain given the custom nature of the products. Cash and equivalents of $255.9M provide a buffer, but the negative free cash flow of -$57.3M in 2026Q2 suggests the company is consuming cash to fund working capital. Under a severe demand shock, the company could face liquidity pressure if inventory becomes difficult to sell and customers delay payments. The adequate but not fortress-like liquidity position warrants monitoring, especially given the high leverage and thin margins.
Valuation Discount Reflects Assembly Model
UCTT trades at a forward P/E of 27.57 and EV/EBITDA of 36.84, as per current market data, which is at a premium to Ichor's negative earnings but a discount to MKSI and ENTG on EV/EBITDA, reflecting its lower-margin profile.
Compared to peers, UCTT's EV/EBITDA of 36.84 is higher than Entegris's 20.35 and MKSI's 27.08, but this is distorted by UCTT's depressed EBITDA; on a forward basis, the multiple drops to 24.56, closer to the group. The P/B of 5.04 is above Ichor's 3.52 but below MKSI's 7.59 and ENTG's 5.85, suggesting the market assigns a moderate premium to its asset base. The negative trailing P/E of -21.81 reflects the recent losses, while the forward P/E of 27.57 implies the market expects a significant earnings recovery. The discount to component-heavy peers like MKSI and ENTG appears structural, given UCTT's lower gross margins and reliance on assembly, but the Services segment may justify a re-rating if it grows.
EV/EBITDA Misleads on Cyclical Recovery
The most commonly misapplied ratio for UCTT is EV/EBITDA, as the current 36.84 multiple, based on reported figures, is distorted by trough EBITDA and fails to capture the company's working capital intensity and cyclical earnings power.
EV/EBITDA is often used to compare semiconductor supply chain companies, but for UCTT, the metric is heavily influenced by the stage of the WFE cycle. In 2025Q2, EBITDA was negative, making the multiple meaningless, while in 2026Q2 it appears elevated due to depressed earnings. A more appropriate measure is EV/EBIT or EV/Revenue, which better reflects the company's operating leverage and the impact of depreciation and amortization from past acquisitions. Additionally, investors should adjust for working capital swings, as the cash conversion cycle is a major driver of cash flow. Using a normalized mid-cycle EBITDA would provide a more accurate valuation, but the current data suggests the market is pricing in a strong recovery that may not materialize if margins remain thin.