Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 8.8x · EV/EBITDA 1.3x · ROE 49.0%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $333M | $3.6B | $4.1B | $3.7B | $2.2B | $2.5B | $2.2B | $2.2B | $852M | $479M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $306M | $3.6B | $5.0B | $4.6B | $3.3B | $3.7B | $2.9B | $3.0B | $1.7B | $906M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 8.81 | 26.36 | 127.26 | 63.97 | 23.84 | 61.72 | — | 66.62 | — | 335.81 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.33 | 3.69 | 4.61 | 4.51 | 2.97 | 4.59 | 5.51 | 4.99 | 2.30 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.21 | 12.34 | 15.30 | 8.74 | 9.52 | 9.72 | 6.87 | 7.23 | 2.82 | 95.72 | — |
| P/FCF | 2.42 | 26.44 | 26.54 | 24.80 | 12.93 | 15.03 | 95.77 | 21.51 | 43.84 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 1.30 | 14.13 | 18.13 | 17.88 | 10.07 | 13.08 | 46.24 | 16.74 | 18.52 | 197.05 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.66 | 5.74 | 5.66 | 4.51 | 6.74 | 7.42 | 6.70 | 4.48 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 1.27 | 10.18 | 20.63 | 15.31 | 11.03 | 16.23 | 18.93 | 14.19 | 14.29 | 20.17 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 1.28 | 13.82 | 32.97 | 26.62 | 17.03 | 32.88 | 70.04 | 29.38 | 908.20 | 76.91 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 26.24 | 33.02 | 31.11 | 19.66 | 22.06 | 129.01 | 28.89 | 85.21 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 96.9% | 96.9% | 97.8% | 94.7% | 93.6% | 93.6% | 91.5% | 67.7% | 97.5% | 6711.0% | 58.4% |
| Operating Margin | 24.4% | 24.4% | 15.5% | 23.1% | 22.2% | 20.3% | 9.6% | 21.5% | 3.4% | 100.0% | 20.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 14.0% | 14.0% | 3.6% | 7.0% | 12.5% | 7.5% | -1.2% | 3.8% | -15.8% | -182.6% | 12.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 49.0% | 49.0% | 9.2% | 17.5% | 37.7% | 14.4% | -1.5% | 5.6% | -38.0% | 57.2% | — |
| ROA | 8.4% | 8.4% | 1.8% | 3.2% | 5.1% | 2.6% | -0.3% | 1.2% | -6.7% | 0.7% | 6933.1% |
| ROIC | 23.5% | 23.5% | 7.8% | 10.3% | 8.8% | 6.7% | 2.6% | 6.6% | 1.2% | -0.3% | 27449.7% |
| ROCE | 16.7% | 16.7% | 9.1% | 12.0% | 10.2% | 7.5% | 2.9% | 7.5% | 1.5% | -0.4% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.13 | 0.13 | 4.02 | 2.55 | 5.42 | 4.94 | 2.77 | 2.91 | 2.88 | 85.74 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.11 | 0.11 | 4.36 | 3.56 | 4.13 | 5.62 | 5.66 | 4.24 | 7.50 | 9.54 | 0.00 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.09 | 3.73 | 2.23 | 4.96 | 4.55 | 2.39 | 2.48 | 2.66 | 85.57 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.08 | -0.08 | 4.05 | 3.11 | 3.78 | 5.18 | 4.88 | 3.62 | 6.94 | 9.52 | 0.00 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.20 | 6.48 | 6.31 | 6.74 | 7.04 | 33.24 | 7.38 | 41.37 | — | 0.01 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.02 | 4.02 | 2.07 | 2.00 | 2.83 | 2.51 | 1.02 | 1.69 | 0.03 | 3.91 | 18.61 |
Net cash position: cash ($65M) exceeds total debt ($38M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.09 | 2.09 | 1.97 | 2.05 | 1.94 | 1.99 | 5.12 | 2.60 | 2.69 | 4.85 | 0.96 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.89 | 1.96 | 1.84 | 1.92 | 5.12 | 2.60 | 2.66 | 4.85 | 0.96 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 1.88 | 1.25 | 0.95 | 4.17 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.28 | -0.00 | 551.73 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.47 | 1.47 | 1.22 | 2.42 | 2.45 | 2.91 | 296.81 | — | 4.54 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 113.84 | 108.55 | 104.90 | 97.33 | 128.24 | 169.55 | 92.33 | 99.07 | -30397.62 | 0.00 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 91.4% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 162.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 11.4% | 3.8% | 0.8% | 1.6% | 4.2% | 1.6% | — | 1.5% | — | 0.3% | — |
| FCF Yield | 41.3% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 4.0% | 7.7% | 6.7% | 1.0% | 4.6% | 2.3% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 40.1% | 3.7% | 4.9% | 2.7% | 5.7% | 4.0% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 91.4% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 40.1% | 3.7% | 4.9% | 2.7% | 5.7% | 4.0% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $161M | $168M | $160M | $159M | $164M | $162M | $160M | $87M | $48M | $40M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying VRRM stock.
