Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 9.7x · EV/EBITDA 7.1x · ROE 19.1%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $994M | $2.8B | $2.3B | $2.0B | $1.4B | $4.3B | $4.1B | $1.2B | $1.9B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.1B | $2.8B | $2.4B | $2.3B | $1.8B | $4.7B | $4.0B | $1.2B | $1.8B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 9.70 | 23.88 | 10.76 | 43.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.26 | 3.51 | 3.04 | 2.96 | 2.20 | 8.64 | 10.97 | 3.90 | 7.41 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.78 | 4.38 | 4.07 | 5.36 | 5.47 | 16.74 | 13.69 | 4.52 | 7.71 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 4.10 | 11.40 | 16.82 | 56.14 | 492.98 | 924.43 | 512.18 | — | 272.11 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 4.01 | 11.13 | 15.24 | 38.72 | 118.52 | 400.88 | 183.21 | 1107.49 | 136.67 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.61 | 3.12 | 3.38 | 2.94 | 9.43 | 10.81 | 3.88 | 7.00 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.10 | 18.75 | 29.01 | 1597.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 8.33 | 20.19 | 25.81 | 47.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 11.74 | 17.28 | 64.07 | 656.72 | 1008.95 | 504.79 | — | 256.87 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 77.8% | 77.8% | 77.4% | 75.3% | 74.1% | 73.0% | 72.1% | 70.7% | 67.8% | 67.7% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 16.4% | 16.4% | 8.5% | -1.6% | -15.0% | -10.8% | -6.0% | -6.2% | -4.6% | -1.5% | -8.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 14.7% | 14.7% | 28.0% | 6.8% | -14.5% | -11.2% | -6.1% | -5.5% | -7.9% | -2.0% | -9.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 19.1% | 19.1% | 45.1% | 14.9% | -35.4% | -20.1% | -8.2% | -6.6% | -18.7% | — | — |
| ROA | 9.2% | 9.2% | 19.2% | 4.4% | -8.3% | -7.0% | -4.7% | -4.0% | -6.0% | -1.6% | -6.5% |
| ROIC | 14.3% | 14.3% | 7.5% | -1.2% | -10.2% | -9.1% | -6.8% | -7.2% | -14.7% | — | — |
| ROCE | 16.2% | 16.2% | 7.7% | -1.4% | -11.0% | -9.2% | -7.1% | -6.7% | -5.5% | -1.9% | -8.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.97 | 2.34 | 2.25 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.10 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.51 | 2.51 | 4.45 | 252.31 | — | — | — | — | — | 31.83 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.76 | 1.82 | 1.53 | -0.20 | -0.02 | -0.43 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.76 | 197.68 | — | — | — | — | — | 11.51 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.34 | 0.46 | 7.93 | 163.73 | 84.52 | -7.39 | — | -15.24 | — | -4.50 |
| Interest Coverage | 201.40 | 201.40 | 34.49 | — | -18.93 | -24.74 | -28.20 | -11.73 | -8.76 | -3.32 | -17.92 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.46 | 1.46 | 3.39 | 3.01 | 3.76 | 3.98 | 1.82 | 1.88 | 2.01 | 1.26 | 1.37 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.46 | 1.46 | 3.39 | 3.01 | 3.76 | 3.98 | 1.82 | 1.88 | 2.01 | 1.26 | 1.37 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.04 | 1.04 | 2.32 | 1.88 | 2.77 | 2.93 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 1.01 | 0.19 | 0.32 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.47 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.66 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 35.32 | 35.82 | 54.59 | 38.30 | 48.51 | 45.93 | 36.62 | 32.15 | 55.43 | 56.20 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 10.3% | 4.2% | 9.3% | 2.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 24.4% | 8.8% | 5.9% | 1.8% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.2% | — | 0.4% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 13.7% | 4.9% | 4.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 13.7% | 4.9% | 4.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $139M | $143M | $137M | $131M | $127M | $119M | $110M | $104M | $96M | $32M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying UPWK stock.
Upwork Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 9.7x. The historical average is 26.1x.
Upwork Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 7.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 23.9x.
Upwork Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 19.1%. The historical average is -1.2%.
Based on historical data, Upwork Inc. is trading at a P/E of 9.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Upwork Inc. has 77.8% gross margin and 16.4% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Upwork Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
AI-driven demand displacement
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Deep Value or Structural Trap
UPWK trades at 11.8x trailing earnings and 6.4x forward earnings, per reported multiples, implying the market expects significant margin expansion or a growth re-acceleration that recent trends do not support.
The forward P/E of 6.37 is dramatically below the trailing 11.84, suggesting the market is pricing in a sharp earnings rebound. However, with revenue growth at only 2.4% TTM and operating margin already at 16.4%, the implied earnings growth may be overly optimistic unless AI-driven cost savings materialize. Compared to Fiverr's 16.2x P/E, UPWK's discount appears to reflect skepticism about its ability to sustain profitability amid structural headwinds.
Margin Stability Masks Mix Shifts
Gross margin held at 76.4% in Q2 2026, down from 78.3% in Q1 2025, while operating margin contracted to 14.7% from 20.1%, per reported figures, indicating cost pressures and a shift toward lower-margin services.
