Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RENT vs W
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
RENT vs W — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $18M | $8.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $315M | $12.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $-305M |
| Gross Margin | 72.3% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | -20.3% | 1.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.6x |
| Total Debt | $381M | $4.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $77M | $1.48B |
RENT vs W — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rent the Runway, In… (RENT) | 100 | 1.4 | -98.6% |
| Wayfair Inc. (W) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RENT vs W
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RENT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.68
- Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth 44.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.68, current ratio 1.98x
W is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 83.4% 10Y total return vs RENT's -98.8%
- 5.1% revenue growth vs RENT's 2.7%
- +118.9% vs RENT's +23.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% revenue growth vs RENT's 2.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.4% margin vs W's -2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.68 vs W's 2.85 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +118.9% vs RENT's +23.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs W's -9.6% |
RENT vs W — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RENT vs W — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RENT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
W is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.7B annually — 40.2x RENT's $315M. RENT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to W's -2.4%. On growth, RENT holds the edge at +15.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $315M | $12.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $428M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | -$305M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $456M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.3% | +30.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -20.3% | +1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | -2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.6% | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.4% | +7.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | +10.1% |
Valuation Metrics
RENT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RENT's 4.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than W's 35.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $8.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $322M | $11.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.26x | -27.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.31x | 35.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.06x | 0.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RENT and W each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), W scores 7/9 vs RENT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | -9.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -26.3% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -22.5% | +1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $303M | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $77M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $381M | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.69x | -0.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
W leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in W five years ago would be worth $2,307 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $125 for RENT. Over the past 12 months, W leads with a +118.9% total return vs RENT's +23.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors W at 18.2% vs RENT's -53.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.5% | -38.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.0% | +118.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.0% | +65.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -76.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | +83.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -53.6% | +18.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RENT and W each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RENT is the less volatile stock with a 2.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than W's 2.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. W currently trades 55.0% from its 52-week high vs RENT's 47.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.68x | 2.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.13 | $119.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.69 | $29.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.6% | +55.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.3 | 32.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 79K | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RENT as "Hold" and W as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 149.0% upside for RENT (target: $12) vs 51.6% for W (target: $100).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $100.07 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 57 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RENT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). W leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
RENT vs W: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RENT or W a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Wayfair Inc.
(W) is the stronger pick with 5. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for Rent the Runway, Inc. (RENT). Analysts rate Wayfair Inc. (W) a "Buy" — based on 57 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RENT or W?
Over the past 5 years, Wayfair Inc.
(W) delivered a total return of -76. 9%, compared to -98. 8% for Rent the Runway, Inc. (RENT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: W returned +83. 4% versus RENT's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RENT or W?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rent the Runway, Inc.
(RENT) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 68β versus Wayfair Inc. 's 2. 85β — meaning W is approximately 6% more volatile than RENT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — RENT or W?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wayfair Inc.
(W) is pulling ahead at 5. 1% versus 2. 7% for Rent the Runway, Inc. (RENT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rent the Runway, Inc. grew EPS 44. 1% year-over-year, compared to 39. 5% for Wayfair Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RENT leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RENT or W?
Wayfair Inc.
(W) is the more profitable company, earning -2. 5% net margin versus -22. 8% for Rent the Runway, Inc. — meaning it keeps -2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: W leads at 0. 1% versus -15. 5% for RENT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RENT leads at 73. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RENT or W more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RENT: 149.
0% to $12. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — RENT or W?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is RENT or W better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Wayfair Inc.
(W) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Rent the Runway, Inc. (RENT) carries a higher beta of 2. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (W: +83. 4%, RENT: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RENT and W?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.