MODEL VERDICT
Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY)
Relative Valuation•Peer multiples, Monte Carlo simulation & quality-adjusted fair value
Popular:
Composite score derived from valuation, quality, and risk factors
Quantitative model thresholds · For educational and research purposes only
Each row records the model's monthly assessment. High Conviction = the model detected notable undervaluation vs peers. Neutral = no notable divergence was found. The return column shows the actual price change over 90 days for reference. This is a quantitative observation log — not investment advice.
| Date | Assessment | Score | Price | Status | 90d Fwd Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2026 | MODERATE | 0.64 | $15.64 | CURRENT | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | MODERATE | 0.64 | $15.40 | CURRENT | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | MODERATE | 0.64 | $13.42 | CURRENT | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | MODERATE | 0.64 | $13.14 | CURRENT | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | MODERATE | 0.64 | $13.93 | CURRENT | — |
Historical model observations for research purposes only. Past quantitative patterns do not predict future results. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.
| Methodology | Fair Value | vs Current | Weight | Quality | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV/EBITDA 7 industry peers | $847.32 | +5317.6% | 20% | A- | Peer Data |
| Dividend Yield 5 industry peers | $13.89 | -11.2% | 18% | B | Supplementary |
| EV/EBIT 6 industry peers | $118.20 | +655.8% | 7% | B+ | Peer Data |
| EV To Revenue 7 industry peers | $1081.96 | +6817.9% | 4% | B | Data |
| Weighted Output Blended model output | $381.45 | +2338.9% | 100% | 66 | SIGNIFICANTLY UNDERVALUED |
Cross-sectional regression predicting expected multiples based on growth, margins, ROIC, and beta.
| Multiple | Avg | Median | Min | Max | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 0.55 | 0.35 | 0.17 | 1.77 | 0.61 |
| EV/EBIT | 7.10 | 4.82 | 3.02 | 14.35 | 4.28 |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.78 | 2.31 | 1.38 | 4.47 | 1.14 |
| P/FFO | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.05 |
| P/TBV | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| Div Yield | 0.71 | 0.97 | 0.03 | 1.14 | 0.60 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
Based on our peer multiples analysis with 9 valuation metrics, the model estimates SIFY's fair value at $381.45 vs the current price of $15.64, implying +2338.9% upside potential. Model verdict: Significantly Undervalued. Confidence: 66/100. This is a quantitative estimate, not a recommendation.
The blended fair value of $381.45 is calculated using four lenses: industry median multiples (40%), historical multiples (30%), forward estimates (20%), and quality-adjusted multiples (10%). Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 iterations) gives a range of $129.31 (P10) to $546.19 (P90), with a median of $320.45.
SIFY's current P/E of -117.9x compares to the industry median of 15.9x (6 peers in the group). This represents a -843.7% discount to the industry. The historical average P/E is 0.6x over 6 years. Signal: Deep Discount.
1 analysts cover SIFY with a consensus rating of Buy. The consensus price target is N/A (range: N/A — N/A), implying N/A upside from the current price. Grade breakdown: Strong Buy (0), Buy (1), Hold (0), Sell (0), Strong Sell (0).
The model confidence score is 66/100, based on: data completeness (15), peer quality (25), historical depth (20), earnings stability (4), and model agreement (2). Cyclicality penalty: -0 points. The model shows moderate agreement across inputs.
The model flags several key risks: (1) Macro/regulatory risks are not captured in this model but remain material.
Peak earnings risk data is not available for SIFY.
No. This dashboard is a quantitative research tool for educational and informational purposes only. It is not investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. The operator of this platform is not a registered investment advisor (RIA), broker-dealer, or financial planner. All model outputs, fair value estimates, signals, and scenarios are the result of automated quantitative computations and should not be construed as professional financial guidance. You should consult a qualified, licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past model performance is not indicative of future results.