Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FTHM vs HOUS vs EXPI vs DOUG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
Real Estate - Services
Real Estate - Services
FTHM vs HOUS vs EXPI vs DOUG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $27M | $1.98B | $1.05B | $188M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $422M | $5.87B | $4.77B | $1.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $-128M | $-23M | $15M |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | 47.3% | 7.0% | 16.8% |
| Operating Margin | -4.7% | 20.3% | -0.4% | -5.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 93.1x | 21.3x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $3.06B | $0.00 | $103M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $118M | $124M | $120M |
FTHM vs HOUS vs EXPI vs DOUG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) | 100 | 4.1 | -95.9% |
| Anywhere Real Estat… (HOUS) | 100 | 84.2 | -15.8% |
| eXp World Holdings,… (EXPI) | 100 | 19.4 | -80.6% |
| Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) | 100 | 19.5 | -80.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTHM vs HOUS vs EXPI vs DOUG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FTHM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HOUS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +375.5% vs EXPI's -22.5%
EXPI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.57, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth 4.5%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.3%
- 6.9% 10Y total return vs HOUS's -35.0%
- Beta 1.57, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.53x
DOUG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.82, Low D/E 56.2%, current ratio 1.63x
- Better valuation composite
- 1.5% margin vs FTHM's -4.7%
- 3.2% ROA vs FTHM's -24.8%, ROIC -26.1% vs -28.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.5% FFO/revenue growth vs FTHM's -2.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.5% margin vs FTHM's -4.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.57 vs FTHM's 2.42 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, vs HOUS's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +375.5% vs EXPI's -22.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs FTHM's -24.8%, ROIC -26.1% vs -28.9% |
FTHM vs HOUS vs EXPI vs DOUG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FTHM vs HOUS vs EXPI vs DOUG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOUG leads in 1 of 6 categories
HOUS leads 1 • EXPI leads 1 • FTHM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HOUS and DOUG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOUS is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 13.9x FTHM's $422M. DOUG is the more profitable business, keeping 1.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FTHM's -4.7%. On growth, FTHM holds the edge at +37.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $422M | $5.9B | $4.8B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | $1.4B | -$12M | -$52M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | -$128M | -$23M | $15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$41M | $108M | -$17M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +47.3% | +7.0% | +16.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | +20.3% | -0.4% | -5.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | -2.2% | -0.5% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | -0.7% | +2.3% | -1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.7% | +5.9% | +8.5% | +0.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.5% | -2.9% | -24.4% | +10.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FTHM and EXPI each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27M | $2.0B | $1.1B | $188M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39M | $4.9B | $926M | $171M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.79x | -15.34x | -46.57x | 12.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 93.14x | 21.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.77x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.35x | 0.22x | 0.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.38x | 1.25x | 4.28x | 1.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 76.08x | 9.63x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOUG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DOUG delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-46 for FTHM. FTHM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.42x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOUS's 1.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTHM scores 4/9 vs HOUS's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -46.1% | -8.4% | -9.4% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.8% | -2.2% | -5.1% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -28.9% | +1.0% | -15.3% | -26.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -39.5% | +1.4% | -9.6% | -16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 1.95x | — | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $2.9B | -$124M | -$17M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $118M | $124M | $120M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $3.1B | $0 | $103M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -43.69x | 0.42x | — | 4.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HOUS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOUS five years ago would be worth $9,871 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $263 for FTHM. Over the past 12 months, HOUS leads with a +375.5% total return vs EXPI's -22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HOUS at 48.6% vs FTHM's -44.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.9% | +26.4% | -27.8% | -6.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.7% | +375.5% | -22.5% | +17.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.8% | +227.9% | -45.7% | -21.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | -1.3% | -73.7% | -79.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.6% | -35.0% | +688.3% | -79.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -44.4% | +48.6% | -18.4% | -7.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOUS and EXPI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXPI is the less volatile stock with a 1.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTHM's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOUS currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs FTHM's 24.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.42x | 1.86x | 1.57x | 1.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.37 | $18.03 | $12.23 | $3.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $3.10 | $5.66 | $1.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.9% | +97.8% | +53.3% | +66.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 77.6 | 48.0 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 138K | 11.5M | 1.0M | 746K |
Analyst Outlook
EXPI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HOUS as "Hold", EXPI as "Buy", DOUG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 68.7% upside for EXPI (target: $11) vs 7.7% for HOUS (target: $19). For income investors, EXPI offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs HOUS's 0.15%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $19.00 | $11.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | +3.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.03 | $0.19 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +5.4% | 0.0% |
DOUG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). HOUS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
FTHM vs HOUS vs EXPI vs DOUG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTHM or HOUS or EXPI or DOUG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, eXp World Holdings, Inc.
(EXPI) is the stronger pick with 4. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (21. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate eXp World Holdings, Inc. (EXPI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTHM or HOUS or EXPI or DOUG?
On forward P/E, Douglas Elliman Inc.
is actually cheaper at 21. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTHM or HOUS or EXPI or DOUG?
Over the past 5 years, Anywhere Real Estate Inc.
(HOUS) delivered a total return of -1. 3%, compared to -97. 4% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXPI returned +688. 3% versus FTHM's -91. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTHM or HOUS or EXPI or DOUG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), eXp World Holdings, Inc.
(EXPI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 57β versus Fathom Holdings Inc. 's 2. 42β — meaning FTHM is approximately 54% more volatile than EXPI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 195% for Anywhere Real Estate Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FTHM or HOUS or EXPI or DOUG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), eXp World Holdings, Inc.
(EXPI) is pulling ahead at 4. 5% versus -2. 9% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Douglas Elliman Inc. grew EPS 118. 7% year-over-year, compared to -30. 7% for Anywhere Real Estate Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXPI leads at 1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTHM or HOUS or EXPI or DOUG?
Douglas Elliman Inc.
(DOUG) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 5% net margin versus -6. 4% for Fathom Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOUS leads at 1. 1% versus -7. 0% for FTHM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOUS leads at 34. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTHM or HOUS or EXPI or DOUG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Douglas Elliman Inc.
(DOUG) trades at 21. 3x forward P/E versus 93. 1x for eXp World Holdings, Inc. — 71. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXPI: 68. 7% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTHM or HOUS or EXPI or DOUG?
In this comparison, EXPI (3.
0% yield), HOUS (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. FTHM, DOUG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FTHM or HOUS or EXPI or DOUG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eXp World Holdings, Inc.
(EXPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3. 0% yield, +688. 3% 10Y return). Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPI: +688. 3%, FTHM: -91. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTHM and HOUS and EXPI and DOUG?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FTHM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EXPI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DOUG is a small-cap deep-value stock. EXPI pays a dividend while FTHM, HOUS, DOUG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.