Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
LZ vs UPWK vs RELY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Software - Infrastructure
LZ vs UPWK vs RELY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $1.05B | $1.38B | $4.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $780M | $595M | $1.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $109M | $106M |
| Gross Margin | 65.9% | 103.0% | 43.6% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 20.7% | 6.9% |
| Forward P/E | 8.4x | 6.1x | 39.7x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $381M | $220M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $203M | $298M | $542M |
LZ vs UPWK vs RELY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) | 100 | 23.2 | -76.8% |
| Upwork Inc. (UPWK) | 100 | 19.6 | -80.4% |
| Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) | 100 | 65.5 | -34.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LZ vs UPWK vs RELY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LZ plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
UPWK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.16
- -49.9% 10Y total return vs RELY's -53.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.16, Low D/E 60.4%, current ratio 1.46x
RELY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.4%, EPS growth 263.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.8%
- 29.4% revenue growth vs UPWK's 2.4%
- +8.1% vs UPWK's -34.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.4% revenue growth vs UPWK's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 39.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.3% margin vs LZ's 1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.16 vs LZ's 1.31 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.1% vs UPWK's -34.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs LZ's 2.2% |
LZ vs UPWK vs RELY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LZ vs UPWK vs RELY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RELY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 2.9x UPWK's $595M. UPWK is the more profitable business, keeping 18.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LZ's 1.5%. On growth, RELY holds the edge at +25.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $780M | $595M | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $56M | $150M | $149M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $109M | $106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $148M | $224M | $256M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.9% | +103.0% | +43.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +20.7% | +6.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +18.3% | +6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +37.7% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.9% | -100.0% | +25.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.8% | +29.6% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
UPWK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, UPWK trades at a 83% valuation discount to LZ's 75.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UPWK's 9.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RELY's 42.0x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $1.4B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $871M | $1.5B | $4.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 75.88x | 12.78x | 73.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.35x | 6.12x | 39.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.53x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.10x | 9.66x | 41.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.39x | 1.76x | 2.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.52x | 2.35x | 5.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.10x | 5.71x | 16.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UPWK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UPWK delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $6 for LZ. LZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPWK's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UPWK scores 6/9 vs RELY's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +17.9% | +12.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +8.5% | +8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +14.3% | +14.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +16.2% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.60x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$179M | $83M | -$322M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $203M | $298M | $542M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $381M | $220M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 58.95x | 146.13x | 16.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — UPWK and RELY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RELY five years ago would be worth $4,704 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,604 for LZ. Over the past 12 months, RELY leads with a +8.1% total return vs UPWK's -34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UPWK at 9.7% vs LZ's -8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.7% | -46.5% | +72.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.3% | -34.8% | +8.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.1% | +32.0% | +25.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.0% | -74.8% | -53.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.0% | -49.9% | -53.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.8% | +9.7% | +7.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UPWK and RELY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UPWK is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LZ's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RELY currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs UPWK's 46.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 1.12x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.40 | $22.84 | $24.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.28 | $10.02 | $12.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.0% | +46.5% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 35.0 | 85.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 3.4M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LZ as "Buy", UPWK as "Buy", RELY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.0% upside for UPWK (target: $16) vs 3.1% for RELY (target: $24).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.17 | $16.13 | $23.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 23 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.7% | +9.8% | +1.1% |
UPWK leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
LZ vs UPWK vs RELY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LZ or UPWK or RELY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is the stronger pick with 29. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). Upwork Inc. (UPWK) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LegalZoom. com, Inc. (LZ) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LZ or UPWK or RELY?
On trailing P/E, Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus LegalZoom. com, Inc. at 75. 9x. On forward P/E, Upwork Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LZ or UPWK or RELY?
Over the past 5 years, Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) delivered a total return of -53. 0%, compared to -84. 0% for LegalZoom. com, Inc. (LZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RELY returned -50. 4% versus LZ's -83. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LZ or UPWK or RELY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus LegalZoom. com, Inc. 's 1. 16β — meaning LZ is approximately 3% more volatile than UPWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LegalZoom. com, Inc. (LZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 60% for Upwork Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LZ or UPWK or RELY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is pulling ahead at 29. 4% versus 2. 4% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Remitly Global, Inc. grew EPS 263. 2% year-over-year, compared to -50. 0% for LegalZoom. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RELY leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LZ or UPWK or RELY?
Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 7% net margin versus 2. 0% for LegalZoom. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPWK leads at 16. 4% versus 1. 9% for LZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPWK leads at 77. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LZ or UPWK or RELY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 39. 7x for Remitly Global, Inc. — 33. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPWK: 52. 0% to $16. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — LZ or UPWK or RELY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LZ or UPWK or RELY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UPWK: -58. 4%, LZ: -83. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LZ and UPWK and RELY?
These companies operate in different sectors (LZ (Industrials) and UPWK (Industrials) and RELY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; RELY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.