MODEL VERDICT
Intapp, Inc. (INTA)
Relative Valuation•Peer multiples, Monte Carlo simulation & quality-adjusted fair value
Popular:
Composite score derived from valuation, quality, and risk factors
Quantitative model thresholds · For educational and research purposes only
Each row records the model's monthly assessment. High Conviction = the model detected notable undervaluation vs peers. Neutral = no notable divergence was found. The return column shows the actual price change over 90 days for reference. This is a quantitative observation log — not investment advice.
| Date | Assessment | Score | Price | Status | 90d Fwd Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2026 | MODERATE | 0.63 | $23.50 | CURRENT | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | MODERATE | 0.63 | $22.25 | CURRENT | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | MODERATE | 0.63 | $22.82 | CURRENT | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | MODERATE | 0.63 | $23.26 | CURRENT | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | MODERATE | 0.63 | $20.37 | CURRENT | — |
Historical model observations for research purposes only. Past quantitative patterns do not predict future results. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.
| Methodology | Fair Value | vs Current | Weight | Quality | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forward P/E 8 analyst estimates | $24.08 | +2.5% | 20% | A- | Analyst Est. |
| Price / Free Cash Flow 7 industry peers | $30.68 | +30.6% | 15% | B+ | Peer Data |
| EV/FCF 7 industry peers | $33.48 | +42.5% | 7% | B | Model Driven |
| EV To Revenue 8 industry peers | $33.32 | +41.8% | 4% | B | Data |
| Price / Sales 8 industry peers | $28.05 | +19.4% | 3% | B | Model Driven |
| FCF Yield 8 industry peers | $32.40 | +37.9% | 1% | B | Data |
| Weighted Output Blended model output | $42.55 | +81.1% | 100% | 63 | SIGNIFICANTLY UNDERVALUED |
Cross-sectional regression predicting expected multiples based on growth, margins, ROIC, and beta.
| Multiple | Avg | Median | Min | Max | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 87.41 | 91.21 | 29.60 | 137.61 | 47.36 |
| P/TBV | 69.09 | 55.07 | 23.60 | 142.59 | 55.15 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.83 | 6.94 | 4.48 | 8.81 | 1.70 |
| P/S Ratio | 7.65 | 7.15 | 5.62 | 10.64 | 1.85 |
Based on our peer multiples analysis with 15 valuation metrics, the model estimates INTA's fair value at $42.55 vs the current price of $23.50, implying +81.1% upside potential. Model verdict: Significantly Undervalued. Confidence: 63/100. This is a quantitative estimate, not a recommendation.
The blended fair value of $42.55 is calculated using four lenses: industry median multiples (40%), historical multiples (30%), forward estimates (20%), and quality-adjusted multiples (10%). Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 iterations) gives a range of $30.04 (P10) to $56.46 (P90), with a median of $43.10.
INTA's current P/E of -102.2x compares to the industry median of 29.9x (6 peers in the group). This represents a -442.2% discount to the industry. The historical average P/E is N/Ax over 0 years. Signal: Deep Discount.
12 analysts cover INTA with a consensus rating of Buy. The consensus price target is $36.80 (range: $33.00 — $46.00), implying +56.6% upside from the current price. Grade breakdown: Strong Buy (0), Buy (7), Hold (4), Sell (1), Strong Sell (0).
The model confidence score is 63/100, based on: data completeness (15), peer quality (25), historical depth (16), earnings stability (5), and model agreement (2). Cyclicality penalty: -0 points. The model shows moderate agreement across inputs.
The model flags several key risks: (1) Macro/regulatory risks are not captured in this model but remain material.
Peak earnings risk data is not available for INTA.
No. This dashboard is a quantitative research tool for educational and informational purposes only. It is not investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. The operator of this platform is not a registered investment advisor (RIA), broker-dealer, or financial planner. All model outputs, fair value estimates, signals, and scenarios are the result of automated quantitative computations and should not be construed as professional financial guidance. You should consult a qualified, licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past model performance is not indicative of future results.