The balance sheet shows liability-driven growth with equity flat near $1.7B while assets swung from $3.8B to $6.2B, and the equity-to-assets ratio declined from 0.45 to 0.35, indicating a thinning capital buffer and reliance on wholesale funding (debt-to-equity of 1.29).
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD) balance sheet — 18-year assets, liabilities & shareholders' equity history
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 | Dec'19 | Dec'18 | Dec'17 | Dec'16 | Dec'15 | Dec'14 | Dec'13 | Dec'12 | Dec'11 | Dec'10 | Dec'09 | Dec'08 |
|---|
| Cash & Short Term Investments | 1.08B | 299.31M | 279.27M | 328.7M | 225.95M | 305.63M | 321.1M | 120.69M | 90.06M | 191.22M | 118.76M | 136.99M | 113.35M | 170.56M | 65.03M | 53.82M | 33.28M | 10.39M | 6.81M |
| Cash & Due from Banks | 183.24M | 299.31M | 279.27M | 328.7M | 225.95M | 305.63M | 321.1M | 120.69M | 90.06M | 191.22M | 118.76M | 136.99M | 113.35M | 170.56M | 65.03M | 53.82M | 33.28M | 10.39M | 6.81M |
| Short Term Investments | 239.35M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Investments | 466.23M | 241.4M | 207.24M | 215.38M | 198.85M | 164.86M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.68M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Investments Growth % | 97.5% | 16.48% | -3.78% | 8.31% | 20.61% | - | - | - | - | - | -100% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Long-Term Investments | 904.32M | 241.4M | 207.24M | 215.38M | 198.85M | 164.86M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.68M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Accounts Receivables | 460.1M | 0 | 335.88M | 233.56M | 202.25M | 212.02M | 65.73M | 52.15M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40.93M | 18.5M | 0 | 15.79M | 0 |
| Goodwill & Intangibles | 1.77B | 1.01B | 1.88B | 1.99B | 2.13B | 1.84B | 1.11B | 901.76M | 847.24M | 759.3M | 619.3M | 503.84M | 452.49M | 414.8M | 379.9M | 137.08M | 107.45M | 82.83M | 38.94M |
| Goodwill | 868.71M | 868.71M | 868.71M | 901.71M | 959.71M | 698.63M | 248.96M | 180.42M | 177.09M | 124.54M | 97.37M | 91.49M | 76.59M | 61.78M | 59.73M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Intangible Assets | 906.15M | 141.88M | 1.01B | 1.09B | 1.17B | 1.14B | 864.69M | 721.33M | 670.15M | 634.76M | 521.93M | 412.35M | 375.91M | 353.02M | 320.17M | 137.08M | 107.45M | 82.83M | 38.94M |
| PP&E (Net) | 0 | 0 | 128.48M | 119.19M | 94.76M | 97.57M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -29.14M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Assets | 658.56M | 0 | 428.95M | 234.07M | 319.84M | 231.23M | 184.22M | 139.59M | -2.71B | -2.13B | -2.96B | 42.22M | 48.2M | 43.22M | 51.13M | 18.91M | 9.34M | 13.63M | 9.38M |
| Total Current Assets | 1.6B | 718.67M | 1.74B | 1.49B | 1.3B | 2.88B | 3.35B | 1.63B | 1.85B | 1.36B | 2.32B | 2.97B | 1.51B | 669.37M | 1.26B | 366.61M | 368.83M | 147.28M | 135.02M |
| Total Non-Current Assets | 2.66B | 1.25B | 2.64B | 2.56B | 2.75B | 2.33B | 1.3B | 1.04B | 930.85M | 852.64M | 730.77M | 546.06M | 500.69M | 458.02M | 431.03M | 155.99M | 116.79M | 96.45M | 48.33M |
| Total Assets | 4.26B | 5.06B | 4.38B | 4.05B | 4.05B | 5.21B | 4.65B | 2.68B | 2.78B | 2.21B | 3.05B | 3.51B | 2.01B | 1.13B | 1.69B | 522.6M | 485.62M | 243.73M | 183.35M |
| Asset Growth % | 30.27% | 15.46% | 8.13% | 0.17% | -22.29% | 11.93% | 73.86% | -3.77% | 25.89% | -27.65% | -13.16% | 74.53% | 78.65% | -33.24% | 223.12% | 7.61% | 99.24% | 32.93% | - |
| Return on Assets (ROA) | -0.6% | 1.21% | 2.56% | 2.65% | 4.62% | 5.39% | 6.72% | 6.36% | 6.47% | 8.03% | 3.47% | 2.97% | 3.27% | 2.95% | 3.05% | 6.92% | 2.26% | 18.51% | 4.75% |
