Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -41.1x · EV/EBITDA 50.4x · ROE N/A. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.6B | $13.1B | $5.5B | $7.0B | $3.5B | $19.8B | $22.4B | $8.3B | $8.1B | $7.0B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise Value | $16.2B | $15.7B | $8.4B | $9.9B | $6.6B | $22.1B | $23.9B | $10.1B | $8.2B | $6.9B | $2.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | -41.10 | — | — | — | — | — | 121.40 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.09 | 1.05 | 0.46 | 0.59 | 0.29 | 1.44 | 1.59 | 0.91 | 1.19 | 1.48 | 0.88 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.52 |
| P/FCF | 41.41 | 39.78 | 65.68 | — | — | 151.98 | 20.73 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 25.51 | 24.51 | 17.20 | 20.15 | — | 48.19 | 15.83 | — | 94.97 | 207.59 | 47.42 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.26 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 0.54 | 1.61 | 1.69 | 1.11 | 1.21 | 1.46 | 0.82 |
| EV / EBITDA | 50.36 | 48.69 | — | — | — | 96.95 | 37.04 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 953.81 | — | — | — | — | — | 68.03 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 47.66 | 100.68 | — | — | 170.04 | 22.11 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 30.2% | 30.2% | 30.2% | 30.6% | 28.0% | 28.4% | 29.1% | 23.5% | 23.4% | 23.7% | 23.9% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | 0.1% | -3.9% | -6.8% | -11.3% | -0.7% | 2.5% | -10.2% | -7.0% | -5.0% | -5.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -2.5% | -2.5% | -4.2% | -6.1% | -10.9% | -1.0% | 1.3% | -10.8% | -7.4% | -5.2% | -5.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -1575.4% | -120.8% |
| ROA | -9.1% | -9.1% | -14.2% | -20.9% | -32.7% | -2.9% | 4.9% | -40.7% | -32.5% | -24.8% | -26.7% |
| ROIC | — | — | -212.8% | -167.1% | -161.7% | -13.6% | 47.1% | -216.3% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | 1.4% | 1.4% | -38.7% | -58.1% | -71.7% | -4.0% | 19.2% | -88.9% | -77.3% | -69.4% | -78.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.87 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 12.63 | 12.63 | — | — | — | 17.78 | 5.61 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -2.66 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 8.05 | 8.05 | — | — | — | 10.30 | 2.32 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 7.88 | 35.00 | — | — | 18.06 | 1.38 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -2.69 | -2.69 | -15.62 | -41.88 | -47.85 | -3.06 | 2.41 | -16.85 | -16.58 | -24.88 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.93 | 1.36 | 1.41 | 0.85 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 0.86 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 1.33 | 1.38 | 0.82 | 1.06 | 1.07 | 0.82 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 1.08 | 1.20 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.63 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 3.62 | 3.43 | 3.46 | 3.41 | 3.00 | 3.10 | 3.09 | 3.59 | 3.89 | 4.44 |
| Inventory Turnover | 122.42 | 122.42 | 108.91 | 111.15 | 97.80 | 142.22 | 192.94 | 113.14 | 112.48 | 128.45 | 138.68 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 3.87 | 8.93 | 7.12 | 10.19 | 7.88 | 4.44 | 5.92 | 5.39 | 6.25 | 5.85 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.8% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 2.4% | 2.5% | 1.5% | — | — | 0.7% | 4.8% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $130M | $123M | $114M | $106M | $104M | $99M | $92M | $89M | $87M | $85M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying W stock.
Wayfair Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -41.1x. The historical average is 121.4x.
Wayfair Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 50.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 60.9x.
Based on historical data, Wayfair Inc. is trading at a P/E of -41.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Wayfair Inc. has 30.2% gross margin and 0.1% operating margin.
