Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
PNC vs USB vs TFC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PNC vs USB vs TFC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $88.66B | $86.01B | $65.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33.69B | $42.86B | $24.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.53B | $7.58B | $5.23B |
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | 62.8% | 47.0% |
| Operating Margin | 21.5% | 22.2% | -2.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | 10.9x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $61.67B | $77.93B | $62.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $46.25B | $46.89B | $39.77B |
PNC vs USB vs TFC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The PNC Financial S… (PNC) | 100 | 192.3 | +92.3% |
| U.S. Bancorp (USB) | 100 | 155.5 | +55.5% |
| Truist Financial Co… (TFC) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PNC vs USB vs TFC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 2.9%
- Rev growth 5.6%, EPS growth 7.4%
- 215.5% 10Y total return vs TFC's 100.4%
USB is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.27 vs PNC's 3.11
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 11.0x)
- +38.9% vs TFC's +33.9%
TFC is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 2.7% vs USB's 2.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.6% NII/revenue growth vs TFC's -19.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 11.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TFC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.96 vs TFC's 1.07 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs TFC's 4.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.9% vs TFC's +33.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TFC's 0.5% |
PNC vs USB vs TFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PNC vs USB vs TFC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USB is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.9B annually — 1.8x TFC's $24.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.9% (TFC) to 17.5% (PNC).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $33.7B | $42.9B | $24.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.3B | $10.3B | $7.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.5B | $7.6B | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.4B | $5.1B | $3.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.4% | +62.8% | +47.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | +22.2% | -2.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | +17.7% | +19.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | — | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.6% | +24.8% | -9.1% |
Valuation Metrics
USB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, USB trades at a 25% valuation discount to PNC's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), USB offers better value at 1.40x vs PNC's 4.17x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $88.7B | $86.0B | $65.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $104.1B | $117.0B | $88.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.96x | 12.00x | 14.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.87x | 10.87x | 10.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.17x | 1.40x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.88x | 11.37x | 232.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.63x | 2.01x | 2.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.61x | 1.31x | 1.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.25x | — | 30.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PNC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
USB delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $8 for TFC. TFC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.98x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to USB's 1.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNC scores 7/9 vs TFC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +11.5% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.1% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +5.2% | -0.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +2.3% | -0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.13x | 1.19x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15.4B | $31.0B | $22.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $46.3B | $46.9B | $39.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $61.7B | $77.9B | $62.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.72x | 0.66x | 0.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PNC and USB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PNC five years ago would be worth $12,565 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,734 for TFC. Over the past 12 months, USB leads with a +38.9% total return vs TFC's +33.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USB at 27.3% vs TFC's 24.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.3% | +3.5% | +1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.9% | +38.9% | +33.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.0% | +106.1% | +94.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.7% | +5.9% | -2.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +215.5% | +73.3% | +100.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +27.3% | +24.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PNC and USB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TFC's 1.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 1.01x | 1.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $243.94 | $61.19 | $56.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $163.31 | $41.13 | $38.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.9% | +90.4% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 55.2 | 56.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 9.1M | 8.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PNC and USB and TFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PNC as "Hold", USB as "Hold", TFC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.7% upside for TFC (target: $58) vs 15.2% for PNC (target: $253). For income investors, TFC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.18% vs PNC's 2.89%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $252.63 | $63.82 | $57.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 46 | 49 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | — | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 14 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $6.34 | — | $2.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | 0.0% | +2.7% |
USB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PNC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
PNC vs USB vs TFC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PNC or USB or TFC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is the stronger pick with 5. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 0% for Truist Financial Corporation (TFC). U. S. Bancorp (USB) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PNC or USB or TFC?
On trailing P/E, U.
S. Bancorp (USB) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, U. S. Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: U. S. Bancorp wins at 1. 27x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. 's 3. 11x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PNC or USB or TFC?
Over the past 5 years, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) delivered a total return of +25. 7%, compared to -2. 7% for Truist Financial Corporation (TFC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PNC returned +215. 5% versus USB's +73. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PNC or USB or TFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 96β versus Truist Financial Corporation's 1. 07β — meaning TFC is approximately 12% more volatile than PNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 98% versus 119% for U. S. Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PNC or USB or TFC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is pulling ahead at 5. 6% versus -19. 0% for Truist Financial Corporation (TFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Truist Financial Corporation grew EPS 408. 3% year-over-year, compared to 7. 4% for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PNC or USB or TFC?
Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
9% net margin versus 17. 5% for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USB leads at 22. 2% versus -2. 5% for TFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USB leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PNC or USB or TFC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, U. S. Bancorp (USB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 27x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. 's 3. 11x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, U. S. Bancorp (USB) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TFC: 15. 7% to $57. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — PNC or USB or TFC?
In this comparison, TFC (4.
2% yield), PNC (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. USB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PNC or USB or TFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 96), 2. 9% yield, +215. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PNC: +215. 5%, USB: +73. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PNC and USB and TFC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
PNC, TFC pay a dividend while USB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.