Quantitative model thresholds · For educational and research purposes only
UNDER REVIEW — MONITOR
Model-Derived Price Zones
VALUE ZONE≤ $18
At $18 or below, the model calculates ~18% upside to estimated fair value.
✓ MOS: +17.6%
CAUTIOUS ZONE$18 — $20
Model shows limited upside (+5% to +18%).
CURRENT PRICE$15
Model Threshold Conditions
Model thresholds are satisfied when all 4 conditions align:
Price ≤ $18
Current: $14.97 (17.0% below threshold)
Confidence ≥ 75
Current: 80 / 100
Margin Z-Score ≤ +1.0σ
Current: +0.0σ
P50 Fair Value > Price
N/A
CONDITIONS: 3 of 4 MET
Monitor price and margins
Why $18?
At $18, the model calculates ~17.6% upside to estimated fair value ($21.21). At the current price ($14.97), the model shows 41.7% upside.
Model Observation History
Monthly model snapshots · Quantitative track record
Each row records the model's monthly assessment. High Conviction = the model detected notable undervaluation vs peers. Neutral = no notable divergence was found. The return column shows the actual price change over 90 days for reference. This is a quantitative observation log — not investment advice.
Date
Assessment
Score
Price
Status
90d Fwd Return
Feb 28, 2026
MODERATE
0.64
$14.97
CURRENT
—
Feb 21, 2026
MODERATE
0.64
$15.01
CURRENT
—
Feb 14, 2026
MODERATE
0.70
$16.38
CURRENT
—
Feb 11, 2026
MODERATE
0.70
$15.90
CURRENT
—
Jan 11, 2026
MODERATE
0.71
$15.22
Pending
+2.8%
50%
Positive 90d Rate
+1.8%
Avg 90d Change
28
Observations
Historical model observations for research purposes only. Past quantitative patterns do not predict future results. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.
Portfolio Fit Analysis
Hypothetical scenario analysis
Portfolio Archetype
Deep Value
Materially undervalued with solid fundamentals. Higher risk/reward profile.
CORRELATION TO S&P 500
0.34
LOW
Good diversification
POSITION SIZING CONTEXT
1–3%typical range for this archetype
Not a recommendation — sizing depends on individual portfolio, risk tolerance, and concentration
THRESHOLD PROXIMITY
4 / 5 — High
Threshold conditions are approaching alignment. Evaluate within personal risk framework.
Hypothetical Scenario
Illustrative scenario: A hypothetical tiered approach spread over 18–36 months. Position sizing should reflect individual risk tolerance, existing portfolio concentration, and correlation with current holdings. This is not a recommendation.
ValuationIs SEM undervalued based on peer comparison?
SIGNIFICANTLY UNDERVALUED
Based on our peer multiples analysis with 1 valuation metrics, the model estimates SEM's fair value at $21.21 vs the current price of $14.97, implying +41.7% upside potential. Model verdict: Significantly Undervalued. Confidence: 80/100. This is a quantitative estimate, not a recommendation.
ValuationWhat is SEM's fair value from multiples?
The blended fair value of $21.21 is calculated using four lenses: industry median multiples (40%), historical multiples (30%), forward estimates (20%), and quality-adjusted multiples (10%).
ValuationHow does SEM's P/E compare to the industry?
SEM's current P/E of 12.9x compares to the industry median of 19.9x (20 peers in the group). This represents a -35.1% discount to the industry. The historical average P/E is 9.0x over 7 years. Signal: Deep Discount.
ValuationWhat do analysts think about SEM?
13 analysts cover SEM with a consensus rating of Buy. The consensus price target is $18.00 (range: $17.00 — $19.00), implying +20.2% upside from the current price. Grade breakdown: Strong Buy (0), Buy (6), Hold (6), Sell (1), Strong Sell (0).
MethodologyHow confident is the relative valuation for SEM?
The model confidence score is 80/100, based on: data completeness (24), peer quality (25), historical depth (20), earnings stability (8), and model agreement (3). Cyclicality penalty: -0 points. The model shows strong agreement across inputs.
RiskWhat are the biggest risks to SEM's valuation?
The model flags several key risks: (1) Multiple compression: SEM trades at the 2500th percentile of its historical P/E range. A reversion to median (9.0×) would imply significant downside. (2) Macro/regulatory risks are not captured in this model but remain material.
RiskWhat does "peak earnings risk" mean for SEM?
Peak earnings risk refers to the possibility that SEM's current profitability is above its sustainable long-term trend. The model detects a margin Z-score of -1.0σ, meaning margins are 1.0 standard deviations below their historical average. If margins revert to the 7-year mean (4.1%), the model estimates fair value drops by 120.0% to approximately $15. This isn't a prediction — it's a scenario analysis.
LegalDoes this dashboard provide investment advice?
No. This dashboard is a quantitative research tool for educational and informational purposes only. It is not investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. The operator of this platform is not a registered investment advisor (RIA), broker-dealer, or financial planner. All model outputs, fair value estimates, signals, and scenarios are the result of automated quantitative computations and should not be construed as professional financial guidance. You should consult a qualified, licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past model performance is not indicative of future results.
Want to understand how this model works?
Learn about Monte Carlo simulations, confidence scoring, relative vs DCF valuation, margin of safety, and more.