Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RENT vs W vs REAL vs AMZN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RENT
Rent the Runway, Inc.

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$18M
5Y Perf.-98.6%
W
Wayfair Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.71B
5Y Perf.-73.4%
REAL
The RealReal, Inc.

Luxury Goods

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.59B
5Y Perf.-4.8%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+60.8%

RENT vs W vs REAL vs AMZN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RENT logoRENT
W logoW
REAL logoREAL
AMZN logoAMZN
IndustryApparel - RetailSpecialty RetailLuxury GoodsSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$18M$8.71B$3.59B$2.92T
Revenue (TTM)$315M$12.66B$723M$742.78B
Net Income (TTM)$11M$-305M$-65M$90.80B
Gross Margin72.3%30.1%73.3%50.6%
Operating Margin-20.3%1.1%-1.9%11.5%
Forward P/E23.6x307.7x34.8x
Total Debt$381M$4.07B$463M$152.99B
Cash & Equiv.$77M$1.48B$151M$86.81B

RENT vs W vs REAL vs AMZNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RENT
W
REAL
AMZN
StockOct 21May 26Return
Rent the Runway, In… (RENT)1001.4-98.6%
Wayfair Inc. (W)10026.6-73.4%
The RealReal, Inc. (REAL)10095.2-4.8%
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)100160.8+60.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RENT vs W vs REAL vs AMZN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMZN leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Wayfair Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. REAL also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
RENT
Rent the Runway, Inc.
The Secondary Option

RENT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
W
Wayfair Inc.
The Value Play

W is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (23.6x vs 34.8x)
  • +117.4% vs RENT's +21.5%
Best for: value and momentum
REAL
The RealReal, Inc.
The Growth Play

REAL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.7%
  • 15.4% revenue growth vs RENT's 2.7%
Best for: growth exposure
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Income Pick

AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 1.51
  • 7.0% 10Y total return vs W's 67.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 37.2%, current ratio 1.05x
  • Beta 1.51, current ratio 1.05x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthREAL logoREAL15.4% revenue growth vs RENT's 2.7%
ValueW logoWLower P/E (23.6x vs 34.8x)
Quality / MarginsAMZN logoAMZN12.2% margin vs REAL's -9.0%
Stability / SafetyAMZN logoAMZNBeta 1.51 vs REAL's 2.95
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)W logoW+117.4% vs RENT's +21.5%
Efficiency (ROA)AMZN logoAMZN11.5% ROA vs REAL's -17.3%

RENT vs W vs REAL vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

RENTRent the Runway, Inc.
FY 2014
Tv Essentials
53.5%$55M
Movies Everywhere
28.7%$30M
OnDemand Everywhere
13.9%$14M
Other Services
4.0%$4M
WWayfair Inc.
FY 2025
US Segment
88.1%$11.0B
International Segment
11.9%$1.5B
REALThe RealReal, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
77.3%$536M
Product
13.1%$91M
Shipping and Handling
9.5%$66M
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Stores
37.6%$269.3B
Third-Party Seller Services
24.0%$172.2B
Amazon Web Services
18.0%$128.7B
Advertising Services
9.6%$68.6B
Subscription Services
6.9%$49.6B
Physical Stores
3.1%$22.6B
Other Services
0.8%$5.9B

RENT vs W vs REAL vs AMZN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGREAL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — REAL and AMZN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 2361.8x RENT's $315M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to REAL's -9.0%. On growth, REAL holds the edge at +18.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricRENT logoRENTRent the Runway, …W logoWWayfair Inc.REAL logoREALThe RealReal, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$315M$12.7B$723M$742.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$36M$428M$11M$155.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$11M-$305M-$65M$90.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$14M$456M$13M-$2.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+72.3%+30.1%+73.3%+50.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-20.3%+1.1%-1.9%+11.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.4%-2.4%-9.0%+12.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.6%+3.6%+1.7%-0.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.4%+7.4%+18.5%+16.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.8%+10.1%-150.0%+74.8%
Evenly matched — REAL and AMZN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

W leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, RENT's 4.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REAL's 430.5x.

