Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -85.3x · EV/EBITDA 14.3x · ROE -1.0%. (2013–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $14.7B | $5.5B | $4.6B | $2.3B | $2.4B | $1.5B | $787M | $1.5B | $1.9B | $2.4B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $16.9B | $7.7B | $5.7B | $3.4B | $3.0B | $2.2B | $1.3B | $2.1B | $2.3B | $2.5B | $1.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | -85.27 | — | 12.85 | 11.67 | 15.89 | 25.07 | — | 32.88 | 12.96 | 21.80 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 10.95 | 4.09 | 5.36 | 2.82 | 2.78 | 2.89 | 3.15 | 5.11 | 6.46 | 14.16 | 16.80 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.56 | 0.53 | 1.18 | 0.81 | 1.04 | 0.65 | 0.42 | 0.71 | 1.51 | 2.66 | 2.43 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | 3.78 | 56.19 | 6.01 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 13.99 | 5.23 | 7.44 | 3.65 | 3.44 | 4.75 | 4.00 | 6.44 | 7.63 | 17.49 | 19.37 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.71 | 6.59 | 4.09 | 3.42 | 4.35 | 5.30 | 7.07 | 7.81 | 14.56 | 18.20 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.26 | 6.47 | 7.26 | 4.42 | 3.70 | 4.72 | 8.62 | 7.75 | 8.61 | 16.23 | 70.24 |
| EV / EBIT | 29.20 | — | 9.81 | 5.69 | 4.48 | 7.51 | — | 10.50 | 11.10 | 22.00 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | 4.66 | 84.61 | 10.11 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 47.9% | 47.9% | 68.0% | 76.2% | 79.5% | 73.1% | 51.8% | 67.4% | 73.0% | 70.3% | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | 43.0% | 43.0% | 65.9% | 75.0% | 78.6% | 71.7% | 21.2% | 65.0% | 70.3% | 66.2% | -11.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -5.1% | -5.1% | 41.8% | 24.2% | 17.5% | 11.5% | -77.1% | 15.5% | 49.9% | 64.8% | -13.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -1.0% | -1.0% | 10.6% | 7.7% | 6.7% | 2.8% | -9.6% | 2.7% | 13.4% | 15.3% | -2.1% |
| ROA | -0.8% | -0.8% | 7.9% | 5.8% | 5.1% | 2.1% | -7.3% | 2.1% | 10.8% | 13.2% | -1.8% |
| ROIC | 5.0% | 5.0% | 9.6% | 13.7% | 17.4% | 10.1% | 1.5% | 6.6% | 11.7% | 10.4% | -1.2% |
| ROCE | 6.6% | 6.6% | 12.6% | 18.1% | 23.0% | 13.3% | 2.0% | 8.8% | 15.3% | 13.6% | -1.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.38 | 0.25 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 0.27 | 0.33 | 0.10 | 0.22 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.84 | 1.84 | 1.39 | 1.41 | 0.72 | 1.67 | 3.62 | 2.16 | 1.57 | 0.61 | 5.88 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.24 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.31 | 0.08 | 0.20 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.83 | 1.83 | 1.35 | 1.38 | 0.70 | 1.59 | 3.50 | 2.15 | 1.48 | 0.45 | 5.43 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | 0.88 | 28.42 | 4.10 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -1.34 | -1.34 | 7.82 | 12.55 | 16.56 | 8.58 | -0.54 | 9.52 | 14.66 | 35.97 | -3.44 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.72 | 3.72 | 4.89 | 4.32 | 5.41 | 4.54 | 1.20 | 5.41 | 10.83 | 9.85 | 10.88 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.72 | 3.72 | 4.89 | 4.32 | 5.41 | 4.54 | 1.20 | 5.41 | 10.83 | 9.85 | 10.88 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.55 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 1.61 | 0.43 | 0.27 | 3.77 | 4.30 | 4.28 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.30 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.12 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 94.91 | 77.45 | 49.81 | 37.37 | 51.18 | 50.03 | 84.12 | 53.50 | 65.55 | 62.32 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.6% | 6.0% | 4.8% | 14.0% | 17.3% | 12.1% | 13.7% | 15.8% | 13.6% | 5.4% | 4.9% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 61.1% | 162.3% | 274.9% | 304.8% | — | 519.2% | 176.1% | 117.4% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 7.8% | 8.6% | 6.3% | 4.0% | — | 3.0% | 7.7% | 4.6% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | 26.4% | 1.8% | 16.6% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.3% | 3.5% | 0.0% | 4.1% | 6.3% | 3.2% | 3.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.9% | 9.5% | 4.8% | 18.0% | 23.6% | 15.3% | 16.8% | 15.8% | 13.6% | 5.4% | 4.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $143M | $94M | $74M | $76M | $68M | $68M | $62M | $72M | $104M | $83M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 13 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying VNOM stock.
Viper Energy, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -85.3x. The historical average is 26.7x.
Viper Energy, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 14.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.8x.
