Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 11.6x · EV/EBITDA 17.6x · ROE 9.1%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.0B | $2.6B | $2.3B | $3.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $4.0B | $3.6B | $2.9B | $3.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 11.60 | 10.89 | 10.24 | 9.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 10.42 | 9.02 | 9.00 | 14.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.02 | 0.96 | 0.87 | 1.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 18.82 | 16.30 | 26.09 | 21.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 18.72 | 16.22 | 25.91 | 21.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 12.26 | 11.64 | 16.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.63 | 15.84 | 15.06 | 18.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 17.77 | 12.25 | 6.24 | 8.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 22.14 | 33.75 | 24.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 89.1% | 89.1% | 89.7% | 91.5% | 93.6% | 93.3% | 93.2% | 94.4% | 95.7% | 95.4% | 95.2% |
| Operating Margin | 76.8% | 76.8% | 76.7% | 85.2% | 80.0% | 80.0% | — | 155.4% | 123.0% | 162.0% | 110.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 83.4% | 83.4% | 88.5% | 147.6% | 136.8% | 108.2% | 44.7% | 93.2% | 70.1% | 115.2% | 49.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.1% | 9.1% | 8.7% | 15.3% | 15.8% | 13.6% | 6.0% | 12.4% | 9.0% | 12.7% | 4.7% |
| ROA | 5.7% | 5.7% | 5.7% | 9.4% | 8.5% | 6.9% | 3.1% | 6.6% | 4.9% | 7.6% | 3.0% |
| ROIC | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.7% | 5.1% | 4.9% | 5.1% | — | 9.8% | 7.6% | 9.6% | 5.9% |
| ROCE | 5.3% | 5.3% | 5.1% | 5.6% | 5.1% | 5.2% | — | 11.1% | 8.6% | 10.7% | 7.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.36 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.67 | 5.67 | 4.36 | 4.97 | 6.48 | 7.17 | 5.00 | 3.17 | 4.27 | 3.28 | 3.40 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.34 | 0.26 | 0.17 | 0.48 | 0.33 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.48 | 0.31 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.18 | 4.18 | 3.42 | 2.25 | 5.51 | 3.70 | 4.29 | 2.84 | 3.88 | 2.77 | 2.92 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.84 | 7.66 | 2.91 | 13.79 | 4.51 | 7.23 | 6.30 | 7.38 | 6.00 | 4.33 |
| Interest Coverage | 5.16 | 5.16 | 10.63 | 9.24 | 7.29 | 5.98 | 4.26 | 5.73 | 4.64 | 9.01 | 6.04 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 162.93 | 162.93 | 2.67 | 3.84 | 2.98 | 7.17 | 5.02 | 7.56 | 6.00 | 10.31 | 13.51 |
| Quick Ratio | 162.93 | 162.93 | 2.67 | 3.71 | 2.98 | 7.17 | 5.02 | 7.56 | 6.00 | 10.31 | 13.51 |
| Cash Ratio | 139.02 | 139.02 | 2.03 | 3.40 | 2.05 | 6.74 | 4.23 | 5.98 | 3.90 | 7.58 | 8.20 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | 0.94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.5% | 2.6% | 2.8% | 2.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 28.5% | 18.8% | 23.4% | 31.8% | 80.6% | 29.3% | 51.5% | 31.0% | 63.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.6% | 9.2% | 9.8% | 10.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 5.3% | 6.1% | 3.8% | 4.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.2% | 1.4% | 1.9% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.7% | 4.0% | 4.7% | 2.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $86M | $88M | $77M | $69M | $69M | $57M | $59M | $60M | $61M | $63M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying VTMX stock.
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V.'s current P/E ratio is 11.6x. The historical average is 10.3x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V.'s current EV/EBITDA is 17.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 16.6x.
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V.'s return on equity (ROE) is 9.1%. The historical average is 9.3%.
Based on historical data, Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. is trading at a P/E of 11.6x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V.'s current dividend yield is 2.45%.
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. has 89.1% gross margin and 76.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Earnings quality from non-cash gains
Nearshoring Premium Justifies Multiple
VTMX trades at 33.7x forward P/FFO, a premium to U.S. industrial peers like PLD at 39.7x but below its own 2024 peak, reflecting nearshoring growth expectations.
The P/FFO of 33.7x in 2026Q2 is elevated relative to the 28.8x seen in 2024Q1, suggesting the market is pricing in sustained rent growth from nearshoring demand. However, this premium appears justified given VTMX's internal development platform and land bank scarcity, which supports higher yields on cost than peers. The implied cap rate, derived from NOI and enterprise value, likely sits below the 6-7% range typical of Mexican industrial transactions, indicating the market is paying up for growth rather than current yield.
