MODEL VERDICT
1stdibs.Com, Inc. (DIBS) — Relative Valuation
Peer multiples, Monte Carlo simulation & quality-adjusted fair value
Popular:
Peer multiples, Monte Carlo simulation & quality-adjusted fair value
Composite score derived from valuation, quality, and risk factors
Quantitative model thresholds · For educational and research purposes only
| Methodology | Fair Value | vs Current | Weight | Quality | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV To Revenue 61 industry peers | $2.68 | -50.6% | 4% | B | Data |
| Price / Sales 61 industry peers | $2.26 | -58.4% | 3% | B | Model Driven |
| Weighted Output Blended model output | $3.08 | -43.2% | 100% | 38 | SIGNIFICANTLY OVERVALUED |
Cross-sectional regression predicting expected multiples based on growth, margins, ROIC, and beta.
| Multiple | Avg | Median | Min | Max | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P/TBV | 1.85 | 1.42 | 1.36 | 3.19 | 0.90 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.77 | 1.37 | 1.32 | 3.02 | 0.83 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.59 | 2.11 | 1.52 | 4.63 | 1.39 |
Based on our peer multiples analysis with 5 valuation metrics, the model estimates DIBS's fair value at $3.08 vs the current price of $5.43, implying -43.2% downside potential. Model verdict: Significantly Overvalued. Confidence: 38/100. This is a quantitative estimate, not a recommendation.
The blended fair value of $3.08 is calculated using four lenses: industry median multiples (40%), historical multiples (30%), forward estimates (20%), and quality-adjusted multiples (10%). Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 iterations) gives a range of $1.77 (P10) to $4.82 (P90), with a median of $3.25.
DIBS's current P/E of -11.1x compares to the industry median of 25.4x (36 peers in the group). This represents a -143.6% discount to the industry. The historical average P/E is N/Ax over 0 years. Signal: Deep Discount.
4 analysts cover DIBS with a consensus rating of Buy. The consensus price target is $7.00 (range: $7.00 — $7.00), implying +28.9% upside from the current price. Grade breakdown: Strong Buy (0), Buy (2), Hold (2), Sell (0), Strong Sell (0).
The model confidence score is 38/100, based on: data completeness (6), peer quality (25), historical depth (10), earnings stability (5), and model agreement (2). Cyclicality penalty: --10 points. The model shows weak agreement across inputs — interpret with caution.
The model flags several key risks: (1) Macro/regulatory risks are not captured in this model but remain material.
Peak earnings risk data is not available for DIBS.
No. This dashboard is a quantitative research tool for educational and informational purposes only. It is not investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. The operator of this platform is not a registered investment advisor (RIA), broker-dealer, or financial planner. All model outputs, fair value estimates, signals, and scenarios are the result of automated quantitative computations and should not be construed as professional financial guidance. You should consult a qualified, licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past model performance is not indicative of future results.