The 200 basis point decline in gross margin over five quarters suggests a mix shift toward Managed Services or increased payment processing costs. Operating margin volatility—peaking at 20.1% in Q1 2025 and falling to 14.7% by Q2 2026—reflects rising SG&A, which increased to $71.8M, likely from enterprise sales investment. Net margin of 13.3% in Q2 2026 is respectable but below the 19.6% peak, and the Q4 2024 net margin of 76.9% was distorted by a one-time tax benefit, underscoring the need to focus on operating margin as the true earnings power.
ROIC Stalls Below Cost of Capital
ROIC has hovered between 1.4% and 4.5% over the past ten quarters, per reported data, well below the company's cost of capital, suggesting value destruction despite improving profitability.
Despite a shift to GAAP profitability, ROIC remains in the low single digits, with Q2 2026 at 3.7%. This is partly due to a large cash balance ($476M) and goodwill ($149M) that inflate invested capital. ROE improved to 4.3% in Q2 2026 from 5.1% in Q1 2024, but the 2024Q4 spike to 29.8% was driven by the tax benefit. The company is not compounding returns on capital; rather, it is generating modest returns on a growing capital base, which may indicate that the marketplace model requires heavy ongoing investment in sales and marketing to sustain even low growth.
Working Capital Leverage Distorts Cash Flow
DPO swung from 5 days in Q2 2025 to 212 days in Q2 2026, per reported figures, while DSO remained stable near 35 days, indicating the company is using supplier payment terms to manage cash flow.
The dramatic increase in DPO suggests UPWK is stretching payables to freelancers, which boosts operating cash flow in the short term but may strain supplier relationships. The cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to missing DIO, but the DPO trend alone explains the volatility in operating cash flow, which ranged from $2.4M to $44.8M in FCF margin terms. Asset turnover is extremely low at 0.15x, reflecting the asset-light model but also the large cash and intangible balances that depress the ratio. Investors should monitor whether the extended DPO is sustainable or a one-time working capital benefit.
Leverage Elevated but Manageable
D/E improved to 0.61 in Q2 2026 from 1.05 in Q1 2024, while D/EBITDA rose to 10.27 from 8.47 a year earlier, per reported data, indicating rising debt relative to cash flow.
Although total debt remained flat near $375M, EBITDA has declined, pushing D/EBITDA to over 10x, which is high for a services company. Interest coverage remains comfortable at 40.2x, but the trend is downward from 64.3x in Q1 2025. The company's cash balance of $476M exceeds total debt, providing a net cash position, but the rising D/EBITDA suggests that cash flow generation is not keeping pace with debt levels. If EBITDA continues to contract due to AI displacement, leverage could become a concern, though current interest coverage provides ample cushion.
Liquidity Normalizes from Peak
Current ratio fell to 1.42 in Q2 2026 from 3.41 in Q1 2025, per reported data, as cash was deployed into buybacks and working capital, but the company still holds $476M in cash.
The sharp decline in the current ratio reflects a deliberate shift from a cash-hoarding stance to a more efficient balance sheet, with the $107.9M buyback in Q1 2026 reducing cash. Quick ratio equals current ratio at 1.42, indicating no inventory dependence, which is typical for a services platform. Under severe stress, the cash buffer provides a cushion, but the rapid drawdown in liquidity—from 3.41 to 1.42 in five quarters—warrants monitoring. If operating cash flow deteriorates further, the company may need to rely on debt or reduce buybacks, but current liquidity remains adequate.
Cheap vs. Peers, but for a Reason
UPWK's P/E of 11.8x is below Fiverr's 16.2x and TaskUs's 6.45x, while its ROIC of 3.7% lags TaskUs's 16.3%, per reported data, suggesting the market is pricing in structural risks.
UPWK trades at a discount to Fiverr on P/E and EV/EBITDA (8.55x vs. 15.03x), but its ROIC is far below TaskUs's 16.3%, indicating that the market is skeptical of UPWK's ability to generate returns on its capital base. The low P/B of 2.17 vs. Fiverr's 0.82 suggests UPWK is not as asset-heavy, but the high D/E of 0.61 vs. Fiverr's 0.01 highlights a more leveraged balance sheet. The valuation gap may be justified by UPWK's slower growth and AI exposure, but if the company can stabilize growth and maintain margins, the discount could narrow.
Misapplied P/E on Cyclical Earnings
The trailing P/E of 11.8x is misleading because Q4 2024 net income was inflated by a one-time tax benefit, per reported data, making the current earnings power appear stronger than it is.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for UPWK is the P/E, as its earnings are volatile and subject to non-operating items. The Q4 2024 net margin of 76.9% was driven by a tax benefit, and the Q2 2026 EPS miss of $0.20 vs. $0.34 consensus shows that quarterly earnings are unpredictable. Instead of P/E, investors should use EV/EBITDA or P/FCF, which better capture the underlying cash generation. The forward P/E of 6.37 assumes a massive earnings rebound that may not materialize if AI continues to erode demand. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 8.55x is still low but reflects the company's debt-adjusted value.