| Accounts Payable | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 187.41M | 130.48M | 93.21M | 67.68M | 60.63M | 69.21M | 66.76M | 36.41M | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Debt | 1.57B | 2.25B | 1.66B | 1.47B | 1.32B | 2.71B | 2.81B | 1.2B | 1.46B | 1.1B | 2.15B | 2.81B | 1.39B | 546.37M | 1.17B | 252.22M | 284.97M | 138.32M | 150.61M |
| Net Debt | 1.38B | 1.95B | 1.38B | 1.14B | 1.1B | 2.41B | 2.49B | 1.08B | 1.37B | 910.41M | 2.04B | 2.68B | 1.27B | 375.8M | 1.1B | 198.4M | 251.68M | 127.93M | 143.8M |
| Long-Term Debt | 804.61M | 0 | 1.55B | 1.37B | 1.24B | 2.68B | 2.81B | 1.2B | 296.01M | 1.1B | 279.69M | 235.97M | 1.39B | 0 | 72.63M | 0 | 0 | 138.32M | 150.61M |
| Short-Term Debt | 762.52M | 2.25B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.16B | 0 | 1.99B | 2.65B | 0 | 546.37M | 1.17B | 242.29M | 276.04M | 0 | 0 |
| Other Liabilities | 1.03B | 827.13M | 692.96M | 476.41M | 563.44M | 565.47M | 431.41M | 270.02M | 1.43B | -67.7M | 1.9B | 2.61B | -1.12B | 100.28M | 31.83M | 71.68M | 53.26M | 12.26M | 9.48M |
| Total Current Liabilities | 762.52M | 2.25B | 30.54M | 113.55M | 200.35M | 125.81M | 14.47M | 8M | 331.34M | 245M | 103.69M | 72.8M | 74.3M | 147.11M | 76.27M | 46.84M | 33.46M | 23.34M | 9.4M |
| Total Non-Current Liabilities | 1.83B | 1.06B | 2.59B | 2.19B | 2.13B | 3.5B | 3.44B | 1.62B | 1.54B | 1.15B | 2.33B | 2.95B | 1.51B | 577.44M | 1.26B | 312.11M | 327.52M | 150.58M | 160.09M |
| Total Liabilities | 2.59B | 3.31B | 2.62B | 2.31B | 2.33B | 3.63B | 3.45B | 1.63B | 1.87B | 1.39B | 2.44B | 3.02B | 1.58B | 724.55M | 1.34B | 358.94M | 360.98M | 173.92M | 169.5M |
| Total Equity | 1.67B | 1.75B | 1.76B | 1.75B | 1.72B | 1.58B | 1.2B | 1.04B | 907.19M | 814.98M | 615.07M | 492.35M | 433.45M | 402.84M | 353.18M | 163.65M | 124.64M | 69.81M | 13.85M |
| Equity Growth % | -9.97% | -0.74% | 0.79% | 1.71% | 8.78% | 31.93% | 14.77% | 14.89% | 11.31% | 32.5% | 24.93% | 13.59% | 7.6% | 14.06% | 115.81% | 31.3% | 78.54% | 404.05% | - |
| Equity / Assets (Capital Ratio) | 39.13% | 34.53% | 40.16% | 43.09% | 42.44% | 30.32% | 25.72% | 38.96% | 32.63% | 36.9% | 20.15% | 14.01% | 21.52% | 35.73% | 20.91% | 31.32% | 25.67% | 28.64% | 7.55% |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | -1.77% | 3.26% | 6.17% | 6.2% | 12.98% | 19.16% | 21.99% | 17.79% | 18.75% | 29.53% | 20.57% | 17.74% | 12.3% | 10.99% | 13.07% | 24.19% | 8.46% | 94.49% | 62.82% |
| Book Value per Share | 50.08 | 52.35 | 53.08 | 53.11 | 52.52 | 50.05 | 38.48 | 33.82 | 28.31 | 25.31 | 19.73 | 15.91 | 13.29 | 11.73 | 13.67 | 7.53 | 8.29 | 4.88 | 0.94 |
| Tangible BV per Share | -3.24 | 22.07 | -3.56 | -7.45 | -12.75 | -8.19 | 2.66 | 4.56 | 1.87 | 1.73 | -0.14 | -0.37 | -0.58 | -0.35 | -1.03 | 1.22 | 1.14 | -0.91 | -1.70 |
| Common Stock | 333K | 334K | 332K | 329K | 323K | 320K | 307K | 300K | 295K | 300K | 296K | 295K | 318K | 340K | 336K | 217K | 214K | 147K | 0 |
| Additional Paid-in Capital | 469.75M | 450.43M | 429M | 425.49M | 412.64M | 393.02M | 241M | 237.88M | 235.15M | 229.08M | 228.89M | 215.57M | 224.16M | 244.95M | 236.82M | 81.19M | 77.05M | 28.51M | 0 |
| Retained Earnings | 1.18B | 1.28B | 1.32B | 1.3B | 1.28B | 1.15B | 952.94M | 796.77M | 666.75M | 579.94M | 381.03M | 272.03M | 208.97M | 157.55M | 116.02M | 82.25M | 47.38M | 41.16M | 0 |
| Accumulated OCI | -759K | 1.88M | 586K | -479K | -1.57M | 2.56M | 1.97M | 737K | -75K | 814.98M | 615.07M | 215.87M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Treasury Stock | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Preferred Stock | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying WD stock.