MetricRENT logoRENTRent the Runway, …W logoWWayfair Inc.REAL logoREALThe RealReal, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$18M$8.7B$3.6B$2.92T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$321M$11.3B$3.9B$2.98T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.26x-27.36x-18.24x37.82x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.63x307.69x34.77x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.35x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.30x35.11x430.51x20.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.06x0.70x5.19x4.07x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.14x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.78x195.62x378.98x
W leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), W scores 7/9 vs REAL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricRENT logoRENTRent the Runway, …W logoWWayfair Inc.REAL logoREALThe RealReal, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+23.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.6%-9.6%-17.3%+11.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-26.3%+14.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-22.5%+1.4%-15.0%+15.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95756
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.37x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$303M$2.6B$312M$66.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$77M$1.5B$151M$86.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$381M$4.1B$463M$153.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.69x-0.63x-5.83x39.96x
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $123 for RENT. Over the past 12 months, W leads with a +117.4% total return vs RENT's +21.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REAL at 108.4% vs RENT's -53.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRENT logoRENTRent the Runway, …W logoWWayfair Inc.REAL logoREALThe RealReal, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-41.5%-37.9%-21.5%+19.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+21.5%+117.4%+75.9%+43.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.2%+65.6%+805.1%+156.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.8%-78.3%-45.6%+64.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.8%+67.0%-57.1%+697.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-53.9%+18.3%+108.4%+36.8%
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

AMZN is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REAL's 2.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs RENT's 46.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRENT logoRENTRent the Runway, …W logoWWayfair Inc.REAL logoREALThe RealReal, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.68x2.85x2.95x1.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.13$119.98$17.39$278.56
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.69$29.75$4.70$185.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+46.8%+55.2%+71.3%+97.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.738.666.381.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded80K3.6M3.3M45.5M
AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: RENT as "Hold", W as "Buy", REAL as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 153.2% upside for RENT (target: $12) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307).

MetricRENT logoRENTRent the Runway, …W logoWWayfair Inc.REAL logoREALThe RealReal, Inc.AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.00$100.07$18.17$306.77
# AnalystsCovering analysts19572594
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). W leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RENT vs W vs REAL vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RENT or W or REAL or AMZN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The RealReal, Inc.

(REAL) is the stronger pick with 15. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for Rent the Runway, Inc. (RENT). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wayfair Inc. (W) a "Buy" — based on 57 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RENT or W or REAL or AMZN?

On forward P/E, Wayfair Inc.

is actually cheaper at 23. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RENT or W or REAL or AMZN?

Over the past 5 years, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -98. 8% for Rent the Runway, Inc. (RENT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus RENT's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RENT or W or REAL or AMZN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus The RealReal, Inc. 's 2. 95β — meaning REAL is approximately 96% more volatile than AMZN relative to the S&P 500.

05

Which is growing faster — RENT or W or REAL or AMZN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The RealReal, Inc.

(REAL) is pulling ahead at 15. 4% versus 2. 7% for Rent the Runway, Inc. (RENT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The RealReal, Inc. grew EPS 45. 2% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RENT leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RENT or W or REAL or AMZN?

Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -22. 8% for Rent the Runway, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -15. 5% for RENT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RENT leads at 73. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RENT or W or REAL or AMZN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Wayfair Inc.

(W) trades at 23. 6x forward P/E versus 307. 7x for The RealReal, Inc. — 284. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RENT: 153. 2% to $12. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RENT or W or REAL or AMZN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is RENT or W or REAL or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+697. 8% 10Y return). Rent the Runway, Inc. (RENT) carries a higher beta of 2. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +697. 8%, RENT: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RENT and W and REAL and AMZN?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: RENT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; W is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

RENT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 43%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

W

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

REAL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMZN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform RENT and W and REAL and AMZN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(RENT: 15.4% · W: 7.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.