FTHM vs HOUS

For growth investors, Anywhere Real Estate Inc.

(HOUS) is the stronger pick with 1. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). Analysts rate Anywhere Real Estate Inc. (HOUS) a "Hold" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Anywhere Real Estate Inc.

(HOUS) delivered a total return of +1. 1%, compared to -97. 4% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HOUS returned -36. 7% versus FTHM's -91. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Anywhere Real Estate Inc.

(HOUS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 86β versus Fathom Holdings Inc. 's 2. 42β — meaning FTHM is approximately 30% more volatile than HOUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 195% for Anywhere Real Estate Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Anywhere Real Estate Inc.

(HOUS) is pulling ahead at 1. 0% versus -2. 9% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fathom Holdings Inc. grew EPS 27. 2% year-over-year, compared to -30. 7% for Anywhere Real Estate Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTHM leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Anywhere Real Estate Inc.

(HOUS) is the more profitable company, earning -2. 2% net margin versus -6. 4% for Fathom Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps -2. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOUS leads at 1. 1% versus -7. 0% for FTHM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOUS leads at 34. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, HOUS (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. FTHM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Anywhere Real Estate Inc.

(HOUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOUS: -36. 7%, FTHM: -91. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.