Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 31.7x · EV/EBITDA 5.3x · ROE 3.4%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.6B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.7B | $2.0B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $7.0B | $8.9B | $12.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $1.6B | $1.6B | $1.5B | $1.7B | $1.9B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $6.8B | $8.7B | $12.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 31.73 | 29.67 | 27.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.01 | 0.96 | 0.84 | 1.15 | 1.55 | 1.40 | 1.73 | 2.01 | 13.43 | 19.59 | 26.06 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.08 | 1.01 | 0.97 | 1.34 | 1.54 | 0.89 | 1.90 | 1.44 | 6.78 | 7.98 | 9.69 |
| P/FCF | 16.56 | 15.80 | 55.76 | 107.28 | — | — | — | — | — | 3104.85 | — |
| P/OCF | 7.70 | 7.35 | 8.52 | 12.56 | 24.67 | 71.58 | 16.56 | 43.33 | — | 359.56 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.98 | 0.85 | 1.12 | 1.45 | 1.24 | 1.68 | 1.72 | 13.09 | 19.13 | 25.40 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.35 | 5.11 | 5.03 | 8.18 | 11.33 | 20.23 | 13.46 | 23.54 | 407.21 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 14.21 | 15.63 | 13.24 | 68.12 | 86.86 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 16.08 | 56.47 | 104.67 | — | — | — | — | — | 3032.25 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 12.8% | 12.8% | 13.6% | 7.3% | 6.4% | 0.1% | -0.8% | 12.1% | 11.7% | 4.9% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.2% | 7.2% | 7.4% | 2.3% | 1.9% | -8.9% | -4.3% | -8.7% | -18.1% | -31.1% | -23.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 3.2% | 3.2% | 3.0% | -1.5% | -1.6% | -16.0% | -45.5% | -40.6% | -17.4% | -35.1% | -27.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.4% | 3.4% | 3.7% | -1.8% | -1.6% | -13.8% | -43.2% | -25.5% | -8.4% | -13.1% | -9.8% |
| ROA | 2.2% | 2.2% | 2.3% | -1.2% | -1.0% | -8.8% | -29.8% | -21.5% | -7.4% | -11.2% | -8.2% |
| ROIC | 5.7% | 5.7% | 6.9% | 2.2% | 1.5% | -6.3% | -3.6% | -5.0% | -8.0% | -11.2% | -9.4% |
| ROCE | 6.1% | 6.1% | 7.3% | 2.3% | 1.5% | -6.0% | -3.4% | -5.2% | -8.6% | -10.7% | -7.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 2.17 | 1.08 | 0.77 | 0.34 | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.02 | 0.01 | -0.03 | -0.10 | -0.10 | -0.05 | -0.20 | -0.17 | -0.19 | -0.24 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.06 | -0.20 | -0.76 | -2.55 | -0.35 | -3.86 | -10.75 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.28 | 0.71 | -2.61 | — | — | — | — | — | -72.60 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 7.05 | 7.05 | 8.83 | 6.31 | 88.56 | -12.15 | -53.89 | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.16 | 2.16 | 1.99 | 1.74 | 1.98 | 2.31 | 1.91 | 3.62 | 3.79 | 4.33 | 6.44 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.79 | 1.79 | 1.66 | 1.45 | 1.63 | 1.93 | 1.67 | 3.01 | 3.26 | 3.68 | 5.04 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.38 | 0.31 | 0.50 | 0.72 | 0.54 | 1.53 | 1.64 | 2.49 | 3.22 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.43 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.44 | 0.36 | 0.31 |
| Inventory Turnover | 8.35 | 8.35 | 9.30 | 9.78 | 7.79 | 6.59 | 12.75 | 6.47 | 6.65 | 5.66 | 2.69 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 115.53 | 116.40 | 119.84 | 127.29 | 150.22 | 115.67 | 104.92 | 132.32 | 102.09 | 125.34 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.2% | 3.4% | 3.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 6.0% | 6.3% | 1.8% | 0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 2.5% | 2.6% | 1.0% | 1.2% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.5% | 2.6% | 1.0% | 1.2% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $116M | $116M | $109M | $109M | $81M | $71M | $38M | $224M | $223M | $177M |
Offshore project cycle volatility
According to recent market data, XPRO trades at a forward P/E of 15.56, which appears to bake in a significant earnings recovery that remains unproven given the company's recent -6.17% revenue growth and the inherent lumpiness of its project-based offshore service model.
The current EV/EBITDA multiple of 5.35 suggests that investors are pricing the company as a cyclical recovery play rather than a high-growth entity. This valuation warrants caution, as the implied growth trajectory may be overly optimistic if deepwater project FIDs continue to face delays or if competitive pricing pressures persist in the tubular running services segment.
Based on reported financial figures, XPRO's ROIC has struggled to gain traction, hovering at a marginal 0.2% in 2026Q1, which suggests that the company is currently failing to generate returns that exceed its cost of capital in the capital-intensive deepwater services environment.
The persistent inability to drive ROIC above low single digits indicates that the company's specialized subsea assets are not yet being utilized at a scale sufficient to overcome their high depreciation and maintenance burdens. Investors should monitor whether future project wins can improve asset utilization rates, as current returns appear insufficient to justify the heavy capital intensity of the business.
As evidenced by the 2025Q4 data, XPRO's cash conversion cycle of 142 days highlights significant friction in working capital management, which appears to be driven by extended DSO levels that consistently exceed 120 days across recent reporting periods.
The extended collection cycle suggests that XPRO may have limited leverage over its offshore clients, forcing the company to carry the burden of long-term project financing on its own balance sheet. This inefficiency effectively traps cash in receivables, limiting the company's ability to reinvest in its fleet or return capital to shareholders.
According to recent quarterly filings, XPRO maintains a robust financial position with a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.06 as of 2026Q1, which provides a critical defensive buffer against the inherent volatility of the global offshore oil and gas services market.
This low leverage profile is a strategic necessity given the company's thin net margins and the cyclical nature of its revenue base. While this conservatism limits potential equity returns, it appears to be the correct posture for a firm operating in a sector where project cancellations can lead to sudden, sharp liquidity crunches.
Investors frequently misapply the P/E ratio to XPRO, failing to account for the significant non-cash depreciation and amortization charges inherent in its specialized subsea equipment fleet, which obscures the company's true underlying cash-generating capacity.
Because XPRO is a capital-intensive service provider, the P/E ratio is a poor proxy for value; it is heavily distorted by the accounting treatment of long-lived assets. A more appropriate metric for this business model would be EV/EBITDA or P/FCF, as these better capture the cash flow available to the firm after accounting for the necessary reinvestment required to maintain its competitive technical gatekeeper status.
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying XPRO stock.
Expro Group Holdings N.V.'s current P/E ratio is 31.7x. The historical average is 28.7x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Expro Group Holdings N.V.'s current EV/EBITDA is 5.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 25.8x.
Expro Group Holdings N.V.'s return on equity (ROE) is 3.4%. The historical average is -38.6%.
Based on historical data, Expro Group Holdings N.V. is trading at a P/E of 31.7x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Expro Group Holdings N.V. has 12.8% gross margin and 7.2% operating margin.
Expro Group Holdings N.V.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.7x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.