NOI Margin Stability Masks FFO Volatility
NOI margin held at 88.4% in 2026Q2, consistent with the 90% average over the past year, but FFO per share swung from $2.04 to $1.09, indicating non-cash distortions.
The stable NOI margin of 88.4% reflects efficient triple-net lease cost recovery, but the sharp FFO volatility—dropping from $2.04 in 2025Q4 to $1.09 in 2026Q2—suggests that reported FFO is influenced by timing of lease commencements and possibly non-cash items. The high net margin of 83.4% versus operating margin of 76.8% implies significant fair value gains on investment properties, which are not distributable. Investors should focus on same-store NOI growth, which appears positive given revenue up 13.3% YoY, but the quality of that growth is clouded by potential revaluation effects.
Payout Ratio Signals Ample Coverage
FFO payout ratio of 18.3% in 2026Q2 indicates VTMX retains over 80% of FFO for development, a conservative stance that supports dividend sustainability despite recent volatility.
The payout ratio of 18.3% is exceptionally low, even compared to the 10% seen in 2025Q4, reflecting a deliberate strategy to retain cash for the development pipeline. This provides a substantial safety margin, as even a 50% decline in FFO would still leave the dividend well covered. However, the 103.4% payout in 2025Q1 highlights that FFO can be temporarily depressed by non-cash items, so investors should monitor AFFO, which closely tracks FFO, to ensure the dividend remains covered on a cash basis.
Low Leverage Provides Strategic Flexibility
Debt-to-equity of 0.37 in 2026Q2, down from 0.56 in 2025Q3, reflects IPO proceeds and positions VTMX with significant dry powder for development, though interest coverage dipped to 6.63x.
The debt-to-equity ratio of 0.37 is well below the 0.61 average of U.S. industrial peers, indicating a conservative balance sheet that can withstand higher interest rates. Interest coverage of 6.63x, while lower than the 16.3x in 2024Q1, remains healthy and suggests ample capacity to service debt. The $336M in cash from the NYSE IPO provides a liquidity cushion, but investors should monitor deployment efficiency; if not invested in high-yielding projects, it could drag on ROE, which currently stands at 3.4%.
Occupancy and G&A Efficiency Support Growth
With NOI margin at 88.4% and operating margin at 76.8%, VTMX demonstrates lean overhead, while occupancy in nearshoring corridors like Tijuana remains near zero vacancy, underpinning pricing power.
The high operating margin of 76.8% indicates that G&A costs are well-controlled relative to the asset base, a key efficiency metric for REITs. The portfolio's concentration in the Bajío and Northern border regions, where vacancy is near zero, suggests strong tenant demand and the ability to push rents. However, this geographic concentration also exposes VTMX to regional risks, such as energy infrastructure bottlenecks in Northern Mexico, which could delay stabilization of new developments. Investors should monitor occupancy trends in these submarkets as a leading indicator of rent growth sustainability.
Premium Valuation vs. Mexican and U.S. Peers
VTMX's P/FFO of 33.7x exceeds FIBRA Prologis and Terrafina, but its low leverage and internal development platform justify a premium, though it lags Prologis on scale.
Compared to U.S. industrial peers like Prologis (P/FFO 39.7x) and Rexford (43.1x), VTMX trades at a discount, reflecting country risk but also a nearshoring growth premium. Within Mexico, VTMX's debt-to-equity of 0.37 is far lower than FIBRA Prologis's 0.61, suggesting a stronger balance sheet. The internal development platform allows VTMX to capture the full development spread, unlike peers reliant on acquisitions, which may explain its higher NOI margin of 88.4% versus the 32-38% seen in U.S. peers. However, the market may be overpaying for growth if nearshoring demand slows, so investors should compare implied cap rates to private transaction data.
P/E Misleads Due to Depreciation and Gains
Standard P/E of 12.32x is distorted by non-cash fair value gains and depreciation, obscuring VTMX's true earnings power; P/FFO or P/AFFO should be used instead.
The P/E of 12.32x appears cheap, but it is artificially depressed by large non-cash gains from property revaluations, which inflate net income. For REITs, P/FFO is the appropriate metric, and at 33.7x, VTMX is not cheap. Similarly, debt-to-equity using book value understates leverage because investment properties are marked to market; debt-to-gross-assets would provide a clearer picture. Investors should adjust for the lease-up period of new developments, as FFO may be temporarily low until buildings stabilize, and focus on AFFO to capture maintenance capex requirements.