Verra Mobility Corporation's current P/E ratio is 8.8x. The historical average is 61.6x.
Verra Mobility Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 1.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.7x.
Verra Mobility Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 49.0%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 16.8%.
Based on historical data, Verra Mobility Corporation is trading at a P/E of 8.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Verra Mobility Corporation has 96.9% gross margin and 24.4% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Verra Mobility Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.1x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage swings and goodwill sensitivity
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Deep Discount Pricing Signals Skepticism
Based on reported figures, VRRM trades at 2.58x trailing earnings, 0.86x EV/EBITDA, and 0.34x sales, multiples that sit far below typical technology services peers and may indicate the market doubts the durability of current earnings.
The low P/E and EV/EBITDA multiples relative to the 2.43x P/FCF suggest the market is discounting reported earnings more heavily than cash generation, which aligns with the prior finding that operating cash flow frequently exceeds net income. The gap between forward and trailing P/E, at 1.92x versus 2.58x, implies the market expects near-term earnings to be meaningfully higher, though that expectation would need to be validated against the flat revenue trajectory. Investors should monitor whether these multiples reflect a genuine mispricing or a rational response to goodwill exposure and volatile quarterly results.
Structurally High Margins Obscured by Volatility
As reported, VRRM's gross margin held between 87% and 97% in most quarters, while operating margin in normal periods reached 23% to 29%, yet discrete loss quarters pushed operating margin to -19.6% and -12.4%.
The high gross margin profile points to a largely fixed cost structure, so incremental revenue should flow through efficiently, but the sharp drawdowns in 2024Q4 and 2026Q2 indicate that non-recurring or timing-driven charges dominate reported profitability. Operating margin is therefore a better reflection of run-rate earning power than net margin, which swings more violently with discrete items. The implication is that normalized earning power may sit closer to the upper end of the observed range, but this conclusion depends on the composition of those loss quarters, which the data does not disclose.
Returns Recovering From Depressed Base
According to reported ratios, ROIC has fluctuated between roughly 3% and 14% over ten quarters, with the latest quarter at 6.8%, below the 13.8% peak in 2026Q1 but well above the 2024-2025 trough near 3%.
The return profile appears to be recovering from a low base, but the quarterly volatility makes it difficult to establish a stable compounding trend. ROE readings are distorted by the small equity base of $264.8M, which is depressed by repurchases and an accumulated deficit, so ROE overstates return efficiency relative to ROIC. Investors should treat ROIC as the more reliable signal and monitor whether it sustains levels above 7% through full-year periods.
Debt Metrics Track Classification Timing
Based on reported figures, D/E swung from 0.13 to 4.86 and D/EBITDA ranged from 0.53x to 12.51x, with interest coverage between 3.19x and 4.94x in most quarters, suggesting debt service capacity is adequate on average.
The extreme D/E readings appear linked to current versus non-current debt reclassification around refinancing events rather than a steady deleveraging or releveraging path, which makes trend analysis unreliable on a single-quarter basis. Interest coverage remaining above 3x in most periods suggests debt service has been manageable based on reported operating income. Investors should monitor debt maturity schedules and refinancing terms, as the data does not provide covenant details or confirm the timing of maturities.
Current Ratio Adequate but Cash Thin
Based on reported financial statements, the current ratio held between 1.89 and 2.61 while cash ranged from $46.9M to $206.1M, a modest buffer against total liabilities near $1.4B.
The current ratio above 1.9x in every quarter suggests short-term obligations are covered on paper, but the reliance on receivables collection with a DSO near 100 to 130 days means liquidity depends on timely customer and government payments. Quick ratio tracking close to the current ratio indicates limited inventory dependence, which is consistent with the services-oriented model. Under severe stress, the thin cash cushion relative to liabilities warrants further investigation, particularly if goodwill impairment compressed equity.
Asset Turnover Misread as Efficiency Signal
Asset turnover near 0.14x to 0.16x is often read as weak efficiency, yet for an asset base dominated by goodwill and acquired intangibles, this ratio obscures the operating economics of the business.
Asset turnover is commonly misapplied to VRRM because goodwill of $676.8M to $838.2M inflates the denominator and mechanically depresses the ratio regardless of operational performance. A more informative substitute is return on tangible capital or free cash flow to tangible assets, which strips out acquisition accounting effects. Based on reported figures, using these alternatives would likely present a more favorable picture of capital productivity than the headline asset turnover suggests.