As of 2025, Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD) had total assets of $5.06B including $718.7M in current assets.
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD) carries total debt of $2.25B. Comparing total debt to cash helps evaluate the company's debt burden and net leverage.
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD) has total shareholders' equity (book value) of $1.74B ($52.35 book value per share). Book value represents the net worth of the company belonging to common stock holders.
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD) reported a current ratio of 0.32x. A current ratio above 1.0x indicates that the company has more current assets than current liabilities, suggesting sufficient short-term liquidity.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Credit costs and earnings volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Asset Growth Volatile, Equity Stable
Total assets swung from $3.8B to $6.2B over ten quarters, yet equity remained near $1.7B, indicating growth is liability-driven and not building capital, as per reported figures.
The balance sheet expansion appears tied to warehouse lending and securities activity rather than organic capital generation, with equity essentially flat across the period. This suggests the company is not retaining earnings to strengthen its capital base, consistent with the prior income statement finding of strained profitability. Investors should monitor whether asset growth translates into durable franchise value or merely reflects cyclical transaction volumes.
No Deposit Base, Funding via Debt
Walker & Dunlop reports no deposit liabilities, with a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.29, indicating reliance on wholesale funding and corporate debt rather than a core deposit franchise, based on the data.
The absence of deposits means the company lacks a stable, low-cost funding source, making it more sensitive to credit market conditions. The reported debt-to-equity of 1.29 is low for a financial firm, but this may understate leverage if warehouse facilities are off-balance-sheet. This structure suggests the balance sheet is more akin to a mortgage REIT than a traditional bank, with funding costs directly tied to market rates.
Provision Surge Signals Rising Credit Risk
Loan loss provisions escalated from $129.1M in 2024Q1 to $193.9M in 2025Q3, indicating deteriorating credit quality in the multifamily portfolio, as reported in financial statements.
The rising provisions appear to reflect higher expected losses, possibly driven by elevated operating and insurance costs compressing debt service coverage ratios. While the DUS risk-sharing model historically shows low defaults, the magnitude of the increase warrants close monitoring. If realized losses track provisions, the company's risk-sharing obligations could erode earnings further, as evidenced by the 2026Q2 EPS miss.
Equity Flat, Capital Buffer Thin
Equity remained at approximately $1.7B across ten quarters, with equity-to-assets declining from 0.45 to 0.35, indicating a thinning capital buffer relative to balance sheet growth, per the data.
The stable equity base suggests limited internal capital generation, while asset growth has outpaced equity, weakening the capital ratio. This may constrain the company's ability to absorb credit losses or pursue strategic acquisitions without raising external capital. The low return on equity, averaging around 1% in recent quarters, underscores the strain on capital adequacy.
Cash and Securities Provide Modest Buffer
Cash and investment securities totaled $331.6M in 2026Q2, representing about 6.8% of assets, offering a limited liquidity cushion against funding disruptions, based on reported figures.
The liquidity position appears adequate for a fee-based model, but the reliance on wholesale funding and lack of deposits increases vulnerability to market stress. The securities portfolio, though modest, provides some contingent liquidity, but its composition and marketability are unclear. Given the volatility in operating cash flow, investors should assess whether this buffer is sufficient to cover near-term obligations.
Rate Sensitivity Cuts Both Ways
Higher rates likely suppress origination volumes but may boost MSR valuations and interest income on escrow balances, creating a mixed forward outlook for the balance sheet, as per company intelligence.
The sustained high-rate environment appears to be slowing capital markets activity, which could reduce fee income and asset turnover. However, rising rates may also increase the value of mortgage servicing rights, providing a non-cash offset to earnings. The net impact on the balance sheet will depend on the duration of the rate cycle and the company's ability to grow its servicing portfolio, which remains the core annuity.
Unrealized Losses and Off-Balance Sheet Risks
The balance sheet may harbor unrealized losses in the securities portfolio and off-balance-sheet risk-sharing obligations that are not fully captured in reported equity, warranting further investigation.
Given the rise in interest rates, the investment securities portfolio could carry unrealized losses that reduce economic capital, though these are not visible in the provided data. Additionally, the DUS risk-sharing model implies contingent liabilities that may not appear on the balance sheet, potentially understating true leverage. Investors should scrutinize the footnotes for MSR valuations and credit guarantees to assess the full risk profile.