Wayfair Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 12.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent net losses despite cash generation
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Hinges on Cost Discipline
Wayfair's gross margin has held near 30% for ten quarters, while operating margin swung from -8.6% in 2024Q1 to 3.0% in 2026Q2, per reported financials, indicating fragile profitability.
The stability of gross margin around 30% suggests limited pricing power in a competitive online furniture market, with the recent operating margin improvement driven almost entirely by SG&A reductions rather than underlying product economics. Net margin remains negative at -0.0% in 2026Q2, reflecting persistent non-operating costs and taxes that continue to offset operational gains. Investors should monitor whether the operating margin can sustain above 3% without further cost cuts, as the current level is thin relative to revenue.
Negative CCC Masks Working Capital Reliance
Wayfair's cash conversion cycle improved to -37 days in 2026Q2, driven by a DPO of 45 days against minimal DSO and DIO, according to quarterly data, suggesting strong supplier leverage.
The negative CCC indicates that Wayfair collects cash from customers well before paying suppliers, a structural advantage of its drop-ship model. However, the working capital swings that drive OCF volatility, such as the $170M inflow in 2026Q2, may not be sustainable, as they depend on maintaining extended payment terms with suppliers. Asset turnover has improved to 1.20 in 2026Q2 from 0.81 in 2024Q1, reflecting better revenue generation per dollar of assets, but this is partly due to a shrinking asset base.
High Leverage with No Equity Buffer
Wayfair's debt-to-EBITDA stood at 20.7x in 2026Q2, with interest coverage of just 1.05x, per reported figures, indicating elevated leverage and thin debt service capacity.
The D/EBITDA ratio has improved from 45.4x in 2026Q1 but remains extremely high, reflecting a debt load of $3.5B against negative equity of -$2.8B. Interest coverage of 1.05x in 2026Q2 suggests that operating income barely covers interest expense, leaving little room for adverse shocks. While the company has generated positive operating cash flow, the leverage metrics indicate that refinancing risk and covenant headroom warrant close monitoring.
Thin Liquidity with Negative Working Capital
Wayfair's current ratio was 0.74 in 2026Q2, with quick ratio at 0.71, per financial statements, indicating that current liabilities exceed current assets and liquidity is tight.
The sub-1.0 current ratio suggests that Wayfair relies on ongoing cash generation and supplier financing to meet short-term obligations, which is typical for a negative CCC model but leaves little buffer under stress. Cash of $1.1B against total debt of $3.5B provides some cushion, but the negative equity and persistent net losses imply that external financing may be constrained. Investors should monitor whether the company can maintain positive operating cash flow to service debt without further asset sales or equity issuance.
Margin Gap vs. Peers Highlights Structural Disadvantage
Wayfair's net margin of -0.0% in 2026Q2 lags Williams-Sonoma's 13.9% and RH's 3.6%, per peer data, while its EV/EBITDA of 52x far exceeds the group.
The gross margin gap of over 14 percentage points versus peers suggests that Wayfair's asset-light, marketplace-heavy model inherently yields lower product margins, which may be a structural rather than temporary disadvantage. Its EV/EBITDA of 52x implies the market is pricing in significant future EBITDA growth, yet the company has only recently turned operating margin positive. The negative equity and high leverage further differentiate Wayfair from profitable peers like WSM, which has a D/E of 0.70 and ROIC of 44.3%.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA on Negative Equity
EV/EBITDA is commonly misapplied to Wayfair because its negative equity and volatile EBITDA make the multiple misleading, per reported data, obscuring the true cash generation.
With negative equity of -$2.8B and EBITDA that has only recently turned positive, EV/EBITDA of 52x fails to capture the balance sheet risk and the non-cash charges that distort earnings. A more appropriate metric would be EV/Operating Cash Flow or EV/FCF, which better reflects the company's cash generation, as evidenced by the $360M OCF in 2026Q2 against a net loss. Investors should also consider the sustainability of working capital inflows, as the negative CCC may not persist if supplier terms tighten.