Viper Energy, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -1.0%. The historical average is 5.0%.
Based on historical data, Viper Energy, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -85.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Viper Energy, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 5.62%.
Viper Energy, Inc. has 47.9% gross margin and 43.0% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Viper Energy, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.8x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Negative net margin persistence
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Resilience Amidst Acquisition Spree
Gross margin averaged 63.8% in 2026Q2, down from 70.4% in 2024Q2, yet operating margin remains robust at 62.2%, per reported figures, indicating stable core profitability despite expansion.
The decline in gross margin from 70.4% to 63.8% over eight quarters likely reflects acquisition-related costs or a shift in asset mix, but the operating margin of 62.2% in 2026Q2 remains exceptionally high, underscoring the royalty model's low variable costs. Net margin volatility, swinging from -24.4% in 2025Q4 to 21.6% in 2026Q2, appears driven by non-cash items rather than operational deterioration, as operating cash flow consistently exceeds net income. Investors should focus on operating margin as the truest measure of earning power, given the noise in bottom-line figures.
ROIC Recovery Masks Acquisition Dilution
ROIC improved to 2.6% in 2026Q2 from 0.8% in 2025Q4, per financial statements, but remains below the 2.9% peak in 2024Q2, suggesting that aggressive acquisitions have temporarily diluted returns on invested capital.
The rebound in ROIC from 0.8% to 2.6% indicates that recent acquisitions are beginning to contribute, yet the metric remains below the 2.9% level seen in 2024Q2, implying that the capital deployed in inorganic growth has not yet achieved full productivity. ROE similarly recovered to 1.4% in 2026Q2 from -1.0% in 2025Q4, but the low absolute levels reflect the asset-heavy nature of mineral royalties, where depreciation and depletion charges depress accounting returns. The trend suggests that while the company is compounding its asset base, the return on that capital is still in the early stages of normalization, and investors should monitor whether ROIC can exceed pre-acquisition levels as the new acreage matures.
Working Capital Efficiency Hides in Royalty Model
Asset turnover remains low at 0.05x in 2026Q2, per reported data, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of mineral acquisitions, while DSO of 61 days indicates a stable collection cycle despite revenue growth of 129%.
The asset turnover of 0.05x is characteristic of a royalty company, where the bulk of assets are mineral interests that generate revenue over decades, making this metric less meaningful for operational efficiency. DSO has improved from 91 days in 2025Q3 to 61 days in 2026Q2, suggesting that the company is collecting royalty payments more promptly, possibly due to improved operator reporting or a shift in revenue mix. The absence of inventory and payables data is consistent with a royalty model that has no production costs, so the cash conversion cycle is effectively driven by the timing of royalty receipts, which appear to be stabilizing.
Deleveraging Continues Despite Debt Build
Debt-to-equity fell to 0.16 in 2026Q2 from 0.38 in 2024Q1, as reported, while interest coverage improved to 17.04x, indicating a strengthening balance sheet even as total debt rose to $1.7B.
The improvement in debt-to-equity from 0.38 to 0.16, despite a rise in absolute debt, reflects a substantial equity raise and retained cash flows, positioning the balance sheet as a fortress. Interest coverage of 17.04x in 2026Q2, up from 6.60x in 2024Q1, suggests that debt service is highly comfortable, with operating income more than sufficient to cover interest expenses. The negative interest coverage in 2025Q4 and 2025Q3 was driven by non-cash losses, not operational distress, as operating cash flow remained positive, so the leverage trend appears sustainable.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens with Cash Reserves
Current ratio improved to 6.37 in 2026Q2 from 3.46 in 2024Q1, per balance sheet data, indicating ample short-term liquidity, though cash of $77M remains modest relative to $1.7B in debt.
The current ratio of 6.37 suggests that current assets, primarily cash and receivables, comfortably cover current liabilities, providing a strong buffer against short-term disruptions. However, the absolute cash balance of $77M is small relative to the debt load, implying that the company relies on operating cash flow for liquidity rather than a large cash cushion. Given the royalty model's predictable cash flows and low debt service requirements, the liquidity position appears adequate, but investors should monitor the pace of acquisitions, which could quickly consume available cash.
P/E Misleads in Royalty Business Model
The trailing P/E of -94.31 is meaningless for VNOM due to non-cash charges, as reported, while forward P/E of 17.36 and EV/EBITDA of 15.57 better reflect the company's cash-generating ability.
The negative trailing P/E is a result of non-cash impairments and mark-to-market losses, which obscure the company's true earning power, making the metric inappropriate for valuation. Instead, EV/EBITDA of 15.57 and forward P/E of 17.36 provide a clearer picture, though they still trade at a premium to peers like BSM (EV/EBITDA 11.00) and DMLP (10.83), reflecting the 'Diamondback Premium' for drilling certainty. Investors should use price-to-cash-flow or EV/EBITDA rather than P/E when assessing VNOM, as the royalty model generates substantial cash flow that is not captured by net income.