Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MTEX vs NATR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
MTEX vs NATR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $9M | $430M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $110M | $490M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $20M |
| Gross Margin | 75.1% | 69.9% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 5.7% |
| Forward P/E | 3.5x | 21.9x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $94M |
MTEX vs NATR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mannatech, Incorpor… (MTEX) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
| Nature's Sunshine P… (NATR) | 100 | 253.1 | +153.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MTEX vs NATR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MTEX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.27
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 77.7%, current ratio 1.25x
- Beta 0.27, current ratio 1.25x
NATR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth 165.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
- 180.2% 10Y total return vs MTEX's -35.2%
- 5.7% revenue growth vs MTEX's -10.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.7% revenue growth vs MTEX's -10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.5x vs 21.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.1% margin vs MTEX's -1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs NATR's 0.62 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +85.3% vs MTEX's -53.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs MTEX's -4.9%, ROIC 21.0% vs 17.3% |
MTEX vs NATR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MTEX vs NATR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NATR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NATR is the larger business by revenue, generating $490M annually — 4.4x MTEX's $110M. NATR is the more profitable business, keeping 4.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MTEX's -1.5%. On growth, NATR holds the edge at +8.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $110M | $490M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $38M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $20M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $23M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.1% | +69.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +4.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.1% | +8.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.9% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MTEX leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.5x trailing earnings, MTEX trades at a 85% valuation discount to NATR's 23.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MTEX's 1.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NATR's 9.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $430M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $355M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.54x | 23.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.41x | 9.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 2.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.52x | 14.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NATR leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NATR delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-24 for MTEX. NATR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MTEX's 0.78x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.8% | +12.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.9% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.3% | +21.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | +13.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$75M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $94M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $19M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 1100.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NATR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NATR five years ago would be worth $11,883 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,901 for MTEX. Over the past 12 months, NATR leads with a +85.3% total return vs MTEX's -53.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NATR at 31.8% vs MTEX's -28.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.1% | +17.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.3% | +85.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.8% | +129.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.0% | +18.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.2% | +180.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.8% | +31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MTEX and NATR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTEX is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NATR's 0.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NATR currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs MTEX's 37.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.45 | $28.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.20 | $12.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.5% | +87.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.6 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 103K |
Analyst Outlook
NATR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $19.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.8% |
NATR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MTEX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MTEX vs NATR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MTEX or NATR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.
(NATR) is the stronger pick with 5. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX). Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX) offers the better valuation at 3. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. (NATR) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MTEX or NATR?
On trailing P/E, Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX) is the cheapest at 3.
5x versus Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. at 23. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MTEX or NATR?
Over the past 5 years, Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.
(NATR) delivered a total return of +18. 8%, compared to -61. 0% for Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NATR returned +180. 2% versus MTEX's -35. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MTEX or NATR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. 's 0. 62β — meaning NATR is approximately 132% more volatile than MTEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. (NATR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 78% for Mannatech, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MTEX or NATR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.
(NATR) is pulling ahead at 5. 7% versus -10. 7% for Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mannatech, Incorporated grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 165. 0% for Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NATR leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MTEX or NATR?
Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.
(NATR) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 1% net margin versus 2. 1% for Mannatech, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 4. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NATR leads at 5. 2% versus 1. 2% for MTEX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTEX leads at 77. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — MTEX or NATR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is MTEX or NATR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTEX: -35. 2%, NATR: +180. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MTEX and NATR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MTEX is a small-cap deep-value stock; NATR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.